zzzzzzzzzzzzzz and Adam aircraft

Whats with mooz and Adam aircraft? Didn't last year he have some sort
of gripe with them for taking their new jet to a fly-in? In todays blog
he came down on them for doing what alot of others have done. He is
barking about the Certification claims of Adam. They claim that they
are FAA certificated. He doesn't like the fact that they don't spell
out restrictions they have in their Type Certificate data sheet.Nearly
every Certificated item has restrictions on it. All homebuilts are
certificated and they have restrictions as to where they can fly,no
passengers ect for the first few hours. Same for 135 or 121 operators
they have op specs that restrict them and they don't publish them and
they are still Certificated. I guess that will teach them not to
advertise on the awful news nutwork.

Frank M.Hitlaw
Jakarta,Indonesia

I'm surprised that you're surprised.

By definition, all those "zzz's" in the subject line indicate a tale
of illogic and often of malice is to follow.

Mike


On 6 Jun 2005 16:03:12 -0700, wrote:



Whats with mooz and Adam aircraft? Didn't last year he have some sort
of gripe with them for taking their new jet to a fly-in? In todays blog
he came down on them for doing what alot of others have done. He is
barking about the Certification claims of Adam. They claim that they
are FAA certificated. He doesn't like the fact that they don't spell
out restrictions they have in their Type Certificate data sheet.Nearly
every Certificated item has restrictions on it. All homebuilts are
certificated and they have restrictions as to where they can fly,no
passengers ect for the first few hours. Same for 135 or 121 operators
they have op specs that restrict them and they don't publish them and
they are still Certificated. I guess that will teach them not to
advertise on the awful news nutwork.

Frank M.Hitlaw
Jakarta,Indonesia

Mike Patterson
Please remove the spamtrap to email me.
"I always wanted to be somebody...I should have been more specific..." - Lily Tomlin

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

In article .com,
says...

Whats with mooz and Adam aircraft? Didn't last year he have some sort
of gripe with them for taking their new jet to a fly-in?
In todays blog
he came down on them for doing what alot of others have done. He is
barking about the Certification claims of Adam. They claim that they
are FAA certificated. He doesn't like the fact that they don't spell
out restrictions they have in their Type Certificate data sheet.Nearly
every Certificated item has restrictions on it. All homebuilts are
certificated and they have restrictions as to where they can fly,no
passengers ect for the first few hours. Same for 135 or 121 operators
they have op specs that restrict them and they don't publish them and
they are still Certificated. I guess that will teach them not to
advertise on the awful news nutwork.

Or worse yet, stop advertizing on awful news net(ANN). Just ask the companies
that got served papers at SnF what happens when you stop your ads you didn't
want.

See ya

Chuck S

wrote:

Whats with mooz and Adam aircraft? Didn't last year he have some sort
of gripe with them for taking their new jet to a fly-in? In todays blog
he came down on them for doing what alot of others have done. He is
barking about the Certification claims of Adam. They claim that they
are FAA certificated. He doesn't like the fact that they don't spell
out restrictions they have in their Type Certificate data sheet.Nearly
every Certificated item has restrictions on it. All homebuilts are
certificated and they have restrictions as to where they can fly,no
passengers ect for the first few hours. Same for 135 or 121 operators
they have op specs that restrict them and they don't publish them and
they are still Certificated. I guess that will teach them not to
advertise on the awful news nutwork.

He's just peeved because they aren't giving him the credit he's due.
After all the free design work he did for them, they're still pretending
it's *their* design.


ry
--

Robert Yoder wrote:
wrote:

Whats with mooz and Adam aircraft? Didn't last year he have some sort
of gripe with them for taking their new jet to a fly-in? In todays blog
he came down on them for doing what alot of others have done. He is
barking about the Certification claims of Adam. They claim that they
are FAA certificated. He doesn't like the fact that they don't spell
out restrictions they have in their Type Certificate data sheet.Nearly
every Certificated item has restrictions on it. All homebuilts are
certificated and they have restrictions as to where they can fly,no
passengers ect for the first few hours. Same for 135 or 121 operators
they have op specs that restrict them and they don't publish them and
they are still Certificated. I guess that will teach them not to
advertise on the awful news nutwork.

He's just peeved because they aren't giving him the credit he's due.
After all the free design work he did for them, they're still pretending
it's *their* design.


ry
--

How long before the revelation that he test flew it at mach 3 in an
outside loop??

Harry K

Robert Yoder wrote:
wrote:

Whats with mooz and Adam aircraft? Didn't last year he have some sort
of gripe with them for taking their new jet to a fly-in?

That wasn't Jim, that was me, and I still think it was a dumb publicity
stunt.

Juan Jimenez wrote:
Robert Yoder wrote:
wrote:

Whats with mooz and Adam aircraft? Didn't last year he have some sort
of gripe with them for taking their new jet to a fly-in?

That wasn't Jim, that was me, and I still think it was a dumb publicity
stunt.

Hmmmmmmm, a publicity stunt,sorta like jim going to Sun-N-Fun after
he was permanently banned.I can see how you are an expert on that
subject.

Frank M Hitlaw
Jakarta,Indonesia

Juan Jimenez wrote:
Robert Yoder wrote:
wrote:

Whats with mooz and Adam aircraft? Didn't last year he have some sort
of gripe with them for taking their new jet to a fly-in?

That wasn't Jim, that was me, and I still think it was a dumb publicity
stunt.

Hmmmmmmm, a publicity stunt,sorta like jim going to Sun-N-Fun after
he was permanently banned.I can see how you are an expert on that
subject.

Frank M Hitlaw
Jakarta,Indonesia

Juan Jimenez wrote:
Robert Yoder wrote:
wrote:

Whats with mooz and Adam aircraft? Didn't last year he have some sort
of gripe with them for taking their new jet to a fly-in?

That wasn't Jim, that was me, and I still think it was a dumb publicity
stunt.

Hmmmmmmm, a publicity stunt,sorta like jim going to Sun-N-Fun after
he was permanently banned.I can see how you are an expert on that
subject.

Frank M Hitlaw
Jakarta,Indonesia

In article .com,
says...
Whats with mooz and Adam aircraft? Didn't last year he have some sort
of gripe with them for taking their new jet to a fly-in?

That wasn't Jim, that was me, and I still think it was a dumb publicity
stunt.

Hmmmmmmm, a publicity stunt,sorta like jim going to Sun-N-Fun after
he was permanently banned.I can see how you are an expert on that
subject.

Hey Frank, it depends who's publicity stunt is being gored!! LOL!! I wonder if
Adams was an advertizer that quit or someone who didn't want to advertize
?Either way that's usually the reason companies get "special" treatment from
zoomie. In my own humble opinion of course :-)

Chuck(zoomed and survived) S RAH-14/1 ret

"credibility it was always about credibility" chuck s