Sebring and Hitlaw

"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message
...

"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message
...
In article , Juan Jimenez
says...

Is that kinda like the joys of peer pressure when beloved billionaire war
heros die in things you build?

The NTSB probable cause says it all my conscience is clear .But I do
feel bad
it happened.

good thing my son will never have to sue me to get paid for honest work.
nor
will he ever have to worry about child abuse.


Once again I'll ask what son sued me for "honest work" Name please ,when
etc.
Credibility jaunita ,it's about credibility .

Child abuse?? What child abuse?? Same reply what child ,when ,where?
Credibility
jaun ,it's about credibility and you still have none. Prove what you say
that's
all. What a phony you are and I bet your son is just as bad :-)

I don't have to prove it, kiddo. My son has never had to sue me to get
paid for work he does for me, and he has never been abused. If you know
otherwise, let us know.

What's the matter, Chucksteak, something ring a bell?

I sure am glad MY son never had to pretend he didn't know me because of
something I said in public!

Highflyer

I could have sworn you said you had some certificate in computer
networking or something like that? Do you have some sort of paperwork
that says you are "computer literate"? If so, another poster (and
myself) think you should have been able to find a Hitlaw in the database
with some sort of computer training you said you have. Whether or not
it is the same person you repeatedly speak about is irrelevant. You
apparently did not get a single hit on "Hitlaw". Several of us did.

Scott


Juan Jimenez wrote:

"olympusE1" wrote in message
ps.com...

...if you have indeed "checked that already" then why is it that you, a
"Certified Computer Network expert"


You must be thinking of the wrong person, or else you're making the common
mistake of parroting what other RAH gagglers say, Alan. Bad idea.


I'm sorry, but I just don't believe you.


Well, then you're making yet another common mistakes, that of thinking I
care.

In article . com, BobR says...

Standard Zoom and Jaun technique...when the FACTS are presented and
they don't support their lie, either deny the facts, deny they said
that, or change the argument. In this case, its all three. At least
one of Jaun's statements were true...HE COULDN'T FIND Hitlaw in the
database. That fact shouldn't be a surprise for anyone here.

Hats off to those who ARE computer savvy enough to have caught jaun in his own
incompetence. Ya never know who's the person behind the name tag "or" what they
know. Time and time again I've seen the brightest,the smartest the most
experienced never say much on their own behalf or toot their own horn.

As Sister Mary Holy Smoke used to say "an empty can makes the most
noise".However when needed these "real experts" come out and show that the
loudmouth is just that a loudmouth. I love when that happens and kudos to you
all.

Over the years of the zoom wars I've seen this happen a few times.Such as the
time zoom was boasting about pulling in excess of 10 g's positive and 9 negative
in a Sukoi. As you can imagine those of us who put up a resistance to such
statements caught holy hell from his zoomness for attacking him. One respondent
seemed to be quite knowledgeable the the effects of G forces on the human body.
After a heated exchange between zoom and that person where zoom said that that
person didn't know what they were talking about.

That person posted who they were and where they worked.Turns out she was a
Medical Dr and Engineer at some centrifuge facility and did G studies every day.
zoom as usual tucked tail and ran.Just like jaun is doing or will do shortly. It
is now known as "the Battle of the Sukoi G's" and is worth a combat ribbon for
the participants.

The same when zoom posted under a different name and swore it wasn't him.An
English Major who taught at a Major University promptly showed that zoom was the
author of the posts by comparing the posts and the distinctive writing style of
zoom. Now known as the "Battle of the ellipses"

Then the time zoom didn't know who was countering him on legal matters saying
that this guy didn't know what he was talking about. I bet zoom rues the day he
threatened that poster with a lawsuit then found out he just threatened a
lawyer. That was zooms introduction to Tony Pucillo .I bet zoom has regretted
telling Tony "he's in violation of law and my attorney has been notified".

There are other instances but the lesson here is to be truthful about who you
are and don't pick fights with someone who may be smarter then you :-) jaun and
zoom are so alike it's bizarre. This time jaun once again proved that he lacks
credibility and is also incompetent on a computeras well. Life can be good :-)

Chuck S RAH 14-1 ret

"credibility it was always about credibility" chuck s

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
In article . com, BobR says...

