If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
wings came off
.....and none of it may bear any resemblance to the current accident.
The design of an ultralight foot-launched sailplane obviously introduces more compromises than conventional designs. Looking at the manufacturer's website videos shows that the rigging of the wings seems very different from modern sailplanes, which typically use overlapping spars. What would worry me, though, is that after one wing separated, the second wing and tailplane rapidly followed, then the tail boom. The glider basically disintegrated. Mike |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
wings came off
Don Johnstone wrote:
I think we are getting a little away from the point. The original proposition that pulling G in any glider would result in failure. I suggested that catostropic failure would not necessarily occur in many gliders. It all depends on how many Gs you pull. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
wings came off
Mike the Strike wrote:
What would worry me, though, is that after one wing separated, the second wing and tailplane rapidly followed, thenthe tail boom. I would assume that after one wing has separated, it couldn't matter less whether the seond wing follows or not. According to Rupport Composite, the Archaeopteryx is designed for a maximum maneuver load of 4 g at 85 km/h. The pilot himself confirmed that he had exceeded the allowed load by flying too fast and pulling too hard. Source: http://www.ruppert-composite.ch/5312...fb06c0c01.html (German only). |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
wings came off
On 9/22/2010 6:13 PM, Bob Kuykendall wrote:
On Sep 22, 4:06 pm, Don wrote: ...The RAF bought 100 Grob Acros, 99 went into service and 1 went to Slingsby for testing on a rig... We should be cautious about confusing anecdote with data. The testing of one relatively conservatively-designed trainer doesn't tell us much about the strength of the average sport or racing sailplane. Kinda-sorta related, I'll bet big bux sailplane designers (and maybe even the JAR/FAA design criteria folks) carefully tweak their design limits to whatever materials they're using for primary structure, too. The 1.5 ultimate/limit load factor ratio has historical roots in the metal world. Early glass-glider designers quickly realized the relative floppiness of 'pure fiberglass structures' meant stiffness needed to be explicitly addressed when it came to wing structure, hence - in spar breakage terms - 'glass gliders' tend to be 'overstrength' simply because it's necessary in order to obtain a useably high Vne while avoiding flutter. (How well your metal pushrods will work/stand-up at max-load-deflections is of course a tale in itself. Joe Test Pilot, anyone?) Carbon fiber primary wing structure meant designers could back away from 'stiffness-influenced overstrength structures' since carbon fiber structures (pound for pound) are so much stiffer than their fiberglass equivalents. Is any of this relevant to the real world of Joe Pilot? Is the Pope Catholic? Regards, Bob W. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
wings came off
(How well your metal pushrods will
work/stand-up at max-load-deflections is of course a tale in itself. Joe Test Pilot, anyone?) Which reminds me that I've wondered WHY they're still using metal pushrods in carbon wings, instead of pultruded carbon tubing pushrods. Perhaps because we still don't trust the bond between a carbon tube and the metal fitting? |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
wings came off
On Sep 23, 5:56*pm, Grider Pirate wrote:
(How well your metal pushrods will work/stand-up at max-load-deflections is of course a tale in itself. Joe Test Pilot, anyone?) Which reminds me that I've wondered WHY they're still using metal pushrods in carbon wings, instead of pultruded carbon tubing pushrods. Perhaps because we still don't trust the bond between a carbon tube and the metal fitting? Cost. Open class gliders are often out of rig ;-) Dick Butler has used carbon tubes in Concordia. Best Regards, Dave |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
wings came off
On Sep 23, 2:56*pm, Grider Pirate wrote:
Which reminds me that I've wondered WHY they're still using metal pushrods in carbon wings, instead of pultruded carbon tubing pushrods. Perhaps because we still don't trust the bond between a carbon tube and the metal fitting? Dave nailed it: cost, as in cost per unit stiffness. Carbon might be stiffer per unit mass and per unit volume, but is painful in terms of stiffness per unit paycheck. Stan Hall wrote a great article on this that describes how Euler's law of column buckling shows that strength cancels out of the equation; it is dominated by the stiffness. So once you decide to use aluminum, it pretty much doesn't matter what aluminum you use. No need for 7075-T6 or even 2024-T3, good old 6061-T6 will do just fine so that's what I (and most European makers) use. The article is in the highly- recommended _Collected Works of Stan Hall, Vol 1_. Your other point is quite valid as well. Establishing a reliable high- strength bond between a carbon fiber tube and its end features is still a bit exotic. I've seen it done, but it's just not something I want to do and trust my life to. Thanks, Bob K. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
wings came off
Dave Nadler wrote:
Which reminds me that I've wondered WHY they're still using metal pushrods in carbon wings, instead of pultruded carbon tubing pushrods. Cost. I would rather say: high cost vs. zero benefit. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
wings came off
On Sep 23, 3:45*pm, John Smith wrote:
Dave Nadleur wrote: Which reminds me that I've wondered WHY they're still using metal pushrods in carbon wings, instead of pultruded carbon tubing pushrods. Cost. I would rather say: high cost vs. zero benefit. There are exceptions. Early Stemme S10-VT's used aluminum push rods for the spoilers, which had the over center for locking the spoilers closed in the spoiler box. Problems occurred with the differential thermal expansion between the aluminum rods and CF wings. In cold temperatures the spoilers could unlock without pilot input. Changing the push rods to carbon fiber solved the problem and CF rods are used for spoilers on Stemmes now. bumper MKIV and QV Minden |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
hey Bob, don't look. There are no wings :-) | Glenn[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 2 | May 19th 08 04:43 PM |
PC-9 with all the wings :-) | Glenn[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 1 | August 19th 07 01:52 AM |
X-Wings and Canard Rotor Wings. | Charles Gray | Rotorcraft | 1 | March 22nd 05 12:26 AM |
wings | mark | Owning | 18 | February 7th 04 10:07 AM |
What it took to get wings in WW II. | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 29 | July 16th 03 07:42 AM |