A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Stupid transponder question, or, stumped by the wife



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 14th 05, 05:15 PM
John Kirksey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stupid transponder question, or, stumped by the wife

So we were watching "Seconds From Disaster" on NGC last night, which
happened to be on AA 77. When they mentioned that seconds after gaining
control of the aircraft the hijackers turned off the transponder (along with
a brief explanation of what the transponder does), my wife simply says:

"That's stupid, why does something like that even have an on/off switch?"

I honestly never thought about it and couldn't answer her question. Does
anyone know?

Regards,

John K.



  #2  
Old September 14th 05, 05:44 PM
Steve Foley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Can you picture the radar screen in Boston/New York/Chicago/LAX when all the
planes on the ground are showing up? The radar sweeps by and shows 23 planes
lines up for the departure runway, superimposed on whoever is flying
overhead.



"John Kirksey" wrote in message
news:_0YVe.24770$8h6.7135@trnddc09...
So we were watching "Seconds From Disaster" on NGC last night, which
happened to be on AA 77. When they mentioned that seconds after gaining
control of the aircraft the hijackers turned off the transponder (along

with
a brief explanation of what the transponder does), my wife simply says:

"That's stupid, why does something like that even have an on/off switch?"

I honestly never thought about it and couldn't answer her question. Does
anyone know?

Regards,

John K.





  #3  
Old September 14th 05, 05:47 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Or what Chicago center sees in east central Wisconsin the last week of
July, first week of August.....

Only 10.5 months until the next bash!

  #4  
Old September 14th 05, 09:31 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Steve Foley wrote:
Can you picture the radar screen in Boston/New York/Chicago/LAX when all the
planes on the ground are showing up? The radar sweeps by and shows 23 planes
lines up for the departure runway, superimposed on whoever is flying
overhead.


Irrelavant. The radar computer has software that will not show any
target within the user specified distance from the radar antenna. We
set ours to 1 mile. There are also altitude filters that can be set.
There is no good reason to ever turn your transponder off or to STBY
unless ATC asks you to or you somehow know it's not working properly.
  #5  
Old September 14th 05, 09:39 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Newps" wrote in message
...

Irrelavant. The radar computer has software that will not show any target
within the user specified distance from the radar antenna. We set ours to
1 mile. There are also altitude filters that can be set.


Facilities that do radar approaches don't tend to filter out these targets.



There is no good reason to ever turn your transponder off or to STBY
unless ATC asks you to or you somehow know it's not working properly.


ASR on the field is good reason to turn your transponder off or to STBY
without ATC request.


  #6  
Old September 14th 05, 10:03 PM
Frank Ch. Eigler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Newps writes:

Can you picture the radar screen in Boston/New York/Chicago/LAX
when all the planes on the ground are showing up? The radar sweeps
by and shows 23 planes lines up for the departure runway,
superimposed on whoever is flying overhead.


Irrelavant. The radar computer has software that will not show any
target within the user specified distance from the radar antenna.
[...]


Maybe, but it is still a problem for aircraft with TCAS, who
receive false alarms due to the ground traffic.

- FChE
  #8  
Old September 14th 05, 11:36 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:

Newps writes:


Can you picture the radar screen in Boston/New York/Chicago/LAX
when all the planes on the ground are showing up? The radar sweeps
by and shows 23 planes lines up for the departure runway,
superimposed on whoever is flying overhead.



Irrelavant. The radar computer has software that will not show any
target within the user specified distance from the radar antenna.
[...]



Maybe, but it is still a problem for aircraft with TCAS, who
receive false alarms due to the ground traffic.


Then their TCAS has problems. Properly operating TCAS knows the
aircraft is stationary plus below a certain altitude it is advisory in
nature. If this were a problem I would hear about it from aircraft with
TCAS. Not once in the last 17 years has an aircraft with TCAS so much
as mentioned they were receiving an alert from an aircraft holding short
of the runway.
  #9  
Old September 15th 05, 10:42 AM
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Newps wrote:

Irrelavant. The radar computer has software that will not show any
target within the user specified distance from the radar antenna. We
set ours to 1 mile. There are also altitude filters that can be set.
There is no good reason to ever turn your transponder off or to STBY
unless ATC asks you to or you somehow know it's not working properly.


There's still another problem called FRUIT (False Replies Unsynchronised
in Time). The radar bean has a width of about 3 degrees. All the
transponders in this small area respond with their code as soon as the
radar beam hits them. A major installation can handle up to ten codes
simultaneously. But if on a nice Sunday several hundred VFR air planes
are about the situation has arisen where the targets could no longer be
properly separated, with the result that the important echoes of
commercial traffic disappeared in the maze.

The controller can erase the VFR echoes, but when the radar con not read
them anymore the legibility of the remaining echoes is not improved.
Actually, this is one of the reasons why mode S is introduced.

Stefan
  #10  
Old September 14th 05, 06:11 PM
Paul kgyy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

When diagnosing electrical problems, it's helpful to be able to
selectively turn things off.

When I'm downloading data from my EDM, I turn all the radio gear off to
avoid unnecessary battery drain.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________---_ unakm Karl Treier Aviation Marketplace 3 December 17th 04 11:37 PM
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________ efamf Keith Willshaw Naval Aviation 4 November 11th 04 01:51 AM
Stupid hp to thrust question Mark Home Built 52 December 9th 03 01:41 PM
Transponder Question log Home Built 2 December 2nd 03 06:08 PM
Stupid super cub question Robert Loer Home Built 9 November 22nd 03 05:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.