Standard Zoom and Jaun technique...when the FACTS are presented and
they don't support their lie, either deny the facts, deny they said
that, or change the argument. In this case, its all three. At least
one of Jaun's statements were true...HE COULDN'T FIND Hitlaw in the
database. That fact shouldn't be a surprise for anyone here.

Hats off to those who ARE computer savvy enough to have caught jaun in his own
incompetence. Ya never know who's the person behind the name tag "or" what they
know. Time and time again I've seen the brightest,the smartest the most
experienced never say much on their own behalf or toot their own horn.

As Sister Mary Holy Smoke used to say "an empty can makes the most
noise".However when needed these "real experts" come out and show that the
loudmouth is just that a loudmouth. I love when that happens and kudos to you
all.

Over the years of the zoom wars I've seen this happen a few times.Such as the
time zoom was boasting about pulling in excess of 10 g's positive and 9 negative
in a Sukoi. As you can imagine those of us who put up a resistance to such
statements caught holy hell from his zoomness for attacking him. One respondent
seemed to be quite knowledgeable the the effects of G forces on the human body.
After a heated exchange between zoom and that person where zoom said that that
person didn't know what they were talking about.

That person posted who they were and where they worked.Turns out she was a
Medical Dr and Engineer at some centrifuge facility and did G studies every day.
zoom as usual tucked tail and ran.Just like jaun is doing or will do shortly. It
is now known as "the Battle of the Sukoi G's" and is worth a combat ribbon for
the participants.

The same when zoom posted under a different name and swore it wasn't him.An
English Major who taught at a Major University promptly showed that zoom was the
author of the posts by comparing the posts and the distinctive writing style of
zoom. Now known as the "Battle of the ellipses"

Then the time zoom didn't know who was countering him on legal matters saying
that this guy didn't know what he was talking about. I bet zoom rues the day he
threatened that poster with a lawsuit then found out he just threatened a
lawyer. That was zooms introduction to Tony Pucillo .I bet zoom has regretted
telling Tony "he's in violation of law and my attorney has been notified".

There are other instances but the lesson here is to be truthful about who you
are and don't pick fights with someone who may be smarter then you :-) jaun and
zoom are so alike it's bizarre. This time jaun once again proved that he lacks
credibility and is also incompetent on a computeras well. Life can be good :-)

Chuck S RAH 14-1 ret

"credibility it was always about credibility" chuck s

Chuck;

Isn't it amazing that a computer expert can't find me in a government
data base. Seems everyone else didn't have a problem finding me ,that
is if it is me. You know that there is always the possibility that
another Frank M.Hitlaw earned a Private pilot ,A&P and Sr parachute
riggers ratings on exactly the same days as I said I got them. In juan
and zzzoom speak that would be a logical conclusion because it fits
their warped reality.

Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
In article . com, BobR says...

Standard Zoom and Jaun technique...when the FACTS are presented and
they don't support their lie, either deny the facts, deny they said
that, or change the argument. In this case, its all three. At least
one of Jaun's statements were true...HE COULDN'T FIND Hitlaw in the
database. That fact shouldn't be a surprise for anyone here.

Hats off to those who ARE computer savvy enough to have caught jaun in his own
incompetence. Ya never know who's the person behind the name tag "or" what they
know. Time and time again I've seen the brightest,the smartest the most
experienced never say much on their own behalf or toot their own horn.

As Sister Mary Holy Smoke used to say "an empty can makes the most
noise".However when needed these "real experts" come out and show that the
loudmouth is just that a loudmouth. I love when that happens and kudos to you
all.

Over the years of the zoom wars I've seen this happen a few times.Such as the
time zoom was boasting about pulling in excess of 10 g's positive and 9 negative
in a Sukoi. As you can imagine those of us who put up a resistance to such
statements caught holy hell from his zoomness for attacking him. One respondent
seemed to be quite knowledgeable the the effects of G forces on the human body.
After a heated exchange between zoom and that person where zoom said that that
person didn't know what they were talking about.

That person posted who they were and where they worked.Turns out she was a
Medical Dr and Engineer at some centrifuge facility and did G studies every day.
zoom as usual tucked tail and ran.Just like jaun is doing or will do shortly. It
is now known as "the Battle of the Sukoi G's" and is worth a combat ribbon for
the participants.

