If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#171
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
On 17 Mar, 23:45, Nyal Williams wrote:
Jim White had it right, way back several weeks ago. *What makes it work is MAGIC. * I'm convinced that helicopters don'tactually fly: they just induce hallucinations in people so they think flying is occuring. Some stroboscopic effect, probably. Ian |
#172
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
The Real Doctor wrote:
On 18 Mar, 01:38, Darryl Ramm wrote: As I explained, Gravity provides the energy... Then you will need to explain how gravity provides the energy when the glider is climbing. Just curious, but are you being pedantic? |
#173
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
On Mar 18, 3:34*pm, Jim Logajan wrote:
The Real Doctor wrote: On 18 Mar, 01:38, Darryl Ramm wrote: As I explained, Gravity provides the energy... Then you will need to explain how gravity provides the energy when the glider is climbing. Just curious, but are you being pedantic? Just an extreme case of rasterbation. If he keeps it up he will go blind. Darryl. |
#174
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
Ian, "The Real Doctor" Out of curiosity, what exactly do you have a
doctorate in? Aside from that.... In order to seek clarity in all of these discussions I suspect that we have a mis-understanding because we are trying to discuss these using two different reference frames. If that's the case, then that would explain a lot. I hope that we are all in agreement about the three forces acting on a glider. For simplicity they are lift(L), drag(D) and weight(W=mg). As has been corrected by Darryl, I agree that it is correct that lift, by definition, is perpendicular to the airflow. However, for a glider in steady state gliding flight, airflow and direction of motion are parallel. Any body have any problems so far? I'm hoping this will get me out of the hen house... If we align the axis system such that weight is vertical and the descent angle is theta. The equilibrium equations a Vert. Axis 0 = L*cos(theta) + D*sin(theta) - W Horz. Axis 0 = L*sin(theta) - D*cos(theta) I'm guessing this is the source of the Lift providing the horizontal motion argument. Clearly there is no gravity term in that component. But the motion isn't strictly horizontal or vertical with these equations. It is both, and therefore I would advocate a simplified set where the direction of motion is the basis for the axis system. Therefore.... If the axis system is aligned along the lift vector the equations simplify to: (For the sliding block this tends to be the convention that most books I own present) Replace L with N for Normal. Lift Axis 0 = L - W*cos(theta) Drag Axis 0 = D - W*sin(theta) Any objections so far? I sure hope not. I can't imagine how.... The nice thing about convention 2 is that the lift and drag vectors are isolated variables in the equation, and the weight is already known so it's easy to solve the other values. L = W*cos(theta) and D=W*sin(theta) I can even rearrange the equations in set 1 and get the same relationships. So, what in the world am I missing when I say Lift = Weight * cos (glide angle)? Ian, you are the real doctor. I'll confess my ignorance. I don't want to guess, cause I just don't know what answer you're looking for, but what did I forget? The other advantage of using convention 2 is in describing the motion of the system. The object is constrained to the plane, and therefore you can get rid of the "vertical" axis in this example and look at the equation with one dimension. Because the lift force or normal force constrains the object to the plane, you'll have no accelerations or displacements in this direction, for a steady state example. In this case that would be it's glide path. The only equation left is D = W*sin (theta) So again I argue, Lift, because it is perpendicular to the direction of motion, can not provide the motive force! The motive force is governed by a balance between gravity, drag, and the glide angle. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying lift isn't important. It is very important to making the glider stay on a glide path. Maybe this is just a chicken before the egg argument. I can see the circularity of the discussion. Why do those chickens keep coming up.... This would be a whole lot easier to explain with pictures. So I'll cite a reference...If anybody has a copy of the BGA Manual: "Gliding: Theory of Flight", please reference the discussion of forces on flight in Chapter 4. The book goes through a very good explanation of how gravity provides the motive force for gliding. It's an excellent book and I highly recommend it. If only it had a discussion of forces on tow.... -Kevin PS I think we need some good flying weather so that we all get out of the house and away from the computer.... |
#175
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
A glider in steady free flight is always descending through the air in
which it is flying. If you can fly in air that is going up as fast or faster than the sink rate of the glider, then you can gain potential height energy. Isn't that what soaring flight is all about? Derek Copeland (Qualified gliding instructor with Gold C and 3 Diamonds BTW) At 22:07 18 March 2009, The Real Doctor wrote: On 17 Mar, 19:04, Darryl Ramm wrote: Say what? Gravitational potential energy *increases* not decreases as the glider climbs. