If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
(USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type?
On Mar 30, 8:20*pm, Tuno wrote:
For as long as I've been flying anything, including and especially gliders, I've had a CFI endorse a cockpit checkout in my logbook, for any new aircraft type I flew. Can someone tell me what/who requires this? Is it strictly insurance companies, or is there a relevant FAR paragraph? The reason I'm asking is that when I went to the local gliderport yesterday to get a cockpit checkout in the LS-8, the on duty CFI declined to sign an endorsement conducted by someone else, and he would not do the checkout himself because he was not an LS-8 pilot. I can't imagine that every CFI is able to personally conduct cockpit checkouts in all glider types (with all due respect, Mr Compton). The last six such checkouts I've received were performed by a non-CFI and signed off by a CFI. ~ted/2n7o Ted, If I have no direct experience in type I make sure that the pilot has been briefed by someone that has. I then endorse to the effect that pilot name has been given a briefing for glider xx. I would have been happy to sign you off since I know both you and Ralph. Andy |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
(USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type?
I haven't had the privilege of instructing at a club where new glass
shows up regularly and these sort of checkouts are required by insurance companies. I assume that Costello does not accept a cockpit checkout to be endorsed by a non CFI-G? I wonder if they'd be willing to waive that requirement on a case by case basis. As an instructor i'm a bit hesitant to sign off on instruction that i didn't do or am not really qualified to do. but thats just me. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
(USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type?
On Mar 31, 9:19*am, "
wrote: On Mar 30, 11:20*pm, Tuno wrote: For as long as I've been flying anything, including and especially gliders, I've had a CFI endorse a cockpit checkout in my logbook, for any new aircraft type I flew. Can someone tell me what/who requires this? Is it strictly insurance companies, or is there a relevant FAR paragraph? The reason I'm asking is that when I went to the local gliderport yesterday to get a cockpit checkout in the LS-8, the on duty CFI declined to sign an endorsement conducted by someone else, and he would not do the checkout himself because he was not an LS-8 pilot. I can't imagine that every CFI is able to personally conduct cockpit checkouts in all glider types (with all due respect, Mr Compton). The last six such checkouts I've received were performed by a non-CFI and signed off by a CFI. ~ted/2n7o What's the big deal..? A cockpit checkout is pretty simple....just get the POH and sit down for a while and get familiar......a cockpit check out is not a flight check out..... I mean its like..ok, where's the flap handle?...ok now where's the spoiler handle?...ok release?...canopy jettison? etc...now let's make you're seat comfy... I have "cockpit checked" *lots of pilots in gliders models which I have not flown......Gliders are not all that different from one to another........If someone is around with personal experience in this model, I will definitely bring him in on the discussion....but not necessary.... If they guy just bought the New Super XL5000 glider....it is up to him to be flight competent...The pilot should consult with some experienced people to answer any questions on handling...special techniques, any quirks etc. *I have occasionaly suggested some more dual training and solo experience before the guy flies his new toy! Cookie- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The one thing I would add is that this does permit and requires the CFI, who presumably knows the pilot and his experience/skills to exercise an important judgement on whether the pilot is qualified to fly the type of glider he's asking to be checked out in UH |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
(USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type?
On Mar 31, 12:15*pm, wrote:
On Mar 31, 9:19*am, " wrote: On Mar 30, 11:20*pm, Tuno wrote: For as long as I've been flying anything, including and especially gliders, I've had a CFI endorse a cockpit checkout in my logbook, for any new aircraft type I flew. Can someone tell me what/who requires this? Is it strictly insurance companies, or is there a relevant FAR paragraph? The reason I'm asking is that when I went to the local gliderport yesterday to get a cockpit checkout in the LS-8, the on duty CFI declined to sign an endorsement conducted by someone else, and he would not do the checkout himself because he was not an LS-8 pilot. I can't imagine that every CFI is able to personally conduct cockpit checkouts in all glider types (with all due respect, Mr Compton). The last six such checkouts I've received were performed by a non-CFI and signed off by a CFI. ~ted/2n7o What's the big deal..? A cockpit checkout is pretty simple....just get the POH and sit down for a while and get familiar......a cockpit check out is not a flight check out..... I mean its like..ok, where's the flap handle?...ok now where's the spoiler handle?...ok release?...canopy jettison? etc...now let's make you're seat comfy... I have "cockpit checked" *lots of pilots in gliders models which I have not flown......Gliders are not all that different from one to another........If someone is around with personal experience in this model, I will definitely bring him in on the discussion....but not necessary.... If they guy just bought the New Super XL5000 glider....it is up to him to be flight competent...The pilot should consult with some experienced people to answer any questions on handling...special techniques, any quirks etc. *I have occasionaly suggested some more dual training and solo experience before the guy flies his new toy! Cookie- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The one thing I would add is that this does permit and requires the CFI, who presumably knows the pilot and his experience/skills to exercise an important judgement on whether the pilot is qualified to fly the type of glider he's asking to be checked out in UH We've had this discussion regularly in our club since we have a couple of one seaters (one glass) and a fair contingent of new owners over the years. The insurance policy is what requires the cockpit checkout -- Costello won't cover you unless you have a CFI endorsement logged for that particular glider. Checkout in type doesn't count. When we replaced our L33 we had to re-check everyone out to fly it. In my case when I was checked out to fly the glass ship it was done by a pilot with a fair bit of experience in the plane, with the duty CFI observing. Also note that there's more to a checkout than where the controls are; assembly of any plane has its quirks. The 304CZ parked next to mine at the airport has a new owner who's going through a fair bit of teething pain getting used to assembly. His previous plane stayed assembled in a hangar all year long so he's really not used to this. -- Matt |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
(USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type?
