A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Glide computer in certified glider



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old May 21st 18, 05:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Paul Agnew
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 306
Default Glide computer in certified glider

It's a suckers bet. I have no doubt that you can find someone at a FSDO that will agree with you. I also have no doubt that Darryl can find many more FAA Inspectors that will agree with him.

As a side job to my airline position, I work closely with the FAA on Master Minimum Equipment List policy and the default answer to any question the FAA is unprepared to answer is always skewed to more paperwork and regulation. In essence, it's easier to say, "no" than to do the research and say, "yes". I can recount many instances where the FAA stance was negative until the regulations, advisory circulars, institutional preactices, and legal interpretations were presented. Still, we still run into POIs and PMIs that are stubborn about their pet opinions and will not accept anything that is outside of their comfort zone without a mandate from above. The same holds for IAs/AIs who have chosen to interpret the guidance to suit their opinions. I've heard some really creative, but solid logic on repairs and rebuilding from IAs around the hangar over the years.

I have a lot of respect for the experts at the FAA, but they cannot know everything and will often default to "you can't do that" when pressed for an opinion without time to research the issue. Darryl has clearly presented a strong case that would hold up to FAA scrutiny.

The continued bickering is juvenile and embarrassing.

Enough talking...Let's Fly!

Paul A.
Jupiter, FL

  #52  
Old May 21st 18, 05:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Paul Agnew
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 306
Default Glide computer in certified glider

Fuel for the fire. I found this letter from the FAA Milwaukee FSDO in response to an inordinate number of Form 337s being filed for radio installations. It may be old, but I don't know of any change in policy since the date of the letter regarding 337s.

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...lt/qodHhczVS1Y



U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration
Flight Standards District Office
4915 South Howell Avenue
Milwaukee, WI 53207

DATE: June 5, 1995

SUBJECT: Major Alterations

TO: Certified Repair Stations and Inspection
Authorization (IA's)

This office is frequently confronted with questions regarding
what constitutes a major alteration, especially when
installation or removal of avionics and other similar
equipment is involved. The following information is provided
to help mechanics and repair stations understand this
sometimes complicated matter. The regulatory definitions of
major alterations are found in Federal Aviation Regulations
(FAR) 1 and 43, Appendix A (a). These regulations are often
interpreted too conservatively resulting in minor alterations
being treated as major alterations.

Simple alterations that do not affect the structural
integrity of the aircraft, alterations that are made by the
same method as the aircraft manufacturer has used or
installation of equipment listed by the aircraft manufacturer
as "Optional Equipment" may be considered minor alterations.
A simple equipment installation that is made in an aircraft
with units mounted on factory provided racks may be
considered as minor alterations. The certificated person
installing the equipment is responsible to use the
information provided by the equipment manufacturer, and that
information in Advisory Circular (AC) 43.13-1 and 43.13-2
regarding wire size, circuit protection, wire support,
antenna installation, etc. They are also responsible to
record the alteration in the aircraft records in accordance
with FAR 43.9 (logbook entry) and update the weight and
balance and equipment list.

We do not wish to imply that field approvals of equipment
installation is never required. Examples of installations
that would require field approval a

* Alterations that involve the construction of a radio rack
or shelf.

* An installation made in an instrument panel that is a
structural part of the aircraft and requiring an opening
to be cut in areas other than that specified by the
aircraft manufacturer.

* Special FAA policy sometimes requires field approval on
installation of new types of equipment such as the current
requirement for GPS.

If you have any questions regarding this memo, or are in
doubt as to whether a 337 is required, please do no
hesitate to contact this office.


Sincerely,

Thomas L. Lind
Supervisor, Airworthiness
Certificate Management Unit
  #53  
Old May 21st 18, 06:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Craig Funston[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 129
Default Glide computer in certified glider

On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 9:50:09 AM UTC-7, Paul Agnew wrote:
Fuel for the fire. I found this letter from the FAA Milwaukee FSDO in response to an inordinate number of Form 337s being filed for radio installations. It may be old, but I don't know of any change in policy since the date of the letter regarding 337s.

