If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Mercury another threat to aviation security?
I just ran across this article and thought it was interesting. It's
reiteration of basic chemistry, but in light of recent history and given the motivation of some people in the world to hurt large groups of people traveling at high speed and high altitude in aluminum tubes, the thought scares me a bit. http://www.popsci.com/popsci/how2/ar...693558,00.html Terrorists have so many avenues of attack, I know, but this one seems like it wouldn't even be on the TSA's radar screens, and a silent but deadly attack could be unleashed by nothing more than a sufficiently motivated, mercury wielding criminal. Or would it not be that bad? Is aluminum destruction through contact with mercury really a potential threat, or is my imagination running wild? I can't imagine that a small, discrete amount of mercury could do much damage beyond a small area, but if it's a critical area, oh boy.... -Aviv ----------------------------- Full article: The Amazing Rusting Aluminum Theodore Gray Unless you are a representative of a national meteorological bureau licensed to carry a barometer (and odds are you’re not), bringing mercury onboard an airplane is strictly forbidden. Why? If it got loose, it could rust the plane to pieces before it had a chance to land. You see, airplanes are made of aluminum, and aluminum is highly unstable. Wait, isn’t one of the great things about aluminum that, unlike iron, it doesn’t rust? Am I talking about the same aluminum? Yes! Your aluminum pot is made of a highly reactive chemical. It simply has a trick that lets it disguise itself as a corrosion-resistant metal. When iron rusts, it forms iron oxide—a reddish, powdery substance that quickly flakes off to expose fresh metal, which immediately begins to rust, and so on until your muffler falls off. But when aluminum rusts, it forms aluminum oxide, an entirely different animal. In crystal form, aluminum oxide is called corundum, sapphire or ruby (depending on the color), and it is among the hardest substances known. If you wanted to design a strong, scratchproof coating to put on a metal, few things other than diamond would be better than aluminum oxide. By rusting, aluminum is forming a protective coating that’s chemically identical to sapphire—transparent, impervious to air and many chemicals, and able to protect the surface from further rusting: As soon as a microscopically thin layer has formed, the rusting stops. (“Anodized” aluminum has been treated with acid and electricity to force it to grow an extra-thick layer of rust, because the more you have on the surface, the stronger and more scratch-resistant it is.) This invisible barrier forms so quickly that aluminum seems, even in molten form, to be an inert metal. But this illusion can be shattered with aluminum’s archenemy, mercury. Applied to aluminum’s surface, mercury will infiltrate the metal and disrupt its protective coating, allowing it to “rust” (in the more destructive sense) continuously by preventing a new layer of oxide from forming. The aluminum I-beam below rusted half away in a few hours, something that would have taken an iron beam years. I’ve heard that during World War II, commandos were sent deep into German territory to smear mercury paste on aircraft to make them inexplicably fall apart. Whether the story is true or not, the sabotage would have worked. The few-micron-thick layer of aluminum oxide is the only thing holding an airplane together. Think about that the next time you’re flying. Or maybe it’s better if you don’t. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Aviv Hod" wrote in message
... [...] I can't imagine that a small, discrete amount of mercury could do much damage beyond a small area, but if it's a critical area, oh boy.... Even if the chemical reaction occurred as described (and it sure seems a little outlandish to me), I think the difficulty in obtaining mercury paste, along with the difficulty in gaining access to any "critical area" of the airplane would preclude there being any real threat. The access to a "critical area" in particular is a major impediment, even for light GA airplanes, never might transport category aircraft. Pete |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Aviv Hod wrote:
I just ran across this article and thought it was interesting. It's reiteration of basic chemistry, Doesn't even need to be metalic mercury...the mercurial salts are bad enough. I used to have a material sceince professor back in the seventies that said he was scared to fly because security was always looking for guns and he knew what held airplanes together and that a bottle of innocuous looking mercurial salts would kill him. He used to theorize about pooring it in the lav. The key is that you have to find some critical piece of EXPOSED aluminum to get it on. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
TSA's General Aviation Airport Security Recommendations Might Become Requirements | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 1 | February 25th 04 05:11 PM |
TSA Standards for General Aviation Airport Security | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | December 4th 03 02:54 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Bush Backs Down On Tower Privatization Issue!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 3 | October 1st 03 05:39 AM |