Another Addition to the Rec.Aviation Rogue's Gallery!

In article mGCOb.95717$na.51203@attbi_s04, Cy Galley
wrote:

Some people will complain even when hung with a new rope!

It's too rough. It itches my neck.

"Ed Wischmeyer" wrote:
Why is there ellipsis at the end of this sentence fragment?

Reduces tip losses with an ellipstical lift distribution...

Thanks. I always wondered about that, too.
whoops ...
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM
(remove pants to reply by email)

"EDR" wrote in message
...
In article mGCOb.95717$na.51203@attbi_s04, Cy Galley
wrote:

Some people will complain even when hung with a new rope!

It's too rough. It itches my neck.

....like wearing a neck tie! :~(

"karel adams" wrote in message
...

"Geoffrey Barnes" schreef in bericht
link.net...
You folks are great, and I really enjoy seeing what everyone is
flying --
it
makes the newsgroup experience just that much better.

Yes, it does, Jay. And thanks for hosting the pics. All those
screaming
"spam" have never even tried to either run a business or be polite to
another human being. Luckily, you are capable of doing both at once.


I'll heartily agree to that!
Even so, Jay would really better limit his site update messages
to once or twice monthly as someone else suggested
It's a bit overdone by now, I also was close to killfiling...
but Jay obviously IS a gentleman.
KA from far away little Belgium

Crips, get a clue people....the site is A reference to THIS NEWSGROUP AND
IT'S PARTICIPANTS.

"Scott McQ" wrote in message
...
In article , "G.R. Patterson III"
wrote:


Lance W wrote:

It
would be a mistake for Jay to take the support of a handful of his RAP
homeys as an indication of majority support in this.

I suspect that Jay's RAP friends ARE the majority.

George Patterson
Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually
said is
"Hummmmm... That's interesting...."

I doubt that they are the majority, just the loud ones.

I grew tired of his constant updates a while ago, and I
think most people did. I also think that the majority
decided as I did to toss his name into the killfile rather
than waste everybodies time complaining.

Considering the number of people who read it, I'd say your self-serving
estimate of the people that KF'd it is total bull****.


Now I don't have
to look at his updates, and I doubt that the majority of
readers see his posts. That is the reason that repetitive
spamming is a waste of time - it goes unseen by those you
want to reach with your message.


Yup...you're completely full of **** in numerous ways.

"Newps" wrote in message
news:CcLOb.97490$I06.432698@attbi_s01...


Scott McQ wrote:


I doubt that they are the majority, just the loud ones.

I grew tired of his constant updates a while ago, and I
think most people did. I also think that the majority
decided as I did to toss his name into the killfile rather
than waste everybodies time complaining. Now I don't have
to look at his updates, and I doubt that the majority of
readers see his posts. That is the reason that repetitive
spamming is a waste of time - it goes unseen by those you
want to reach with your message.

And yet you still reply.

He's trying for self-justification.

"Verbs Under My Gel" wrote in message
m...
Jerry Springer wrote in message
hlink.net...
Why does he need to remove foot? I agree with Ron, I like Jay and he
contributes
to this NG but I really don't think we need to know each time someone
posts to
his web site.

Jerry

Jay posts photos given him by the PARTICIPANTS OF THIS FORUM. For
free, at that. How hard would it be to filter these posts?

Not hard at all, but then he wouldn't have something to stoke his envy.

"EDR" wrote in message
...
In article , Tom Sixkiller
wrote:

Some people will complain even when hung with a new rope!

It's too rough. It itches my neck.

...like wearing a neck tie! :~(

Yep... it cuts off circulation to the brain.

And parts below.

In article , Tom Sixkiller
wrote:

Some people will complain even when hung with a new rope!

It's too rough. It itches my neck.

...like wearing a neck tie! :~(

Yep... it cuts off circulation to the brain.

"Tom Sixkiller" wrote:

Crips, get a clue people....the site is A reference to THIS NEWSGROUP AND
IT'S PARTICIPANTS.

You are the who needs the clue, Mr. "Sixkiller". The reference is to a
page on a commercial hotel website with full website menu, hotel
address, phone number, and solicitation along the left side of the
page.


To Jay,

Many commercial websites include ancillary information within their
site. After all, it is good business practice and generally leads to
good will and increased exposure in Google searches. The problem comes
when such a website attempts to increase exposure by posting frequent
"update" notices to usenet. As can be seen by the responses in this
thread, some people view such update notices as an advertising ploy
and resent it. In this thread I count six in favor, four against, and
two suggesting biweekly or monthly update notices. If your intention
is to please a relatively small group of "rogue gallery" participants
at the risk of ****ing off a silent majority then by all means
continue. As I noted earlier, there is a reason that websites do not
spam newsgroups with frequent update notices. Caveat vendor.