Bush denies preparing attack against Iran

dapra writes:

AirRaid wrote:


On Jan 26, 6:48 pm, "AirRaid" wrote:

On Jan 26, 6:37 pm, dapra wrote:


AirRaid wrote:

Bush denies preparing attack against Iran

By Edward Luce in Washington

Published: January 26 2007 19:37 | Last updated: January 26 2007 19:37

George W. Bush on Friday sought to deny widespread rumours his
administration was preparing some kind of military action against Iran.So Bush claimed, that war is the last resort against Iraq, while he was

conspiring to provoke a war already in the summer 2002. (Downing Street
Memo)




I fully expect some kind of attack on Iran by the U.S. and/or Israel,
before the end of 2007. no ground invasion though, no way. at most,
massive strategic bombardment to wipe out Iran's nuclear facilicities
and capacity to retailiate. It might even come down to using
mini-nuclear weapons with very very low-yeild nukes to wipe out the
very deep Iranian nuclear centers, unless the better option can come in
time, if the U.S. can get one of their conventional, non-nuclear
30,000 lbs class Massive Ordnance Penetrators such as 'Big BLU' ready
in
time.http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...ions/dshtw.htm


I agree, Bush may do just that you described. He proved to be an
aggressor, justified or NOT.

The leopard will not change his spots.

Bush is an international aggressor, a builder of an international
plutocracy, and the US cleptocracy.

I agree too, as the elections come close maybe further hardline action
will draw voters to the existing administration camp. An attack with
mini-nukes against nuclear sites, although not necessary IMO could
easily be fudged by the media since radiation could be explained by
the bombed facilities. Not that letting radiation out is a sane policy
under any circumstances now that anyone with an IQ in the high 2
digits realizes how pervasive effects of events in one part of the
world are.
--
BOFH excuse #232:

Ionization from the air-conditioning