The same when zoom posted under a different name and swore it wasn't him.An
English Major who taught at a Major University promptly showed that zoom was the
author of the posts by comparing the posts and the distinctive writing style of
zoom. Now known as the "Battle of the ellipses"

Then the time zoom didn't know who was countering him on legal matters saying
that this guy didn't know what he was talking about. I bet zoom rues the day he
threatened that poster with a lawsuit then found out he just threatened a
lawyer. That was zooms introduction to Tony Pucillo .I bet zoom has regretted
telling Tony "he's in violation of law and my attorney has been notified".

There are other instances but the lesson here is to be truthful about who you
are and don't pick fights with someone who may be smarter then you :-) jaun and
zoom are so alike it's bizarre. This time jaun once again proved that he lacks
credibility and is also incompetent on a computeras well. Life can be good :-)

Chuck S RAH 14-1 ret

"credibility it was always about credibility" chuck s

Chuck;

Isn't it amazing that a computer expert can't find me in a government
data base. Seems everyone else didn't have a problem finding me ,that
is if it is me. You know that there is always the possibility that
another Frank M.Hitlaw earned a Private pilot ,A&P and Sr parachute
riggers ratings on exactly the same days as I said I got them. In juan
and zzzoom speak that would be a logical conclusion because it fits
their warped reality.

Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring

wrote:
ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
In article . com, BobR says...

Standard Zoom and Jaun technique...when the FACTS are presented and
they don't support their lie, either deny the facts, deny they said
that, or change the argument. In this case, its all three. At least
one of Jaun's statements were true...HE COULDN'T FIND Hitlaw in the
database. That fact shouldn't be a surprise for anyone here.

Hats off to those who ARE computer savvy enough to have caught jaun in his own
incompetence. Ya never know who's the person behind the name tag "or" what they
know. Time and time again I've seen the brightest,the smartest the most
experienced never say much on their own behalf or toot their own horn.

As Sister Mary Holy Smoke used to say "an empty can makes the most
noise".However when needed these "real experts" come out and show that the
loudmouth is just that a loudmouth. I love when that happens and kudos to you
all.

Over the years of the zoom wars I've seen this happen a few times.Such as the
time zoom was boasting about pulling in excess of 10 g's positive and 9 negative
in a Sukoi. As you can imagine those of us who put up a resistance to such
statements caught holy hell from his zoomness for attacking him. One respondent
seemed to be quite knowledgeable the the effects of G forces on the human body.
After a heated exchange between zoom and that person where zoom said that that
person didn't know what they were talking about.

That person posted who they were and where they worked.Turns out she was a
Medical Dr and Engineer at some centrifuge facility and did G studies every day.
zoom as usual tucked tail and ran.Just like jaun is doing or will do shortly. It
is now known as "the Battle of the Sukoi G's" and is worth a combat ribbon for
the participants.

The same when zoom posted under a different name and swore it wasn't him.An
English Major who taught at a Major University promptly showed that zoom was the
author of the posts by comparing the posts and the distinctive writing style of
zoom. Now known as the "Battle of the ellipses"

Then the time zoom didn't know who was countering him on legal matters saying
that this guy didn't know what he was talking about. I bet zoom rues the day he
threatened that poster with a lawsuit then found out he just threatened a
lawyer. That was zooms introduction to Tony Pucillo .I bet zoom has regretted
telling Tony "he's in violation of law and my attorney has been notified".

There are other instances but the lesson here is to be truthful about who you
are and don't pick fights with someone who may be smarter then you :-) jaun and
zoom are so alike it's bizarre. This time jaun once again proved that he lacks
credibility and is also incompetent on a computeras well. Life can be good :-)

Chuck S RAH 14-1 ret

"credibility it was always about credibility" chuck s

Chuck;

Isn't it amazing that a computer expert can't find me in a government
data base. Seems everyone else didn't have a problem finding me ,that
is if it is me. You know that there is always the possibility that
another Frank M.Hitlaw earned a Private pilot ,A&P and Sr parachute
riggers ratings on exactly the same days as I said I got them. In juan
and zzzoom speak that would be a logical conclusion because it fits
their warped reality.

Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring

I suspect he did find it and figured that if he claimed he couldn't no
one would check. Seeing how he likes to lie and has displayed
considerable stupidity that would fit.

Harry K

....saying he's displayed "considerable stupidity" ranks right up there,
in studies done by the Department of Measureable Understatement, with
"boy, that sure was some loud noise at Cape Canaveral the other day..."


