A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

PowerFlarms at Avenal Contest



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old May 24th 12, 07:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dave[_26_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default PowerFlarms at Avenal Contest

On Thursday, May 24, 2012 10:17:13 AM UTC-6, Bart wrote:
On May 23, 10:47*pm, bumper wrote:
There are a few reasons that one PF equipped aircraft might "alert" while the other conflicting aircraft doesn't.

In a perfect world it should be a two way street. However, the installation or placement of an antenna for transmitting is more critical than that for a recieve antenna. If glider #1's PF antenna is installed less optimally than glider #2's PF antenna, it may well be that #1 gets the alert while #2 does not. As #1's poor antenna install may receive marginally well, but wastes transmit power due to a high SWR or a null due to blocking structure.


Oh. PF uses one antenna to transmit and another to receive?

Bart


PF uses FLARM port A to transmit and receive. It uses FLARM port B to receive only. There is a third port for the transponder/ADS-B receive function. And the brick adds a fourth connector for remote GPS antenna.





On Thursday, May 24, 2012 10:17:13 AM UTC-6, Bart wrote:
On May 23, 10:47*pm, bumper wrote:
There are a few reasons that one PF equipped aircraft might "alert" while the other conflicting aircraft doesn't.

In a perfect world it should be a two way street. However, the installation or placement of an antenna for transmitting is more critical than that for a recieve antenna. If glider #1's PF antenna is installed less optimally than glider #2's PF antenna, it may well be that #1 gets the alert while #2 does not. As #1's poor antenna install may receive marginally well, but wastes transmit power due to a high SWR or a null due to blocking structure.


Oh. PF uses one antenna to transmit and another to receive?

Bart


Here's the excerpt from the manual:
"BRICK has two separate FLARM radio transceivers: FLARM A is used to receive and transmit and must always be connected to an antenna; FLARM B is only used to receive, an optional antenna may be used for better reception performance."

Its the same for both portable and brick versions. Although the portable only has the FLARM A connector with reverse polarity (via a staked on connector adapter".

With the 2 antenna setup in use there could easily be regions where you have receive coverage but not transmit coverage.

-Dave
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Avenal Contest, Still Needs Tuggies sisu1a Soaring 0 February 27th 09 05:06 PM
Avenal, USA Contest Maps 2007 Downloads Mario Crosina Soaring 0 April 20th 07 07:45 PM
Avenal Contest [email protected] Soaring 0 April 12th 07 04:55 PM
Avenal Contest [email protected] Soaring 0 April 12th 07 04:20 PM
33rd Annual CCSC Contest, Avenal USA Mario Crosina Soaring 0 April 9th 07 03:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.