On Mar 31, 8:04*am, Tony wrote:
I haven't had the privilege of instructing at a club where new glass shows up regularly and these sort of checkouts are required by insurance companies. *I assume that Costello does not accept a cockpit checkout to be endorsed by a non CFI-G? *I wonder if they'd be willing to waive that requirement on a case by case basis. *As an instructor i'm a bit hesitant to sign off on instruction that i didn't do or am not really qualified to do. but thats just me. I carefully read what was required by the insurance policy and was satisfied that my endorsement was compatible with the policy requirements. I have never provided an endorement that stated that I gave instruction that I did not actually give. "Has been given" does not assert that "I gave". Andy |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
(USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type?
I don't mind giving a cockpit checkout in gliders I have not flown. My
statement says simply that the pilot has read the POH and that I have conducted a review of the instruments and flight controls, and then sign that statement. Actually I do more than that; I have a 2-page checklist that covers questions about the documentation, special restrictions, static source, tow hitch, baggage compartment, aircraft AD compliance, etc. None of that gets mentioned in the logbook entry and I warn the pilot that I am not endorsing flight. This is about the aircraft and not about the pilot. the At 17:43 31 March 2011, Andy wrote: On Mar 31, 8:04=A0am, Tony wrote: I haven't had the privilege of instructing at a club where new glass shows up regularly and these sort of checkouts are required by insurance companies. =A0I assume that Costello does not accept a cockpit checkout to be endorsed by a non CFI-G? =A0I wonder if they'd be willing to waive that requirement on a case by case basis. =A0As an instructor i'm a bit hesitant to sign off on instruction that i didn't do or am not really qualified to do. but thats just me. I carefully read what was required by the insurance policy and was satisfied that my endorsement was compatible with the policy requirements. I have never provided an endorement that stated that I gave instruction that I did not actually give. "Has been given" does not assert that "I gave". Andy |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
(USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type?
On Mar 31, 12:57*pm, mattm wrote:
On Mar 31, 12:15*pm, wrote: On Mar 31, 9:19*am, " wrote: On Mar 30, 11:20*pm, Tuno wrote: For as long as I've been flying anything, including and especially gliders, I've had a CFI endorse a cockpit checkout in my logbook, for any new aircraft type I flew. Can someone tell me what/who requires this? Is it strictly insurance companies, or is there a relevant FAR paragraph? The reason I'm asking is that when I went to the local gliderport yesterday to get a cockpit checkout in the LS-8, the on duty CFI declined to sign an endorsement conducted by someone else, and he would not do the checkout himself because he was not an LS-8 pilot. I can't imagine that every CFI is able to personally conduct cockpit checkouts in all glider types (with all due respect, Mr Compton). The last six such checkouts I've received were performed by a non-CFI and signed off by a CFI. ~ted/2n7o What's the big deal..? A cockpit checkout is pretty simple....just get the POH and sit down for a while and get familiar......a cockpit check out is not a flight check out..... I mean its like..ok, where's the flap handle?...ok now where's the spoiler handle?...ok release?...canopy jettison? etc...now let's make you're seat comfy... I have "cockpit checked" *lots of pilots in gliders models which I have not flown......Gliders are not all that different from one to another........If someone is around with personal experience in this model, I will definitely bring him in on the discussion....but not necessary.... If they guy just bought the New Super XL5000 glider....it is up to him to be flight competent...The pilot should consult with some experienced people to answer any questions on handling...special techniques, any quirks etc. *I have occasionaly suggested some more dual training and solo experience before the guy flies his new toy! Cookie- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The one thing I would add is that this does permit and requires the CFI, who presumably knows the pilot and his experience/skills to exercise an important judgement on whether the pilot is qualified to fly the type of glider he's asking to be checked out in UH We've had this discussion regularly in our club since we have a couple of one seaters (one glass) and a fair contingent of new owners over the years. *The insurance policy is what requires the cockpit checkout -- Costello won't cover you unless you have a CFI endorsement logged for that particular glider. *Checkout in type doesn't count. *When we replaced our L33 we had to re-check everyone out to fly it. In my case when I was checked out to fly the glass ship it was done by a pilot with a fair bit of experience in the plane, with the duty CFI observing. *Also note that there's more to a checkout