If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Blade type VHF antenna?
Can anyone tell me if there are any significant electronic performance
differences in those "shorter blade type" (just over a foot) VHF com antennas from the standard length stainless whip? Jim |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
It depends ENTIRELY on how they are foreshortening the antenna. If they are
using super-wide conductors (the entire width of the blade) to get the foreshortening, then it is a very efficient antenna. If they are using loading coils inside with a relatively narrow antenna diameter, it is a very inefficient antenna. The only way to know for sure is to ask the manufacturer for a data/spec sheet or cut the antenna open. Jim (JFLEISC) shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: -Can anyone tell me if there are any significant electronic performance -differences in those "shorter blade type" (just over a foot) VHF com antennas -from the standard length stainless whip? - -Jim Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
It depends ENTIRELY on how they are foreshortening the antenna. If they are
using super-wide conductors (the entire width of the blade) to get the foreshortening, then it is a very efficient antenna. If they are using loading coils inside with a relatively narrow antenna diameter, it is a very inefficient antenna. The only way to know for sure is to ask the manufacturer for a data/spec sheet or cut the antenna open. Jim Will one of those SWR meters tell you anything? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
No, it just tells you how good the impedance match is. A good match
is a necessary, but not sufficient condition, to a high efficiency antenna installation. However, a power meter in the far field will tell you how good your antenna is and give you a relative indication of how adjustments are effecting your ability to reach out and touch someone. (JFLEISC) wrote in message Will one of those SWR meters tell you anything? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Jay wrote:
No, it just tells you how good the impedance match is. A good match is a necessary, but not sufficient condition, to a high efficiency antenna installation. However, a power meter in the far field will tell you how good your antenna is and give you a relative indication of how adjustments are effecting your ability to reach out and touch someone. (JFLEISC) wrote in message Will one of those SWR meters tell you anything? Very true, and the efficiency may depend on the surface used as a ground plane as much as anything else. Peter P.S.: It is also usefull to check more than one frequency! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 07 Dec 2003 11:01:29 -0800, Jim Weir wrote:
It depends ENTIRELY on how they are foreshortening the antenna. If they are using super-wide conductors (the entire width of the blade) to get the foreshortening, then it is a very efficient antenna. If they are using loading coils inside with a relatively narrow antenna diameter, it is a very inefficient antenna. The only way to know for sure is to ask the manufacturer for a data/spec sheet or cut the antenna open. I tried that stunt back in the early 80's out of interest. The couple of manufacturers that I asked were very coy about parting with detailed information about what was inside their antennas. It was very generic stuff like..."a printed circuit etched radiator with double sided etched capacitors and inductors appropriately tapped to the radiator to achieve optimum matching" !!! I once managed to get access to an industrial X-ray machine and got a picture of the innards of a Collins military VHF-UHF blade antenna. Eye opening stuff, indeed...but trying to reproduce it? It would hardly be worth the manhour effort compared with knocking up a 26" piece of 1/8" brazing rod into a 1/4 wave radiator. Jim Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 10:58:17 +1100, smithxpj
wrote: On Sun, 07 Dec 2003 11:01:29 -0800, Jim Weir wrote: It depends ENTIRELY on how they are foreshortening the antenna. If they are using super-wide conductors (the entire width of the blade) to get the foreshortening, then it is a very efficient antenna. If they are using loading coils inside with a relatively narrow antenna diameter, it is a very inefficient antenna. The only way to know for sure is to ask the manufacturer for a data/spec sheet or cut the antenna open. I tried that stunt back in the early 80's out of interest. The couple of manufacturers that I asked were very coy about parting with detailed information about what was inside their antennas. It was very generic stuff like..."a printed circuit etched radiator with double sided etched capacitors and inductors appropriately tapped to the radiator to achieve optimum matching" !!! I once managed to get access to an industrial X-ray machine and got a picture of the innards of a Collins military VHF-UHF blade antenna. Eye opening stuff, indeed...but trying to reproduce it? It would hardly be worth the manhour effort compared with knocking up a 26" piece of 1/8" brazing rod into a 1/4 wave radiator. If it's a blade type, why not put in a flat piece of brass or copper stock and trim for resonance, or use a matching network? I'd think something that large (length to width) wouldn't take much loading. OTOH I guess linear loading could be used. Double sided circuit board with the back a thin ground....maybe widening out to provide more capacitance near the end... It'd take some experimenting, but I'd think it'd work. I know...Lots of weasel words, but I haven't actually tried it so it's more thinking out loud. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair?) www.rogerhalstead.com Return address modified due to dumb virus checkers Jim Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RF interference issue again (esp. for E Drucker and Jim Weir and other RF wizards) | Snowbird | Home Built | 78 | December 3rd 03 09:10 PM |
Marker Beacon Antenna - Paging Jim Weir. | Bart D. Hull | Home Built | 1 | November 27th 03 10:31 PM |
Type of wing carrythrough? | Toks Desalu | Home Built | 0 | October 30th 03 08:35 PM |
Foil antenna and carbon fiber | BD5ER | Home Built | 11 | August 6th 03 04:44 AM |
Antenna Ground Plane Grounding | Fastglasair | Home Built | 1 | July 8th 03 05:21 PM |