A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

DG goes the sustainer option.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old June 1st 04, 09:09 AM
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

BTIZ wrote:

to those of us converts from powered aircraft.. a turbo would signify more
power.. not less.. a turbo charger ramming more intake air into the
manifold..


Yes, that's a turbo charged engine. But in sailplanes, the term "turbo"
has a different, historical developed meaning. At the time the term was
introduced, "turbo" was a synonym for "better", "extra" etc. Hence the
term "turbo" was used for sailplanes with a sustainer. That's the whole
story. Technically as wrong as it can be, but who cares.

Stefan

  #12  
Old June 1st 04, 09:39 AM
Ian Johnston
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 08:09:33 UTC, Stefan
wrote:

: At the time the term was
: introduced, "turbo" was a synonym for "better", "extra" etc.

Somewhere - I must get round to throwing it out - I have a PC with a
"Turbo" button which runs the 386 inside it at an amazing 16MHz (12MHz
otherwise).

Ian
--

  #13  
Old June 1st 04, 11:04 AM
Bruce Hoult
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article cCUlhtvFIYkV-pn2-F8c8m9DhFJ44@localhost,
"Ian Johnston" wrote:

On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 08:09:33 UTC, Stefan
wrote:

: At the time the term was
: introduced, "turbo" was a synonym for "better", "extra" etc.

Somewhere - I must get round to throwing it out - I have a PC with a
"Turbo" button which runs the 386 inside it at an amazing 16MHz (12MHz
otherwise).


The original PC "turbo" buttons ran the machine at 8 MHz instead of 4.77
MHz!!
  #14  
Old June 1st 04, 11:07 AM
Bruce Hoult
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Stefan wrote:

BTIZ wrote:

to those of us converts from powered aircraft.. a turbo would signify more
power.. not less.. a turbo charger ramming more intake air into the
manifold..


Yes, that's a turbo charged engine. But in sailplanes, the term "turbo"
has a different, historical developed meaning. At the time the term was
introduced, "turbo" was a synonym for "better", "extra" etc. Hence the
term "turbo" was used for sailplanes with a sustainer. That's the whole
story. Technically as wrong as it can be, but who cares.


"turbo" applies perfectly well to a propellor ("turbine" in many
languages).

Given where they come from, if they were what we call "turbocharged" it
would proabbly say "Kompressor".

-- Bruce
  #15  
Old June 1st 04, 11:07 AM
Ian Johnston
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 10:04:14 UTC, Bruce Hoult wrote:

: In article cCUlhtvFIYkV-pn2-F8c8m9DhFJ44@localhost,
: "Ian Johnston" wrote:

: Somewhere - I must get round to throwing it out - I have a PC with a
: "Turbo" button which runs the 386 inside it at an amazing 16MHz (12MHz
: otherwise).
:
: The original PC "turbo" buttons ran the machine at 8 MHz instead of 4.77
: MHz!!

Whoops. Looks like I may not have quite such a star performer as I
thought...

Ian

--

  #16  
Old June 1st 04, 11:42 AM
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bruce Hoult wrote:

Given where they come from, if they were what we call "turbocharged" it
would proabbly say "Kompressor".


No. In German, Kompressor is used for a mechanically driven charger,
turbo for the exhaust driven charger.

Stefan

  #17  
Old June 1st 04, 01:29 PM
Bert Willing
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Errr, no. There is even a famous upperclass car manufacturer who uses the
word "Kompressor" for turbo-charged engines.

--
Bert Willing

ASW20 "TW"


"Stefan" a écrit dans le message de
...
Bruce Hoult wrote:

Given where they come from, if they were what we call "turbocharged" it
would proabbly say "Kompressor".


No. In German, Kompressor is used for a mechanically driven charger,
turbo for the exhaust driven charger.

Stefan



  #18  
Old June 1st 04, 02:15 PM
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bert Willing wrote:

Errr, no. There is even a famous upperclass car manufacturer who uses the
word "Kompressor" for turbo-charged engines.


