If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Cambridge 302 Question
I've have a Cambridge 302 in my glider. I have the setting at 0%
since I have the total energy probe fed into it, along with the pitot tube and static port. The te tube is split just behind the cockpit as recommended. The static and pitot are split or "t'd" behind the instrument panel. When I push hard forward to increase airspeed.....the cambridge VSI goes up to 10knots positive. Then when I pull back to bleed off airspeed.....the VSI goes down to 10 knots negative. The manual says to increase the % , but doesn't say how much. Another option is to not use the te tube and put it at 100%. The te probe in my glider is located about 6 feet behind the wing spar on the top of the fuselage. It's not the conventional spot on the rudder. Any thoughts? Recommendations? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Cambridge 302 Question
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Cambridge 302 Question
On Apr 19, 1:51*pm, wrote:
I've have a Cambridge 302 in my glider. *I have the setting at 0% since I have the total energy probe fed into it, along with the pitot tube and static port. *The te tube is split just behind the cockpit as recommended. *The static and pitot are split or "t'd" behind the instrument panel. When I push hard forward to increase airspeed.....the cambridge VSI goes up to 10knots positive. Then when I pull back to bleed off airspeed.....the VSI goes down to 10 knots negative. The manual says to increase the % , but doesn't say how much. Another option is to not use the te tube and put it at 100%. The te probe in my glider is located about 6 feet behind the wing spar on the top of the fuselage. *It's not the conventional spot on the rudder. Any thoughts? *Recommendations? Yep, pretty easy. Normally you would just change the % compensation until it behaves as you want. But then normally you would need little if any electronic compensation. You say it's a fuselage mounted probe, there is nothing wrong per se with fuselage mounted TE probes, Dick Johnson spent time trying to point that out. Presumably you have a mechanical vario and capacity flask on the other side of the split TE line. Does that mechanical vario seem to behave correctly? If so the problem is at the Cambridge 302, and that 302 should not need huge compensation adjustments (normally none). Check the plumbing carefully, it might be as simple as you actually have the static and TE lines crossed at the Cambridge (that would be the first thing to check - don't rely on the color or the tubing etc. (it might be spliced wrong you cant' see) really check there is a air pressure connection by blowing gently onto (not into!) the TE probe). Also simplify the problem. Block off any ports you really don't need. Check all connections carefully, etc. Block the other side of the TE line where it splits. Double check that the IAS and pressure altitude on Cambridge all look OK (long shot but it may show up a problems). If you start to suspect the Cambridge, try just sticking it on the static line with 100% compensation and see what it does. But this really should not be needed. Darryl |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Cambridge 302 Question
On Apr 19, 4:27*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Apr 19, 1:51*pm, wrote: I've have a Cambridge 302 in my glider. *I have the setting at 0% since I have the total energy probe fed into it, along with the pitot tube and static port. *The te tube is split just behind the cockpit as recommended. *The static and pitot are split or "t'd" behind the instrument panel. When I push hard forward to increase airspeed.....the cambridge VSI goes up to 10knots positive. Then when I pull back to bleed off airspeed.....the VSI goes down to 10 knots negative. The manual says to increase the % , but doesn't say how much. Another option is to not use the te tube and put it at 100%. The te probe in my glider is located about 6 feet behind the wing spar on the top of the fuselage. *It's not the conventional spot on the rudder. Any thoughts? *Recommendations? Yep, pretty easy. Normally you would just change the % compensation until it behaves as you want. But then normally you would need little if any electronic compensation. You say it's a fuselage mounted probe, there is nothing wrong per se with fuselage mounted TE probes, Dick Johnson spent time trying to point that out. Presumably you have a mechanical vario and capacity flask on the other side of the split TE line. Does that mechanical vario seem to behave correctly? If so the problem is at the Cambridge 302, and that 302 should not need huge compensation adjustments (normally none). Check the plumbing carefully, it might be as simple as you actually have the static and TE lines crossed at the Cambridge (that would be the first thing to check - don't rely on the color or the tubing etc. (it might be spliced wrong you cant' see) really check there is a air pressure connection by blowing gently onto (not into!) the TE probe). Also simplify the problem. Block off any ports you really don't need. Check all connections carefully, etc. Block the other side of the *TE line where it splits. Double check that the IAS and pressure altitude on Cambridge all look OK (long shot but it may show up a problems). If you start to suspect the Cambridge, try just sticking it on the static line with 100% compensation and see what it does. But this really should not be needed. Darryl- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I have all new tubing and new capacity flasks. The other two mechanical VSI seem to work well. The cambridge works well too....unless I push forward to speed up or pull back fast to slow down. Does the 100% compensation and the two static line system work ok? SA |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Cambridge 302 Question
