If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Odd missed approach instructions
The published missed for the RNAV (GPS) RWY 04 at KROC says "Climb to 3000
direct CISON WP and via 098(degree) track to BREIT WP and hold". I'm trying to think why they'd put in that "098 track" thing instead of just saying "direct BRIET WP". The plan view makes it look like after crossing CISON you'd have to fly about 135 degrees to intercept the 098 track somewhere before BRIET. Are they trying to keep you clear of that 1030' obstacle just north west of BREIT? I was reading it as if you had to be at 3000' before you got to CISON, but I suppose you could read it that you're still on your way up to 3000' on the way between CISON and BREIT? -- Paul Tomblin http://blog.xcski.com/ "Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded if you tied them the usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers, and nobody thinks of complaining." -- Jef Raskin, interviewed in Doctor Dobb's Journal |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Full deflection = missed approach ??? | pgbnh | Instrument Flight Rules | 33 | October 21st 05 01:57 PM |
Missed approach (?) when glideslope fails | Yossarian | Instrument Flight Rules | 61 | September 22nd 05 05:01 AM |
GPS missed approach question | xyzzy | Instrument Flight Rules | 15 | September 15th 05 02:24 AM |
Approach Question- Published Missed Can't be flown? | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | May 6th 04 04:19 AM |
Missed approach procedure... | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 39 | November 11th 03 03:46 PM |