If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
GA Callsigns
Jay Maynard wrote in
: On 2008-03-15, Jay Honeck wrote: I used to fly a Cessna Cutlass. When I checked in using that type, controllers often came back with "November xxxxx" because they seldom heard that type, I suppose...or they said "Douglas xxxxx" or "Cardinal xxxxx" or some such. We long ago gave up saying "Pathfinder November five six niner nine tree" -- all you get is a lot of "What's that?" from controllers. We just say "Dakota five six niner niner tree" now, and they all get it. I'm curious to see what the reactions to "Zodiac five five zulu charlie" will be. There's not much I can replace it with. What do I tell ATC when they ask what that is? (Aside from "my airplane", of course.) Normally it's "experimental" for a homebuilt. Bertie |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
GA Callsigns
B A R R Y wrote in
: On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:17:29 GMT, "Jay Honeck" wrote: We long ago gave up saying "Pathfinder November five six niner nine tree" -- all you get is a lot of "What's that?" from controllers. We just say "Dakota five six niner niner tree" now, and they all get it. Try "Sundowner"... Then, you give them Bravo-Echo-2-3 as a type, and get "Why is your Bonanza going so slow?" several times, as BE33 was typed in to the ATC system. G Or you could say musketeer. They want to have a rough idea of the shape of your airplane and it's performance. That's why they ask. They aren't interested in your HP how many goo gaas the airplane has or the color of the upholstery. Bertie |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
GA Callsigns
"Marco Leon" wrote in message ... We were always taught to refer to ourselves on the radio with our full callsigns until ATC refers to us with a shortened callsign (i.e. the last three characters). However, I've noticed that the majority of the approach controllers refer to most of the GA aircraft as "November" followed by their numbers/letters. My question (to controllers in particular) is, do they prefer us to refer to ourselves thereafter as "November xxxxxx" as well or do they prefer us to keep with the "Cherokee/Cessna/Mooney..." moniker? I prefer that pilots refer to themselves by aircraft name and full registration less "November"; "Skylark niner eight zero one victor", "Colt one fower fife tree alpha", "Navion six seven two two bravo", "Seabee two tree eight sierra charlie", etc. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
GA Callsigns
"Jay Maynard" wrote in message ... I'm curious to see what the reactions to "Zodiac five five zulu charlie" will be. There's not much I can replace it with. What do I tell ATC when they ask what that is? (Aside from "my airplane", of course.) Try CH60. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
GA Callsigns
On 2008-03-15, Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Jay Maynard" wrote in message ... I'm curious to see what the reactions to "Zodiac five five zulu charlie" will be. There's not much I can replace it with. What do I tell ATC when they ask what that is? (Aside from "my airplane", of course.) Try CH60. Will they be able to answer their questions by asking their computer what a CH60 is? What is it they need to know about an aircraft that knowing the model tells them, anyway? -- Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net http://www.hercules-390.org (Yes, that's me!) Buy Hercules stuff at http://www.cafepress.com/hercules-390 |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
GA Callsigns
"Jay Maynard" wrote in message ... Will they be able to answer their questions by asking their computer what a CH60 is? What is it they need to know about an aircraft that knowing the model tells them, anyway? CH60 tells them what to enter as the aircraft type if they do intend to enter it into the flight data computer. That's probably all they're looking for. You've told them you're a Zodiac so they already know what to call you. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
GA Callsigns
On 2008-03-15, Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
CH60 tells them what to enter as the aircraft type if they do intend to enter it into the flight data computer. That's probably all they're looking for. You've told them you're a Zodiac so they already know what to call you. Okkay, thanks. Don't want to give them a long soliloquy if they're just interested in one bit of info. -- Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!) AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (getting ready to order) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
GA Callsigns
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:58:31 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote: Or you could say musketeer. I could. But I don't want to! G It all usually boils down to "Beech 5-8... |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
GA Callsigns
B A R R Y wrote in
: On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:58:31 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Or you could say musketeer. I could. But I don't want to! G It all usually boils down to "Beech 5-8... ONce they know what you are... Bertie |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
GA Callsigns
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:J%PCj.23717$TT4.11472@attbi_s22... We long ago gave up saying "Pathfinder November five six niner nine tree" -- all you get is a lot of "What's that?" from controllers. We just say "Dakota five six niner niner tree" now, and they all get it. According to the FAA registration database N56993 is assigned to a PA-28-235 manufactured in 1973. That would make it a Cherokee Charger, the PA-28-235 would be renamed Cherokee Pathfinder in 1974. The Dakota came along in 1979 as the PA-28-236 with the tapered wing. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fessing up time on callsigns | José Herculano | Naval Aviation | 26 | February 5th 05 08:31 AM |
On the subject of callsigns - what was the most preposterous you have seen? | Giz | Naval Aviation | 27 | September 10th 03 04:58 AM |
On the subject of callsigns - what was the most preposterous | Pechs1 | Naval Aviation | 6 | August 31st 03 02:51 PM |
Callsigns from hell... | José Herculano | Naval Aviation | 27 | August 30th 03 04:44 PM |
On the subject of callsigns - what was the most preposterousyou have seen? | Doug \Woody\ and Erin Beal | Naval Aviation | 1 | August 26th 03 03:45 AM |