than where the controls are; assembly of any plane has its quirks. *The 304CZ parked next to mine at the airport has a new owner who's going through a fair bit of teething pain getting used to assembly. *His previous plane stayed assembled in a hangar all year long so he's really not used to this. -- Matt- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I think you have gone beyond a "cockpit" check out, when you get into "assembly" check out.... Does the insurance companies specify what they consider as the items to be covered during a "cockpit check out" ? They do seem to specify CFI as the qualified person.... I don't think the pilot with a new plane or his insurance company should consider a "cockpit check out" to entail a check out of every nook and cranny, assembly, flight envelope, blah blah blah..etc... The pilot is certainly entitled to, encougaged to, seek out advise and expertise far beyond the cockpit check out....Common sense dictates this...but the OP was about insurance requirement... The ultimate responsibility falls on the pilot in command here...not the instructor who signs ..."cockpit check completed as equired by insurance co." But as far as the FAA, a person holding a glider certificate..private or higher, is qualified to fly any glider.... The isnurance company has additional requirements, like certain total hours, experience in level of performance etc.....but they don't determine whether the pilot is qualifed to fly the glider or not....their requirements determine whether the pilot qualifies for insurance coverage..or not Cookie |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
(USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type?
On Mar 30, 9:00*pm, bildan wrote:
An instructor endorsement for a cockpit checkout is imposed by insurance companies not the FAR's. *I understand your local instructor's attitude, I'm very reluctant to endorse logbooks for single seat gliders in which I have no experience. I have been on the other side of this scenario needing an endorsement. *My approach was to go to considerable lengths to find an instructor who had considerable experience in the type if not actually owned one. *My objective was to learn enough from him to fly the thing safely and well. *The insurance requirement was secondary. Bill D So how does a pilot taking the first US delivery of a new glider type ever get a checkout? And If that guy somehow manages it and isn't himself a CFI, how does the second pilot taking delivery of that type get checked out? Seems to me like the spirit of the requirement would not necessarily require the CFI to have experience in type, or even be witness to a briefing by someone with experience in type. 9B |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
(USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type?
On Mar 31, 11:45*pm, Andy wrote:
On Mar 30, 9:00*pm, bildan wrote: An instructor endorsement for a cockpit checkout is imposed by insurance companies not the FAR's. *I understand your local instructor's attitude, I'm very reluctant to endorse logbooks for single seat gliders in which I have no experience. I have been on the other side of this scenario needing an endorsement. *My approach was to go to considerable lengths to find an instructor who had considerable experience in the type if not actually owned one. *My objective was to learn enough from him to fly the thing safely and well. *The insurance requirement was secondary. Bill D So how does a pilot taking the first US delivery of a new glider type ever get a checkout? *And If that guy somehow manages it and isn't himself a CFI, how does the second pilot taking delivery of that type get checked out? Seems to me like the spirit of the requirement would not necessarily require the CFI to have experience in type, or even be witness to a briefing by someone with experience in type. 9B Right.... Because, any "glider" Instructor is qualified to teach in any glider.....whether he ever flew it or not.....and a "glider pilot" is qualified to fly in any glider, with or without a 'checkout'....and the isurance company only specifies a cockpit check by a CFI.....(no requirement of experience in make in model blah blah blah) Cookie |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
(USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type?
At 03:45 01 April 2011, Andy wrote:
Seems to me like the spirit of the requirement would not necessarily require the CFI to have experience in type, or even be witness to a briefing by someone with experience in type. Seems to me the safest thing to do is just call the insurance company, explain the circumstances, and ask what they would consider an acceptable checkout. Phone calls are cheap. Insurance claims aren't. Jim Beckman |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
English Endorsement | Dallas | Piloting | 10 | March 26th 08 04:07 AM |
tailwheel endorsement | Jose | Piloting | 65 | April 27th 06 01:59 AM |
TW Endorsement Completed | [email protected] | Piloting | 7 | May 9th 05 12:00 AM |
Marfa Endorsement | Robert de León | Soaring | 0 | April 12th 04 06:01 PM |
Tailwheel endorsement | John Harper | Piloting | 58 | December 12th 03 01:48 PM |