A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

metric system newsgroup call for votes #1



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 16th 03, 06:59 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Pat Norton" wrote in message
...
Gene Nygaard wrote
The problem is comparing two imperial to


1853 m might actually be nearer to the true value than 1853.172 m
5. Given that the true value at any point varies by tens of metres,
they may have rejected the idea of maintaining mm precision. The
question then becomes why did they abandon the precise relationship
with the knot.


Of course, only an technocrat would want to make mm measurements over a
minute of arc. It is as though Gene's mother is also his aunt.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Edwards air show B-1 speed record attempt Paul Hirose Military Aviation 146 November 3rd 03 05:18 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.