If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ...
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ink.net... "Michael Petukhov" wrote in message om... Hm.. China, India and Russia are all planing to fly manned mission to moon in the near future. US certainly hopes to be in time inorder to eliminate as many of material evidences of its faked "moon landings" as possible. An expected move though. So it seems we are gonna to see new moon racing. this time criminals vs. policemen. Ironic indeed. How could there be any evidence of a faked moon landing on the moon? Proof that they were faked would be an absence of evidence at the landing sites. Anyway Michael has insisted that moon flights are impossible It is plain lie Keith. Michael so the Chinese Indians and Russians must be really setting up a new special effects unit in Bollywood. Keith |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
"Gunnar" wrote in message ... "RobbelothE" skrev i melding ... If the USA is so bad and so screwed up and so anti-human rights, perhaps some of the enlightened readership might explain why so many people are trying to get into the USA (legally and otherwise). Now that is damn easy to answer. Just because some 3'rd world country is a bad (worse) place to live, does not make the US a shining example by default. Actually, it does make it a shining example, by default. At least in comparison to all of those nations that those folks are trying to leave behind--and FYI, a lot of them come from other "first world" nations. Brooks Ed |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
"Michael Petukhov" wrote in message om... "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... Anyway Michael has insisted that moon flights are impossible It is plain lie Keith. Michael you DID say that, I cannot judge if you were lying however Specifically on 19 April last year when Dennis Jensen asked when you weigh up whether it is more plausible that man went to the moon, or whether this massive hoax was perpetrated, the hoax looks very weak. What part of the technology for a moon landing do you think was impossible, given the technology of the day. You replied Well. That's interesting question. I think there are a few key things which were impossible at that time and from impossible to very difficult now. 1) Protection against radiation in the space ship. I know there are some ideas how to do that but still none of human space ships was ever build with protection against radiation. 2) landing procedure suitable for humans aboard on the planets without atmosphere is still untested. 3) space suits equipped with protection against radiation for moon walk is still a problem as far as I know. 4) Docking in space was not solve at that time. Russians did it first but in low earth orbit and the procedure was very unreliable. By the way huge Saturn V was build only to ovoid docking in space. Otherwise they would easily intergrate a ship of enough weight for the moon flight without this huge booster. So you clearly DID say that there were certain things which made it impossible now ans others which made it very hard. Keith |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Keith Willshaw wrote:
Michael you DID say that, I cannot judge if you were lying however *LOL* [Quotes snipped ... what would we do without Google's archive? :-) ] So you clearly DID say that there were certain things which made it impossible now ans others which made it very hard. C'mon, Keith - would you use rational argumentation when trying to convince a brick wall? So why are you trying it with Michael? SCNR Andreas |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
"Andreas Parsch" wrote in message ... Keith Willshaw wrote: Michael you DID say that, I cannot judge if you were lying however *LOL* [Quotes snipped ... what would we do without Google's archive? :-) ] So you clearly DID say that there were certain things which made it impossible now ans others which made it very hard. C'mon, Keith - would you use rational argumentation when trying to convince a brick wall? So why are you trying it with Michael? Because its fun Keith |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Name a better example.
Jarg "Gunnar" wrote in message ... "RobbelothE" skrev i melding ... If the USA is so bad and so screwed up and so anti-human rights, perhaps some of the enlightened readership might explain why so many people are trying to get into the USA (legally and otherwise). Now that is damn easy to answer. Just because some 3'rd world country is a bad (worse) place to live, does not make the US a shining example by default. Ed "An appeaser is someone who feeds the crocodile hoping it will eat him last." Winston Churchill |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ...
"Andreas Parsch" wrote in message ... Keith Willshaw wrote: Michael you DID say that, I cannot judge if you were lying however *LOL* [Quotes snipped ... what would we do without Google's archive? :-) ] So you clearly DID say that there were certain things which made it impossible now ans others which made it very hard. C'mon, Keith - would you use rational argumentation when trying to convince a brick wall? So why are you trying it with Michael? Because its fun Anyway Michael has insisted that moon flights are impossible It is plain lie Keith. Michael you DID say that, I cannot judge if you were lying however I agree it is fun. But it would be even funnier if you stop distorting the true. I said "..think there are a few key things which were impossible at that time and from impossible to very difficult now..." which is quite opposite to as you say "that moon flights are impossible". Michael Keith |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
That's not the way I read it. If you said that a few key things necessary
for moon flight were impossible then you are saying moon flights were impossible. Jarg "Michael Petukhov" wrote in message om... "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "Andreas Parsch" wrote in message ... Keith Willshaw wrote: Michael you DID say that, I cannot judge if you were lying however *LOL* [Quotes snipped ... what would we do without Google's archive? :-) ] So you clearly DID say that there were certain things which made it impossible now ans others which made it very hard. C'mon, Keith - would you use rational argumentation when trying to convince a brick wall? So why are you trying it with Michael? Because its fun Anyway Michael has insisted that moon flights are impossible It is plain lie Keith. Michael you DID say that, I cannot judge if you were lying however I agree it is fun. But it would be even funnier if you stop distorting the true. I said "..think there are a few key things which were impossible at that time and from impossible to very difficult now..." which is quite opposite to as you say "that moon flights are impossible". Michael Keith |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
"Michael Petukhov" wrote in message om... Michael you DID say that, I cannot judge if you were lying however I agree it is fun. But it would be even funnier if you stop distorting the true. I said "..think there are a few key things which were impossible at that time and from impossible to very difficult now..." which is quite opposite to as you say "that moon flights are impossible". Michael If you say 'a few keys thing that vary from impossible to difficult' you clearly mean SOME of them are impossible ergo you are propounding the belief that moon flights are impossible. I realise that this puts you in a difficult position when your own country suggests otherwise bit that's your problem old boy. Keith |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ...
"Michael Petukhov" wrote in message om... Michael you DID say that, I cannot judge if you were lying however I agree it is fun. But it would be even funnier if you stop distorting the true. I said "..think there are a few key things which were impossible at that time and from impossible to very difficult now..." which is quite opposite to as you say "that moon flights are impossible". Michael If you say 'a few keys thing that vary from impossible to difficult' you clearly mean SOME of them are impossible ergo you are propounding the belief that moon flights are impossible. I realise that this puts you in a difficult position when your own country suggests otherwise bit that's your problem old boy. Absolutely not. The key word here is NOW. So even those key things thich are impossible now will be possible tomorrow. So it is you who tried to distort my words and was cought red-handed. Sorry you totally lost that battle, Keith. Michael So yuo lost that battle Keith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
Bush's guard record | JDKAHN | Home Built | 13 | October 3rd 04 09:38 PM |
"W" is JFK's son and Bush revenge killed Kennedy in 1963 | Ross C. Bubba Nicholson | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | August 28th 04 10:36 PM |
for mr. pethukov ( Bush May Announce Return To Moon At Kitty Hawk) | captain! | Military Aviation | 6 | October 30th 03 05:11 PM |