Harry K wrote:
wrote:
ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
In article . com, BobR says...

Standard Zoom and Jaun technique...when the FACTS are presented and
they don't support their lie, either deny the facts, deny they said
that, or change the argument. In this case, its all three. At least
one of Jaun's statements were true...HE COULDN'T FIND Hitlaw in the
database. That fact shouldn't be a surprise for anyone here.

Hats off to those who ARE computer savvy enough to have caught jaun in his own
incompetence. Ya never know who's the person behind the name tag "or" what they
know. Time and time again I've seen the brightest,the smartest the most
experienced never say much on their own behalf or toot their own horn.

As Sister Mary Holy Smoke used to say "an empty can makes the most
noise".However when needed these "real experts" come out and show that the
loudmouth is just that a loudmouth. I love when that happens and kudos to you
all.

Over the years of the zoom wars I've seen this happen a few times.Such as the
time zoom was boasting about pulling in excess of 10 g's positive and 9 negative
in a Sukoi. As you can imagine those of us who put up a resistance to such
statements caught holy hell from his zoomness for attacking him. One respondent
seemed to be quite knowledgeable the the effects of G forces on the human body.
After a heated exchange between zoom and that person where zoom said that that
person didn't know what they were talking about.

That person posted who they were and where they worked.Turns out she was a
Medical Dr and Engineer at some centrifuge facility and did G studies every day.
zoom as usual tucked tail and ran.Just like jaun is doing or will do shortly. It
is now known as "the Battle of the Sukoi G's" and is worth a combat ribbon for
the participants.

The same when zoom posted under a different name and swore it wasn't him.An
English Major who taught at a Major University promptly showed that zoom was the
author of the posts by comparing the posts and the distinctive writing style of
zoom. Now known as the "Battle of the ellipses"

Then the time zoom didn't know who was countering him on legal matters saying
that this guy didn't know what he was talking about. I bet zoom rues the day he
threatened that poster with a lawsuit then found out he just threatened a
lawyer. That was zooms introduction to Tony Pucillo .I bet zoom has regretted
telling Tony "he's in violation of law and my attorney has been notified".

There are other instances but the lesson here is to be truthful about who you
are and don't pick fights with someone who may be smarter then you :-) jaun and
zoom are so alike it's bizarre. This time jaun once again proved that he lacks
credibility and is also incompetent on a computeras well. Life can be good :-)

Chuck S RAH 14-1 ret

"credibility it was always about credibility" chuck s

Chuck;

Isn't it amazing that a computer expert can't find me in a government
data base. Seems everyone else didn't have a problem finding me ,that
is if it is me. You know that there is always the possibility that
another Frank M.Hitlaw earned a Private pilot ,A&P and Sr parachute
riggers ratings on exactly the same days as I said I got them. In juan
and zzzoom speak that would be a logical conclusion because it fits
their warped reality.

Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring

I suspect he did find it and figured that if he claimed he couldn't no
one would check. Seeing how he likes to lie and has displayed
considerable stupidity that would fit.

Harry K

....oldest cliche' in the world, richard: "those who can't do, teach."


I curious - when you do your "computer consulting" is it the same way
you do the BD5 - tell everyone how much you know, and how they should
do stuff, and how wonderful the product is, without ever really doing
it yourself?

In article . com, olympusE1
says...

...oldest cliche' in the world, richard: "those who can't do, teach."


I curious - when you do your "computer consulting" is it the same way
you do the BD5 - tell everyone how much you know, and how they should
do stuff, and how wonderful the product is, without ever really doing
it yourself?


yawn sure got quiet after it was proven that not only is he a liar, he is not
credible and last but not least incompetent. That's a hoot.Next he'll tell us it
wasn't him but another jaun LOL!!!

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

Oh God! You mean there's more than ONE? ****! Blows my whole theory
that lightning never strikes the same place (newsgroup in this case)
twice...

Scott



ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:

In article . com, olympusE1
says...

...oldest cliche' in the world, richard: "those who can't do, teach."



I curious - when you do your "computer consulting" is it the same way
you do the BD5 - tell everyone how much you know, and how they should
do stuff, and how wonderful the product is, without ever really doing
it yourself?


yawn sure got quiet after it was proven that not only is he a liar, he is not
credible and last but not least incompetent. That's a hoot.Next he'll tell us it
wasn't him but another jaun LOL!!!

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret