A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

(USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old March 31st 11, 03:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Andy[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,565
Default (USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type?

On Mar 30, 8:20*pm, Tuno wrote:
For as long as I've been flying anything, including and especially
gliders, I've had a CFI endorse a cockpit checkout in my logbook, for
any new aircraft type I flew.

Can someone tell me what/who requires this? Is it strictly insurance
companies, or is there a relevant FAR paragraph?

The reason I'm asking is that when I went to the local gliderport
yesterday to get a cockpit checkout in the LS-8, the on duty CFI
declined to sign an endorsement conducted by someone else, and he
would not do the checkout himself because he was not an LS-8 pilot.

I can't imagine that every CFI is able to personally conduct cockpit
checkouts in all glider types (with all due respect, Mr Compton).

The last six such checkouts I've received were performed by a non-CFI
and signed off by a CFI.

~ted/2n7o


Ted,

If I have no direct experience in type I make sure that the pilot has
been briefed by someone that has. I then endorse to the effect that
pilot name has been given a briefing for glider xx.

I would have been happy to sign you off since I know both you and
Ralph.

Andy
  #12  
Old March 31st 11, 04:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Tony[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,965
Default (USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type?

I haven't had the privilege of instructing at a club where new glass
shows up regularly and these sort of checkouts are required by
insurance companies. I assume that Costello does not accept a cockpit
checkout to be endorsed by a non CFI-G? I wonder if they'd be willing
to waive that requirement on a case by case basis. As an instructor
i'm a bit hesitant to sign off on instruction that i didn't do or am
not really qualified to do. but thats just me.

  #13  
Old March 31st 11, 05:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,124
Default (USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type?

On Mar 31, 9:19*am, "
wrote:
On Mar 30, 11:20*pm, Tuno wrote:





For as long as I've been flying anything, including and especially
gliders, I've had a CFI endorse a cockpit checkout in my logbook, for
any new aircraft type I flew.


Can someone tell me what/who requires this? Is it strictly insurance
companies, or is there a relevant FAR paragraph?


The reason I'm asking is that when I went to the local gliderport
yesterday to get a cockpit checkout in the LS-8, the on duty CFI
declined to sign an endorsement conducted by someone else, and he
would not do the checkout himself because he was not an LS-8 pilot.


I can't imagine that every CFI is able to personally conduct cockpit
checkouts in all glider types (with all due respect, Mr Compton).


The last six such checkouts I've received were performed by a non-CFI
and signed off by a CFI.


~ted/2n7o


What's the big deal..?

A cockpit checkout is pretty simple....just get the POH and sit down
for a while and get familiar......a cockpit check out is not a flight
check out.....

I mean its like..ok, where's the flap handle?...ok now where's the
spoiler handle?...ok release?...canopy jettison? etc...now let's make
you're seat comfy...

I have "cockpit checked" *lots of pilots in gliders models which I
have not flown......Gliders are not all that different from one to
another........If someone is around with personal experience in this
model, I will definitely bring him in on the discussion....but not
necessary....

If they guy just bought the New Super XL5000 glider....it is up to him
to be flight competent...The pilot should consult with some
experienced people to answer any questions on handling...special
techniques, any quirks etc. *I have occasionaly suggested some more
dual training and solo experience before the guy flies his new toy!

Cookie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


The one thing I would add is that this does permit and requires the
CFI, who presumably knows the pilot and his experience/skills to
exercise an important judgement on whether the pilot is qualified to
fly the type of glider he's asking to be checked out in
UH
  #14  
Old March 31st 11, 05:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
mattm[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 167
Default (USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type?

On Mar 31, 12:15*pm, wrote:
On Mar 31, 9:19*am, "



wrote:
On Mar 30, 11:20*pm, Tuno wrote:


For as long as I've been flying anything, including and especially
gliders, I've had a CFI endorse a cockpit checkout in my logbook, for
any new aircraft type I flew.


Can someone tell me what/who requires this? Is it strictly insurance
companies, or is there a relevant FAR paragraph?


The reason I'm asking is that when I went to the local gliderport
yesterday to get a cockpit checkout in the LS-8, the on duty CFI
declined to sign an endorsement conducted by someone else, and he
would not do the checkout himself because he was not an LS-8 pilot.


I can't imagine that every CFI is able to personally conduct cockpit
checkouts in all glider types (with all due respect, Mr Compton).


The last six such checkouts I've received were performed by a non-CFI
and signed off by a CFI.


~ted/2n7o


What's the big deal..?


A cockpit checkout is pretty simple....just get the POH and sit down
for a while and get familiar......a cockpit check out is not a flight
check out.....


I mean its like..ok, where's the flap handle?...ok now where's the
spoiler handle?...ok release?...canopy jettison? etc...now let's make
you're seat comfy...


I have "cockpit checked" *lots of pilots in gliders models which I
have not flown......Gliders are not all that different from one to
another........If someone is around with personal experience in this
model, I will definitely bring him in on the discussion....but not
necessary....


If they guy just bought the New Super XL5000 glider....it is up to him
to be flight competent...The pilot should consult with some
experienced people to answer any questions on handling...special
techniques, any quirks etc. *I have occasionaly suggested some more
dual training and solo experience before the guy flies his new toy!