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...lt/qodHhczVS1Y



U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration
Flight Standards District Office
4915 South Howell Avenue
Milwaukee, WI 53207

DATE: June 5, 1995

SUBJECT: Major Alterations

TO: Certified Repair Stations and Inspection
Authorization (IA's)

This office is frequently confronted with questions regarding
what constitutes a major alteration, especially when
installation or removal of avionics and other similar
equipment is involved. The following information is provided
to help mechanics and repair stations understand this
sometimes complicated matter. The regulatory definitions of
major alterations are found in Federal Aviation Regulations
(FAR) 1 and 43, Appendix A (a). These regulations are often
interpreted too conservatively resulting in minor alterations
being treated as major alterations.

Simple alterations that do not affect the structural
integrity of the aircraft, alterations that are made by the
same method as the aircraft manufacturer has used or
installation of equipment listed by the aircraft manufacturer
as "Optional Equipment" may be considered minor alterations.
A simple equipment installation that is made in an aircraft
with units mounted on factory provided racks may be
considered as minor alterations. The certificated person
installing the equipment is responsible to use the
information provided by the equipment manufacturer, and that
information in Advisory Circular (AC) 43.13-1 and 43.13-2
regarding wire size, circuit protection, wire support,
antenna installation, etc. They are also responsible to
record the alteration in the aircraft records in accordance
with FAR 43.9 (logbook entry) and update the weight and
balance and equipment list.

We do not wish to imply that field approvals of equipment
installation is never required. Examples of installations
that would require field approval a

* Alterations that involve the construction of a radio rack
or shelf.

* An installation made in an instrument panel that is a
structural part of the aircraft and requiring an opening
to be cut in areas other than that specified by the
aircraft manufacturer.

* Special FAA policy sometimes requires field approval on
installation of new types of equipment such as the current
requirement for GPS.

If you have any questions regarding this memo, or are in
doubt as to whether a 337 is required, please do no
hesitate to contact this office.


Sincerely,

Thomas L. Lind
Supervisor, Airworthiness
Certificate Management Unit


The FAA has done a reasonably good job of outlining what's required, but they have thrown in a few head scratchers.

It's referenced in their 2016 Memorandum regarding Installation Approval for ADS-B Out Systems. The memo's available from this FAA webpage https://www..faa.gov/nextgen/equipadsb/installation/ Click on the link to AFS-360_2016-03-02.pdf

Reader's digest version:

- Pairings of transmitters / GPS source must be approved. Pairings are not specific to any particular aircraft. "Once the performance of the initial pairing has been established, the FAA considers follow-on installations of the same pairing to be approved". This means in any aircraft. Gliders are aircraft and nothing glider specific is required or desired.

- This is a minor alteration unless installation of antennas penetrating pressure vessels is required, etc. There's a good flow-chart outlining this on the last page of the PDF.

The FAA asks that ADS-B Out installations on CERTIFIED aircraft be documented with an advisory 337 submitted directly to OK City (NOT the local FSDO). This confuses folks since the 337 title says "Major Repair and Alteration", but we're not doing a major alteration. Cognitive dissonance anyone.. Anyways, just go with it. The FAA had to figure out a way to track who's installing ADS-B and that's what they chose. It's NOT a major alteration for any glider that I can think of. The feds even give you the specific language to enter on the 337. Again, just go with it.

Let's stay with the specific guidance the FAA has provided regarding ADS-B Out installations and not get wrapped around the axle of what we believe are conflicting regs. As with any bureaucracy there will be lack of clarity at times and cases where regs conflict. Let's not make it worse by running it through the RAS mill.

Cheers,
Craig
  #54  
Old May 21st 18, 07:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 774
Default Glide computer in certified glider

"I have no doubt that you can find someone at a FSDO that will agree with you. I also have no doubt that Darryl can find many more FAA Inspectors that will agree with him."

