If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
"darwin smith" wrote in message link.net... You've just gone a long way toward's blowing whatever credibility you might have with this statement. It wasn't a statement, it was a question, and one that apparently stumped you. Actually, there are several methods available that already are acting to prevent abortions, with Planned Parenthood being one of their leading proponents. The fall under the general category of "birth control procedures", and people generally learn about them through something called "sex education". Those are not abortion procedures. While I am firmly pro-choice, You are firmly pro-murder, for that is what abortion is at present. I am willing to admit that the anti-abortion side (which is not necessarily pro-life, so I won't call it such) does have a point. Anti-abortion IS pro-life. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
in article . net, Steven P.
McNicoll at wrote on 4/17/04 1:10 PM: "Philip Sondericker" wrote in message ... Errr, then explain again how we're financing the current war? Do you think redistributing other peoples assets is financing the war? No, I think that redistributing my assets is financing the war. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
"Philip Sondericker" wrote in message ... No, I think that redistributing my assets is financing the war. What caused you to think that? |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
|
#76
|
|||
|
|||
"Philip Sondericker" wrote in message ... Whose money are we using--the Belgian's? Did you not understand the question? |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
"Ray Andraka" wrote in message ... I get better gas mileage in my '65 Cherokee Six than a Hummer gets on the highway, 153 MPH at 14 GPH = 10.9 miles per gallon (statute miles). Gee, that's something to boast about, a vehicle that gets better gas mileage than a Hummer. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"darwin smith" wrote in message hlink.net... You've just gone a long way toward's blowing whatever credibility you might have with this statement. It wasn't a statement, it was a question, and one that apparently stumped you. It was a question asked in such a way as to imply that the "answer" was completely obvious - there is no fight against gay marraige. I therefore treated the comment as a statement being expressed in the form of a rhetorical question. Now, I would guess that to you the answer to your "question" is perfectly obvious - there is no fight against gay marriage. If this is so, then could you please explain to me why the Republican efforts in Massachussetts to ban same-sex unions, and "Bush the Lesser's" proposed constitutional amendment are not "fights against gay marriage"/ Actually, there are several methods available that already are acting to prevent abortions, with Planned Parenthood being one of their leading proponents. The fall under the general category of "birth control procedures", and people generally learn about them through something called "sex education". Those are not abortion procedures. While I am firmly pro-choice, You are firmly pro-murder, for that is what abortion is at present. I disagree, obviously, but as I say below I can understand your view. I am willing to admit that the anti-abortion side (which is not necessarily pro-life, so I won't call it such) does have a point. Anti-abortion IS pro-life. Even when there is no exception to save the life of the mother? By the way, I see that you didn't bother to address my comments about birth control, sex education, and generally being around when Suzy really needs the help. Let me know when you're ready and willing to discuss the _complete_ topic of abortion, and have moved beyond just casting judgement on those who happen to disagree with you. Rich Lemert |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
"darwin smith" wrote in message hlink.net... It was a question asked in such a way as to imply that the "answer" was completely obvious - there is no fight against gay marraige. There isn't. Gays marry regularly and have done so for quite some time. I therefore treated the comment as a statement being expressed in the form of a rhetorical question. Now, I would guess that to you the answer to your "question" is perfectly obvious - there is no fight against gay marriage. If this is so, then could you please explain to me why the Republican efforts in Massachussetts to ban same-sex unions, and "Bush the Lesser's" proposed constitutional amendment are not "fights against gay marriage"/ Gay marriage is not the same as same-sex marriage. I disagree, obviously, but as I say below I can understand your view. All abortion procedures performed today cause the deliberate death of the child. That is murder by any reasonable definition. Even when there is no exception to save the life of the mother? By the way, I see that you didn't bother to address my comments about birth control, sex education, and generally being around when Suzy really needs the help. Let me know when you're ready and willing to discuss the _complete_ topic of abortion, and have moved beyond just casting judgement on those who happen to disagree with you. Those things are not abortion procedures. We were discussing abortion procedures. |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 12:47 AM |
Pilot's Political Orientation | Chicken Bone | Instrument Flight Rules | 317 | June 21st 04 06:10 PM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | Military Aviation | 120 | January 27th 04 10:19 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |