A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Metallic paint and composite antenna signal strength



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old June 28th 05, 12:38 AM
RST Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Absolutely NOT. That is the LAST place you want a ferrite-foil dipole. You
want a "stock" "B-B on a BNC" with a pie plate ground plane. Dipoles waste
half your expensive transmitter power warming up the ionosphere.

Jim



"Joe Camp" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 07:41:15 -0700, "RST Engineering"
wrote:



sounds like a good place to use Wier's foil antenna setup :-)



  #22  
Old July 3rd 05, 05:28 AM
firstflight
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sorry for the delay in my response. I was dragged away on vacation.

The antenna is designed to be "GLUED" in place. See the info at:
http://www.advancedaircraft.com/index.htm

The paint in question is made by Dupont and has actual medium and small
Aluminum flakes in it.

I am going without the metallic paint just to be sure, but glad I was able
to get some thoughts on the topic.

Thanks all.



"Rich S." wrote in message
...
"RST Engineering" wrote in message
...
No, that wasn't the point. You CAN'T bond (as in glued to) a ground
plane type of transponder antenna to the plastic fuselage. If you were
so ... ummm ... thoughtless as to try and bond a dipole type antenna for
transponder use half your transponder power gets radiated into outer
space. Where, as I understand it, no ATC facilities yet exist.


Actually, ATC probably does have facilities somewhere in "outer" space.
Local space has yet to comply with the EPA regs.

Rich "How far out is outer??" S



  #23  
Old July 3rd 05, 04:17 PM
RST Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sorry, if I had known you were spending hundreds of dollars of your money on
fives and tens of dollars worth of antennas I'd have told you to go to the
manufacturer who is taking your money and ask the question. After all, you
should be getting SOMETHING for your money.

I will stand by my assertion that if you do not use a ground plane for your
transponder antenna you will be wasting half of your transponder power.

Jim



"firstflight" wrote in message
...
Sorry for the delay in my response. I was dragged away on vacation.

The antenna is designed to be "GLUED" in place. See the info at:
http://www.advancedaircraft.com/index.htm



  #24  
Old July 26th 05, 09:10 PM
Rich S.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"RST Engineering" wrote in message
...
No, that wasn't the point. You CAN'T bond (as in glued to) a ground plane
type of transponder antenna to the plastic fuselage. If you were so ...
ummm ... thoughtless as to try and bond a dipole type antenna for
transponder use half your transponder power gets radiated into outer
space. Where, as I understand it, no ATC facilities yet exist.


Actually, ATC probably does have facilities somewhere in "outer" space.
Local space has yet to comply with the EPA regs.

Rich "How far out is outer??" S


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.