Airshow pilots, who deal with different FSDOs every weekend during the airshow season are fond of saying, "The FAA has about 90 FSDOs. Each independently owned and operated."

Some FSDO inspectors are great and know their stuff. Some are not so great and make stuff up all the time. Gotta watch out for that, as the tendency in the bureaucracy is to circle the wagons and back up erroneous directives and advice to avoid having to admit to a mistake.

  #55  
Old May 21st 18, 10:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
2G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,439
Default Glide computer in certified glider

On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 11:40:20 AM UTC-7, wrote:
"I have no doubt that you can find someone at a FSDO that will agree with you. I also have no doubt that Darryl can find many more FAA Inspectors that will agree with him."

Airshow pilots, who deal with different FSDOs every weekend during the airshow season are fond of saying, "The FAA has about 90 FSDOs. Each independently owned and operated."

Some FSDO inspectors are great and know their stuff. Some are not so great and make stuff up all the time. Gotta watch out for that, as the tendency in the bureaucracy is to circle the wagons and back up erroneous directives and advice to avoid having to admit to a mistake.


I spoke with Dave Hartson at the Spokane FSDO (509-532-2360) and, when asked if an ADS-B Out install in a standard category aircraft was a minor or major alteration, his reply was "It depends." What it depends upon is the complexity of the installation. If it can be accomplished with simple hand tools, it was probably minor. But if it involved "drilling holes and using pop rivets" it was probably a major. They are very willing to give guidance on this issue if drawings, photos, sketches, etc. of the proposed install is sent to them. He also said that experimental aircraft only require a logbook entry signed off by an A&P.

Tom
  #56  
Old May 22nd 18, 12:15 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Craig Funston[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 129
Default Glide computer in certified glider

On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 2:57:36 PM UTC-7, 2G wrote:
On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 11:40:20 AM UTC-7, wrote:
"I have no doubt that you can find someone at a FSDO that will agree with you. I also have no doubt that Darryl can find many more FAA Inspectors that will agree with him."

Airshow pilots, who deal with different FSDOs every weekend during the airshow season are fond of saying, "The FAA has about 90 FSDOs. Each independently owned and operated."

Some FSDO inspectors are great and know their stuff. Some are not so great and make stuff up all the time. Gotta watch out for that, as the tendency in the bureaucracy is to circle the wagons and back up erroneous directives and advice to avoid having to admit to a mistake.


I spoke with Dave Hartson at the Spokane FSDO (509-532-2360) and, when asked if an ADS-B Out install in a standard category aircraft was a minor or major alteration, his reply was "It depends." What it depends upon is the complexity of the installation. If it can be accomplished with simple hand tools, it was probably minor. But if it involved "drilling holes and using pop rivets" it was probably a major. They are very willing to give guidance on this issue if drawings, photos, sketches, etc. of the proposed install is sent to them. He also said that experimental aircraft only require a logbook entry signed off by an A&P.

Tom


Thanks for checking Tom.

Oklahoma City has already provided guidance in this memo (link below) that very clearly says what is and isn't major.

http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgPolicy.nsf/0/1fdea629cd029a7c86257f7900601653/$FILE/AFS-360_2016-03-02.pdf

The guidance document is in agreement with your FSDO that experimental aircraft only need a logbook entry and do not require reporting.

Install reporting for certificated aircraft with approved pairings is direct to Oklahoma City and is not supposed to go through any of the FSDOs.

It's nice that Spokane FSDO has an opinion and is willing to help, but guidance from OK City supersedes any of the FSDOs & we want to avoid getting a large diversity of opinions from different regions. I'm sure that's why the Feds published an overarching guidance document.

Spend some time going over the document. The process is surprisingly straightforward.