Cookie- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


The one thing I would add is that this does permit and requires the
CFI, who presumably knows the pilot and his experience/skills to
exercise an important judgement on whether the pilot is qualified to
fly the type of glider he's asking to be checked out in
UH


We've had this discussion regularly in our club since we have a couple
of one seaters (one glass) and a fair contingent of new owners over
the
years. The insurance policy is what requires the cockpit checkout --
Costello won't cover you unless you have a CFI endorsement logged
for that particular glider. Checkout in type doesn't count. When we
replaced our L33 we had to re-check everyone out to fly it.

In my case when I was checked out to fly the glass ship it was done
by a pilot with a fair bit of experience in the plane, with the duty
CFI
observing. Also note that there's more to a checkout than where
the controls are; assembly of any plane has its quirks. The 304CZ
parked next to mine at the airport has a new owner who's going
through a fair bit of teething pain getting used to assembly. His
previous plane stayed assembled in a hangar all year long so he's
really not used to this.

-- Matt
  #15  
Old March 31st 11, 06:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Andy[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,565
Default (USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type?

On Mar 31, 8:04*am, Tony wrote:
I haven't had the privilege of instructing at a club where new glass
shows up regularly and these sort of checkouts are required by
insurance companies. *I assume that Costello does not accept a cockpit
checkout to be endorsed by a non CFI-G? *I wonder if they'd be willing
to waive that requirement on a case by case basis. *As an instructor
i'm a bit hesitant to sign off on instruction that i didn't do or am
not really qualified to do. but thats just me.


I carefully read what was required by the insurance policy and was
satisfied that my endorsement was compatible with the policy
requirements.

I have never provided an endorement that stated that I gave
instruction that I did not actually give. "Has been given" does not
assert that "I gave".

Andy
  #16  
Old March 31st 11, 11:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Nyal Williams[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 259
Default (USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type?

I don't mind giving a cockpit checkout in gliders I have not flown. My
statement says simply that the pilot has read the POH and that I have
conducted a review of the instruments and flight controls, and then sign
that statement.

Actually I do more than that; I have a 2-page checklist that covers
questions about the documentation, special restrictions, static source,
tow hitch, baggage compartment, aircraft AD compliance, etc. None of that
gets mentioned in the logbook entry and I warn the pilot that I am not
endorsing flight. This is about the aircraft and not about the pilot.


the At 17:43 31 March 2011, Andy wrote:
On Mar 31, 8:04=A0am, Tony wrote:
I haven't had the privilege of instructing at a club where new glass
shows up regularly and these sort of checkouts are required by
insurance companies. =A0I assume that Costello does not accept a

cockpit
checkout to be endorsed by a non CFI-G? =A0I wonder if they'd be

willing
to waive that requirement on a case by case basis. =A0As an instructor
i'm a bit hesitant to sign off on instruction that i didn't do or am
not really qualified to do. but thats just me.


I carefully read what was required by the insurance policy and was
satisfied that my endorsement was compatible with the policy
requirements.

I have never provided an endorement that stated that I gave
instruction that I did not actually give. "Has been given" does not
assert that "I gave".

Andy


  #17  
Old April 1st 11, 02:14 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 194
Default (USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type?

On Mar 31, 12:57*pm, mattm wrote:
On Mar 31, 12:15*pm, wrote:





On Mar 31, 9:19*am, "


wrote:
On Mar 30, 11:20*pm, Tuno wrote:


For as long as I've been flying anything, including and especially
gliders, I've had a CFI endorse a cockpit checkout in my logbook, for
any new aircraft type I flew.


Can someone tell me what/who requires this? Is it strictly insurance
companies, or is there a relevant FAR paragraph?


The reason I'm asking is that when I went to the local gliderport
yesterday to get a cockpit checkout in the LS-8, the on duty CFI
declined to sign an endorsement conducted by someone else, and he
would not do the checkout himself because he was not an LS-8 pilot.


I can't imagine that every CFI is able to personally conduct cockpit
checkouts in all glider types (with all due respect, Mr Compton).


The last six such checkouts I've received were performed by a non-CFI
and signed off by a CFI.


~ted/2n7o


What's the big deal..?


A cockpit checkout is pretty simple....just get the POH and sit down
for a while and get familiar......a cockpit check out is not a flight
check out.....


I mean its like..ok, where's the flap handle?...ok now where's the
spoiler handle?...ok release?...canopy jettison? etc...now let's make
you're seat comfy...


I have "cockpit checked" *lots of pilots in gliders models which I
have not flown......Gliders are not all that different from one to
another........If someone is around with personal experience in this
model, I will definitely bring him in on the discussion....but not
necessary....


If they guy just bought the New Super XL5000 glider....it is up to him
to be flight competent...The pilot should consult with some
experienced people to answer any questions on handling...special
techniques, any quirks etc. *I have occasionaly suggested some more
dual training and solo experience before the guy flies his new toy!