Well, to be as correct as I can be:

"Kompressor" is the German word for, you guessed it, a compressor. So to
call a turbo charged engine a Kompressor charged one is, strictly
technically spoken, correct.

Historically, though, the first cars with charged engines had
mechanically driven compressors (driven by the crankshaft). They were
called Kompressor engines.

Then came the charged engines where the compressor was driven by the
exhaust stream. They were called turbo charged engines, just to
distinguish. Technically spoken, the "cold" side of the turbo charger is
a compressor, too, of course. I should be surprised if any marketing
guiy understands this.

Oh, and then came the sailplanes with a sustainer. They are called turbo
sailplanes, to distinguish them from self launchers. It's a crazy world
out there.

Stefan

  #19  
Old June 1st 04, 04:02 PM
Bert Willing
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, the exact technical term in German is "Verdichter" (which is also how
the compressor stages in a turbojet engine are called).
But that doesn't sound very sexy to the marketing guys, and the sailplane
"turbo" has a another context as already mentioned...

--
Bert Willing

ASW20 "TW"


"Stefan" a écrit dans le message de
...
Bert Willing wrote:

Errr, no. There is even a famous upperclass car manufacturer who uses

the
word "Kompressor" for turbo-charged engines.


Well, to be as correct as I can be:

"Kompressor" is the German word for, you guessed it, a compressor. So to
call a turbo charged engine a Kompressor charged one is, strictly
technically spoken, correct.

Historically, though, the first cars with charged engines had
mechanically driven compressors (driven by the crankshaft). They were
called Kompressor engines.

Then came the charged engines where the compressor was driven by the
exhaust stream. They were called turbo charged engines, just to
distinguish. Technically spoken, the "cold" side of the turbo charger is
a compressor, too, of course. I should be surprised if any marketing
guiy understands this.

Oh, and then came the sailplanes with a sustainer. They are called turbo
sailplanes, to distinguish them from self launchers. It's a crazy world
out there.

Stefan



  #20  
Old June 1st 04, 04:43 PM
Shawn Curry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Stefan wrote:
Bert Willing wrote:

Errr, no. There is even a famous upperclass car manufacturer who uses the
word "Kompressor" for turbo-charged engines.



Well, to be as correct as I can be:

"Kompressor" is the German word for, you guessed it, a compressor. So to
call a turbo charged engine a Kompressor charged one is, strictly
technically spoken, correct.

Historically, though, the first cars with charged engines had
mechanically driven compressors (driven by the crankshaft). They were
called Kompressor engines.


In the US, a belt driven compressor is called a "supercharger". In drag
racing its called a "blower", the engine is refered to as a "blown"
engine, cause that's what you end up with. ;-)

Then came the charged engines where the compressor was driven by the
exhaust stream. They were called turbo charged engines, just to
distinguish. Technically spoken, the "cold" side of the turbo charger is
a compressor, too, of course. I should be surprised if any marketing
guiy understands this.


turbocharged here too.

Oh, and then came the sailplanes with a sustainer. They are called turbo
sailplanes, to distinguish them from self launchers. It's a crazy world
out there.


They may call them turbo, but they sound like sewing machines to me. :-)

Shawn
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best Option for Private Pilot to Multi Commercial Instrument Ratings Hudson Valley Amusement Instrument Flight Rules 34 December 17th 04 09:25 PM
Boeing Boondoggle Larry Dighera Military Aviation 77 September 15th 04 02:39 AM
Naval Air Refueling Needs Deferred in Air Force Tanker Plan Henry J Cobb Military Aviation 47 May 22nd 04 03:36 AM
Lease with option to buy Jim Burns Owning 1 May 3rd 04 02:16 PM
Best dogfight gun? Bjørnar Bolsøy Military Aviation 317 January 24th 04 06:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.