A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Question to Mxmanic



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old April 14th 07, 12:22 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Question to Mxmanic

Snowbird writes:

Well, in real aviation the most valuable use of simulators is for practising
upsets and other abnormal situations that are not safe or feasible to do in
the real aircraft.


Not everyone uses simulation as practice for real aviation. There are many
possible purposes to which simulation can be put, and just as many different
types of simulators. No simulator simulates every aspect of reality
accurately, but nobody requires a duplicate of reality, only a reproduction of
those aspects of reality that are of interest.

So it would be an extremely useful feature to have in MSFS.


I don't know that it would be "extremely" useful, but it would certainly be a
plus. Then again, if real pilots don't use MSFS for training, would it really
be that important?

Besides, the idea is to avoid wake turbulence, not to fly through it, so the
only real training required is procedural.

In addition, if the feature were in MSFS, it would aid realism to basic
flight training as well i.e. flying a correct 360-degree turn.


Are 360-degree turns common? Why would they encounter wake turbulence?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #22  
Old April 14th 07, 12:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Question to Mxmanic

Little Endian writes:

In the sim it makes no sense to avoid wake turbulence because you will
never know if you succeeded, its an exercise in futility.


Real life is like that, too. You only know when you fail to avoid wake
turbulence, not when you succeed.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #23  
Old April 14th 07, 01:18 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Dudley Henriques[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,546
Default Question to Mxmanic


"ManhattanMan" wrote in message
...
Steve Foley wrote:
"karl gruber" wrote in message
...
Half a bottle of Jack Daniel's


Half full or half empty?


from an engineering standpoint, the bottle wasn't designed
correctly...........


I was JUST about to say this!!! :-))
Dudley Henriques


  #24  
Old April 14th 07, 02:35 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Gary[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 60
Default Question to Mxmanic

On Apr 13, 7:23 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Little Endian writes:
In the sim it makes no sense to avoid wake turbulence because you will
never know if you succeeded, its an exercise in futility.


Real life is like that, too. You only know when you fail to avoid wake
turbulence, not when you succeed.



Couldn't be more wrong. In real life, you most certainly know when
you succeed in avoiding wake turbulence.


  #25  
Old April 14th 07, 02:40 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
george
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 803
Default Question to Mxmanic

On Apr 14, 2:36 am, "Matt Barrow"
wrote:
"karl gruber" wrote in message

...

Half a bottle of Jack Daniel's


Wimp!!

He meant the bottom half.
After he'd drank the top half to get to it :-)


  #26  
Old April 14th 07, 02:43 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Little Endian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17
Default Question to Mxmanic


Real life is like that, too. You only know when you fail to avoid wake
turbulence, not when you succeed.


Incorrect statement.

  #27  
Old April 14th 07, 02:44 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Question to Mxmanic

Gary writes:

Couldn't be more wrong. In real life, you most certainly know when
you succeed in avoiding wake turbulence.


No, you don't. You don't know if you avoided it, or if it simply wasn't there
to begin with.

In any case, avoidance is the only safe procedure. Trying to fly in wake
turbulence isn't a good idea.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #28  
Old April 14th 07, 02:46 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Question to Mxmanic

Little Endian writes:

Incorrect statement.


I'm always surprised by posts that simply say "wrong," but don't explain why.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #29  
Old April 14th 07, 03:05 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
ManhattanMan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 207
Default Question to Mxmanic

Dudley Henriques wrote:
"ManhattanMan" wrote in message
...
Steve Foley wrote:
"karl gruber" wrote in message
...
Half a bottle of Jack Daniel's


Half full or half empty?


from an engineering standpoint, the bottle wasn't designed
correctly...........


I was JUST about to say this!!! :-))
Dudley Henriques


GOTCHA!! d:-))


  #30  
Old April 14th 07, 03:15 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Dudley Henriques[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,546
Default Question to Mxmanic


"ManhattanMan" wrote in message
...
Dudley Henriques wrote:
"ManhattanMan" wrote in message
...
Steve Foley wrote:
"karl gruber" wrote in message
...
Half a bottle of Jack Daniel's


Half full or half empty?

from an engineering standpoint, the bottle wasn't designed
correctly...........


I was JUST about to say this!!! :-))
Dudley Henriques


GOTCHA!! d:-))


The way this one got twisted around down at the Naval Test Pilot School was
as follows;

Procurement Office ; "This bottle is half empty"
Maintainence Office ; " This bottle is half full"
Flight Test Engineering Office :
"Yo Jack....call those idiots over at Procurement and tell them this damn
bottle is twice as big as it has to be "
Dudley Henriques




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I want to ask you the most important question of your life. The question is: Are you saved? It is no gasman Soaring 0 August 26th 05 06:39 PM
Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good Excelsior Home Built 0 April 22nd 05 01:11 AM
Question about Question 4488 [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 3 October 27th 03 01:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.