Cookie- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


The one thing I would add is that this does permit and requires the
CFI, who presumably knows the pilot and his experience/skills to
exercise an important judgement on whether the pilot is qualified to
fly the type of glider he's asking to be checked out in
UH


We've had this discussion regularly in our club since we have a couple
of one seaters (one glass) and a fair contingent of new owners over
the
years. *The insurance policy is what requires the cockpit checkout --
Costello won't cover you unless you have a CFI endorsement logged
for that particular glider. *Checkout in type doesn't count. *When we
replaced our L33 we had to re-check everyone out to fly it.

In my case when I was checked out to fly the glass ship it was done
by a pilot with a fair bit of experience in the plane, with the duty
CFI
observing. *Also note that there's more to a checkout than where
the controls are; assembly of any plane has its quirks. *The 304CZ
parked next to mine at the airport has a new owner who's going
through a fair bit of teething pain getting used to assembly. *His
previous plane stayed assembled in a hangar all year long so he's
really not used to this.

-- Matt- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


I think you have gone beyond a "cockpit" check out, when you get into
"assembly" check out....

Does the insurance companies specify what they consider as the items
to be covered during a "cockpit check out" ? They do seem to
specify CFI as the qualified person....

I don't think the pilot with a new plane or his insurance company
should consider a "cockpit check out" to entail a check out of every
nook and cranny, assembly, flight envelope, blah blah blah..etc...

The pilot is certainly entitled to, encougaged to, seek out advise and
expertise far beyond the cockpit check out....Common sense dictates
this...but the OP was about insurance requirement...

The ultimate responsibility falls on the pilot in command here...not
the instructor who signs ..."cockpit check completed as equired by
insurance co."

But as far as the FAA, a person holding a glider certificate..private
or higher, is qualified to fly any glider....
The isnurance company has additional requirements, like certain total
hours, experience in level of performance etc.....but they don't
determine whether the pilot is qualifed to fly the glider or
not....their requirements determine whether the pilot qualifies for
insurance coverage..or not

Cookie
  #18  
Old April 1st 11, 04:45 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Andy[_10_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 261
Default (USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type?

On Mar 30, 9:00*pm, bildan wrote:
An instructor endorsement for a cockpit checkout is imposed by
insurance companies not the FAR's. *I understand your local
instructor's attitude, I'm very reluctant to endorse logbooks for
single seat gliders in which I have no experience.

I have been on the other side of this scenario needing an
endorsement. *My approach was to go to considerable lengths to find an
instructor who had considerable experience in the type if not actually
owned one. *My objective was to learn enough from him to fly the thing
safely and well. *The insurance requirement was secondary.

Bill D


So how does a pilot taking the first US delivery of a new glider type
ever get a checkout? And If that guy somehow manages it and isn't
himself a CFI, how does the second pilot taking delivery of that type
get checked out?

Seems to me like the spirit of the requirement would not necessarily
require the CFI to have experience in type, or even be witness to a
briefing by someone with experience in type.

9B
  #19  
Old April 1st 11, 11:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 194
Default (USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type?

On Mar 31, 11:45*pm, Andy wrote:
On Mar 30, 9:00*pm, bildan wrote:

An instructor endorsement for a cockpit checkout is imposed by
insurance companies not the FAR's. *I understand your local
instructor's attitude, I'm very reluctant to endorse logbooks for
single seat gliders in which I have no experience.


I have been on the other side of this scenario needing an
endorsement. *My approach was to go to considerable lengths to find an
instructor who had considerable experience in the type if not actually
owned one. *My objective was to learn enough from him to fly the thing
safely and well. *The insurance requirement was secondary.


Bill D


So how does a pilot taking the first US delivery of a new glider type
ever get a checkout? *And If that guy somehow manages it and isn't
himself a CFI, how does the second pilot taking delivery of that type
get checked out?

Seems to me like the spirit of the requirement would not necessarily
require the CFI to have experience in type, or even be witness to a
briefing by someone with experience in type.

9B


Right....

Because, any "glider" Instructor is qualified to teach in any
glider.....whether he ever flew it or not.....and a "glider pilot" is
qualified to fly in any glider, with or without a 'checkout'....and
the isurance company only specifies a cockpit check by a CFI.....(no
requirement of experience in make in model blah blah blah)

Cookie
  #20  
Old April 1st 11, 03:23 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Jim Beckman[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 186
Default (USA) logbook endorsement requirement(s) for new glider type?

At 03:45 01 April 2011, Andy wrote:

Seems to me like the spirit of the requirement would not necessarily
require the CFI to have experience in type, or even be witness to a
briefing by someone with experience in type.


Seems to me the safest thing to do is just call the insurance company,
explain the circumstances, and ask what they would consider an acceptable
checkout. Phone calls are cheap. Insurance claims aren't.

Jim Beckman


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
English Endorsement Dallas Piloting 10 March 26th 08 04:07 AM
tailwheel endorsement Jose Piloting 65 April 27th 06 01:59 AM
TW Endorsement Completed [email protected] Piloting 7 May 9th 05 12:00 AM
Marfa Endorsement Robert de León Soaring 0 April 12th 04 06:01 PM
Tailwheel endorsement John Harper Piloting 58 December 12th 03 01:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.