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Cambridge 302 Question
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Cambridge 302 Question
On Apr 19, 1:51*pm, wrote:
I've have a Cambridge 302 in my glider. *I have the setting at 0% since I have the total energy probe fed into it, along with the pitot tube and static port. *The te tube is split just behind the cockpit as recommended. *The static and pitot are split or "t'd" behind the instrument panel. When I push hard forward to increase airspeed.....the cambridge VSI goes up to 10knots positive. Then when I pull back to bleed off airspeed.....the VSI goes down to 10 knots negative. The manual says to increase the % , but doesn't say how much. Another option is to not use the te tube and put it at 100%. The te probe in my glider is located about 6 feet behind the wing spar on the top of the fuselage. *It's not the conventional spot on the rudder. Any thoughts? *Recommendations? Scott, Go to screen 10 on the CAI 302 and note the indicated airspeed. You may have the Pitot & static switched. Which mode are you in when this happens climb or Cruise? At TE probe requires that the Compensation be set at 0%. The Probe supplies the Compensation. Richard www.craggyaero.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Cambridge 302 Question
On Apr 19, 2:34*pm, wrote:
On Apr 19, 4:27*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Apr 19, 1:51*pm, wrote: I've have a Cambridge 302 in my glider. *I have the setting at 0% since I have the total energy probe fed into it, along with the pitot tube and static port. *The te tube is split just behind the cockpit as recommended. *The static and pitot are split or "t'd" behind the instrument panel. When I push hard forward to increase airspeed.....the cambridge VSI goes up to 10knots positive. Then when I pull back to bleed off airspeed.....the VSI goes down to 10 knots negative. The manual says to increase the % , but doesn't say how much. Another option is to not use the te tube and put it at 100%. The te probe in my glider is located about 6 feet behind the wing spar on the top of the fuselage. *It's not the conventional spot on the rudder. Any thoughts? *Recommendations? Yep, pretty easy. Normally you would just change the % compensation until it behaves as you want. But then normally you would need little if any electronic compensation. You say it's a fuselage mounted probe, there is nothing wrong per se with fuselage mounted TE probes, Dick Johnson spent time trying to point that out. Presumably you have a mechanical vario and capacity flask on the other side of the split TE line. Does that mechanical vario seem to behave correctly? If so the problem is at the Cambridge 302, and that 302 should not need huge compensation adjustments (normally none). Check the plumbing carefully, it might be as simple as you actually have the static and TE lines crossed at the Cambridge (that would be the first thing to check - don't rely on the color or the tubing etc. (it might be spliced wrong you cant' see) really check there is a air pressure connection by blowing gently onto (not into!) the TE probe). Also simplify the problem. Block off any ports you really don't need. Check all connections carefully, etc. Block the other side of the *TE line where it splits. Double check that the IAS and pressure altitude on Cambridge all look OK (long shot but it may show up a problems). If you start to suspect the Cambridge, try just sticking it on the static line with 100% compensation and see what it does. But this really should not be needed. Darryl- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I have all new tubing and new capacity flasks. *The other two mechanical VSI seem to work well. *The cambridge works well too....unless I push forward to speed up or pull back fast to slow down. Does the 100% compensation and the two static line system work ok? SA All new tubing and all new capacity flasks probably leak more often than all old tubing and all old capacity flasks that have not had all new fingers poking around in them :-) Three varios? The TE line is split three ways beyond the seat and the two mechanical varios have their own capacity flasks right? The reason for splitting beyond the seat is just to give some line impedance so that the flow to/from the capacity flasks does not significantly affect the direct pressure reading 302. The electronic compensation and a static source works very well on a C302. I use that on mine, it provides a separate vario independent of the TE. However it is only as good as the static and pilot sources. I know Cambridge (Dave Ellis?) previously argued that a good TE probe was better than electronic compensation, but I can't tell the difference. However your ships seems to have something going wrong and