Thanks again,
Craig

  #57  
Old May 22nd 18, 02:05 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 42
Default Glide computer in certified glider

SO you CAPITALISE and shout when you lose eh?
What a dip**** you are 2G.
  #58  
Old May 22nd 18, 02:55 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
jfitch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,134
Default Glide computer in certified glider

On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 2:57:36 PM UTC-7, 2G wrote:
On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 11:40:20 AM UTC-7, wrote:
"I have no doubt that you can find someone at a FSDO that will agree with you. I also have no doubt that Darryl can find many more FAA Inspectors that will agree with him."

Airshow pilots, who deal with different FSDOs every weekend during the airshow season are fond of saying, "The FAA has about 90 FSDOs. Each independently owned and operated."

Some FSDO inspectors are great and know their stuff. Some are not so great and make stuff up all the time. Gotta watch out for that, as the tendency in the bureaucracy is to circle the wagons and back up erroneous directives and advice to avoid having to admit to a mistake.


I spoke with Dave Hartson at the Spokane FSDO (509-532-2360) and, when asked if an ADS-B Out install in a standard category aircraft was a minor or major alteration, his reply was "It depends." What it depends upon is the complexity of the installation. If it can be accomplished with simple hand tools, it was probably minor. But if it involved "drilling holes and using pop rivets" it was probably a major. They are very willing to give guidance on this issue if drawings, photos, sketches, etc. of the proposed install is sent to them. He also said that experimental aircraft only require a logbook entry signed off by an A&P.

Tom


A drill and pop rivet puller are simple hand tools. Not sure what is simpler - maybe a hammer. I'd go by the official FAA document, which someone put some thought into.
  #59  
Old May 22nd 18, 06:07 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
2G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,439
Default Glide computer in certified glider

On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 6:55:09 PM UTC-7, jfitch wrote:
On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 2:57:36 PM UTC-7, 2G wrote:
On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 11:40:20 AM UTC-7, wrote:
"I have no doubt that you can find someone at a FSDO that will agree with you. I also have no doubt that Darryl can find many more FAA Inspectors that will agree with him."

Airshow pilots, who deal with different FSDOs every weekend during the airshow season are fond of saying, "The FAA has about 90 FSDOs. Each independently owned and operated."

Some FSDO inspectors are great and know their stuff. Some are not so great and make stuff up all the time. Gotta watch out for that, as the tendency in the bureaucracy is to circle the wagons and back up erroneous directives and advice to avoid having to admit to a mistake.


I spoke with Dave Hartson at the Spokane FSDO (509-532-2360) and, when asked if an ADS-B Out install in a standard category aircraft was a minor or major alteration, his reply was "It depends." What it depends upon is the complexity of the installation. If it can be accomplished with simple hand tools, it was probably minor. But if it involved "drilling holes and using pop rivets" it was probably a major. They are very willing to give guidance on this issue if drawings, photos, sketches, etc. of the proposed install is sent to them. He also said that experimental aircraft only require a logbook entry signed off by an A&P.

Tom


A drill and pop rivet puller are simple hand tools. Not sure what is simpler - maybe a hammer. I'd go by the official FAA document, which someone put some thought into.


You are welcome to take a jackhammer to your glider for all I care.

Tom
  #60  
Old May 22nd 18, 06:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
2G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,439
Default Glide computer in certified glider

On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 6:05:23 PM UTC-7, wrote:
SO you CAPITALISE and shout when you lose eh?
What a dip**** you are 2G.


Maybe, just maybe, someday you will make an intelligent post, but I seriously doubt it.

Tom
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Glide computer review Itsaplane[_2_] Soaring 24 December 11th 09 06:43 PM
Cheap Glide Computer Uncle Fuzzy Soaring 18 November 9th 09 10:24 PM
iPhone Glide Computer Kloudy via AviationKB.com Soaring 13 September 13th 07 03:41 AM
Glide computer Mark Siegelberg Soaring 1 January 13th 07 02:08 PM
Best Glide computer and why Roger Soaring 10 October 24th 06 08:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.