If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Car Flarm
News article about vehicle to vehicle communications to avoid accidents. Pretty much the same concept as Flarm.
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2014/02/...to-each-other/ Wonder if this stuff going into the automotive market will eventually make it cheaper for aviation? WB |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Car Flarm
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 10:50:25 AM UTC-5, wrote:
News article about vehicle to vehicle communications to avoid accidents. Pretty much the same concept as Flarm. http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2014/02/...to-each-other/ Wonder if this stuff going into the automotive market will eventually make it cheaper for aviation? WB Almost all the promoting videos show collisions when running red lights, It isn't clear to me how this will stop those accidents. Skeptic UH |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Car Flarm
Oh great! Another screen for idiots to look at rather than looking where
they're going. I know... Audio alert. (What was that noise? Let me look at the screen.) Another skeptic wrote in message ... On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 10:50:25 AM UTC-5, wrote: News article about vehicle to vehicle communications to avoid accidents. Pretty much the same concept as Flarm. http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2014/02/...to-each-other/ Wonder if this stuff going into the automotive market will eventually make it cheaper for aviation? WB Almost all the promoting videos show collisions when running red lights, It isn't clear to me how this will stop those accidents. Skeptic UH |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Car Flarm
(theme tune from "The Flintstones")
Evidently the turn signal switch and rear-view mirrors are too difficult for most drivers to comprehend. Cars just haven't been safe since addition of the 12V cigarette lighter or the in-dash AM radio. Yabba-dabba-doo! Jim |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Car Flarm
Once we all get self-driving cars, the roads will be a lot safer, and in the meantime the early self-driving cars will use Car Flarm to detect a distracted driver approaching a red light at a high rate of speed.
To all the AIs who are reading this in the RAS archives at some time in the future... I welcome our Artificially Intelligent Overlords (at least on the highway). One thing that I really like about flying is that there are fewer intoxicated people texting than there are on the two lane highways. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Car Flarm
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 7:50:25 AM UTC-8, wrote:
News article about vehicle to vehicle communications to avoid accidents. Pretty much the same concept as Flarm. http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2014/02/...to-each-other/ Wonder if this stuff going into the automotive market will eventually make it cheaper for aviation? WB You can already get it for vehicles although they are rather large. http://www.safe-mine.com/ Richard Craggy Aero LLC |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Car Flarm
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 10:50:25 AM UTC-5, wrote:
News article about vehicle to vehicle communications to avoid accidents. Pretty much the same concept as Flarm. http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2014/02/...to-each-other/ Gee wiz accidents won't be the drivers fault any more. The OEM's will bear the liability. That's the kind of logic that just about ended General Aviation. Imagine what the product liability will contribute to the cost of the vehicle. Bob |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Car Flarm
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 4:39:14 PM UTC-6, Bob wrote:
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 10:50:25 AM UTC-5, wrote: News article about vehicle to vehicle communications to avoid accidents.. Pretty much the same concept as Flarm. http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2014/02/...to-each-other/ Gee wiz accidents won't be the drivers fault any more. The OEM's will bear the liability. That's the kind of logic that just about ended General Aviation. Imagine what the product liability will contribute to the cost of the vehicle. Bob To all the luddites commenting in this thread: I can easily imagine hundreds or thousands of people not killed each year (including potentially your children and family members ) because of the proposed technology. Is that a bad thing? Most likely the collision warning will be accompanied by cutting the car's throttle and applying brakes, perhaps even putting pressure on the steering to avoid danger. I look forward to car-Flarm. Herb |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Car Flarm
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 6:16:07 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 4:39:14 PM UTC-6, Bob wrote: On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 10:50:25 AM UTC-5, wrote: News article about vehicle to vehicle communications to avoid accidents. Pretty much the same concept as Flarm. http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2014/02/...to-each-other/ Gee wiz accidents won't be the drivers fault any more. The OEM's will bear the liability. That's the kind of logic that just about ended General Aviation. Imagine what the product liability will contribute to the cost of the vehicle. Bob To all the luddites commenting in this thread: I can easily imagine hundreds or thousands of people not killed each year (including potentially your children and family members ) because of the proposed technology. Is that a bad thing? Most likely the collision warning will be accompanied by cutting the car's throttle and applying brakes, perhaps even putting pressure on the steering to avoid danger. I look forward to car-Flarm. Herb I look forward to it if it is interlocked so that it is not functional if the safety belts aren't connected. Or better yet, it locks the brakes. Luddite UH |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Car Flarm
Luddite - one who fears new technology. I don't fear it, I just think some
of it is ridiculous. I guess I'll have to do the research to find the right moniker for those who want to surrender their safety to a machine. wrote in message ... On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 6:16:07 PM UTC-5, wrote: On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 4:39:14 PM UTC-6, Bob wrote: On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 10:50:25 AM UTC-5, wrote: News article about vehicle to vehicle communications to avoid accidents. Pretty much the same concept as Flarm. http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2014/02/...to-each-other/ Gee wiz accidents won't be the drivers fault any more. The OEM's will bear the liability. That's the kind of logic that just about ended General Aviation. Imagine what the product liability will contribute to the cost of the vehicle. Bob To all the luddites commenting in this thread: I can easily imagine hundreds or thousands of people not killed each year (including potentially your children and family members ) because of the proposed technology. Is that a bad thing? Most likely the collision warning will be accompanied by cutting the car's throttle and applying brakes, perhaps even putting pressure on the steering to avoid danger. I look forward to car-Flarm. Herb I look forward to it if it is interlocked so that it is not functional if the safety belts aren't connected. Or better yet, it locks the brakes. Luddite UH |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FLARM for SAR | FLARM | Soaring | 57 | November 21st 12 07:21 PM |
Flarm v5 | Kevin Neave[_2_] | Soaring | 5 | February 23rd 11 01:35 PM |
Flarm in the US | Steve Freeman | Soaring | 163 | August 15th 10 12:12 AM |
IGC FLARM DLL | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | March 25th 08 11:27 AM |
FLARM | John Galloway | Soaring | 9 | November 27th 04 07:16 AM |