instead of just changing things I personally would work out what the problem is first. I had misread the direction of the vario change when you said you pushed/pulled. So the other poster's suggestion that you have a big leak may be more likely. Does the behavior of you speed up/slow down test depend on the cockpit vents being full open of closed. If you were flying with the vents mostly open, speeding up could raise cockpit/fuselage internal pressure, causing a false climb indication. Has a tube fallen off somewhere? Is a right angle or "T" adapter cracked or fallen apart entirely. Are any lines blocked off, are the stoppers really secure/airtight? Do you have something else misconnected somewhere so that the TE line is actually open to the ambient cockpit pressure. Have you checked the tube has not fallen off the TE probe? Try making the circuit as simple as possible and remove any split behind the seat (in case you have a huge leak in a capacity or other vario case - unlikely though - if those other varios seem to work - but it is not clear if they actually show a climb when they should or if you are just saying they don't show false speed relate readings). If they don't show a climb when they should you could have a huge leak on the mechanical vario side that (in a stretch) could explain this. Is there an alt static source behind the panel, is it accidentally open? Is it plumbed in the correct line? You may be too close to the problem. Have somebody else sanity check what you have done and how you have debugged it. Be prepared to buy them a beer when they walk straight up point out the "obvious" error :-) Darryl |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Cambridge 302 Question
On Apr 19, 3:53*pm, wrote:
On Apr 19, 1:51*pm, wrote: I've have a Cambridge 302 in my glider. *I have the setting at 0% since I have the total energy probe fed into it, along with the pitot tube and static port. *The te tube is split just behind the cockpit as recommended. *The static and pitot are split or "t'd" behind the instrument panel. When I push hard forward to increase airspeed.....the cambridge VSI goes up to 10knots positive. Then when I pull back to bleed off airspeed.....the VSI goes down to 10 knots negative. The manual says to increase the % , but doesn't say how much. Another option is to not use the te tube and put it at 100%. The te probe in my glider is located about 6 feet behind the wing spar on the top of the fuselage. *It's not the conventional spot on the rudder. Any thoughts? *Recommendations? Scott, Go to screen 10 on the CAI 302 and note *the indicated airspeed. *You may have the Pitot & static switched. *Which mode are you in when this happens climb or Cruise? At TE probe requires that the Compensation be set at 0%. *The Probe supplies the Compensation. Richardwww.craggyaero.com To be clear, you can adjust the compensation when using a TE probe. Normally a small percentage to correct compensation issues, but usually not needed. The manual appears to say you *must* use 0 when using a TE probe. But this is wrong. And the manual also contradicts itself and explains you can do this tweaking. But none of that is of course related to the problem described here. Darryl |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Cambridge 302 Question
On Apr 19, 3:53*pm, wrote:
On Apr 19, 1:51*pm, wrote: I've have a Cambridge 302 in my glider. *I have the setting at 0% since I have the total energy probe fed into it, along with the pitot tube and static port. *The te tube is split just behind the cockpit as recommended. *The static and pitot are split or "t'd" behind the instrument panel. When I push hard forward to increase airspeed.....the cambridge VSI goes up to 10knots positive. Then when I pull back to bleed off airspeed.....the VSI goes down to 10 knots negative. The manual says to increase the % , but doesn't say how much. Another option is to not use the te tube and put it at 100%. The te probe in my glider is located about 6 feet behind the wing spar on the top of the fuselage. *It's not the conventional spot on the rudder. Any thoughts? *Recommendations? Scott, Go to screen 10 on the CAI 302 and note *the indicated airspeed. *You may have the Pitot & static switched. *Which mode are you in when this happens climb or Cruise? At TE probe requires that the Compensation be set at 0%. *The Probe supplies the Compensation. Richardwww.craggyaero.com And that was a clever suggestion - pitot and static swapped and the 302 in cruise mode and configured to be a super netto or netto vario so the indicator relies on the airspeed.... Note to Scott - the altimeter display on the 302 home screen has nothing to do with the static plumbing, it senses cockpit ambient pressure, so is cannot help debug this question. So try what Richard suggests. Darryl |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: 57mm Cambridge Vario/FS: 80mm Cambridge Vario | ufmechanic | Soaring | 0 | March 24th 09 05:31 PM |
Cambridge 302 & PDA -- Value of adding Cambridge 303? | V1 | Soaring | 5 | July 31st 07 03:51 AM |
Cambridge 302A/303/SNav question | Bob | Soaring | 7 | November 26th 06 03:46 PM |
Cambridge Fuse Question | Brian Iten | Soaring | 9 | January 4th 05 02:43 PM |
Cambridge 302/Cambridge 3UTIQ255 utility/ WinPilot/iPAQ 4155 | Nathan Whelchel | Soaring | 4 | July 5th 04 11:22 PM |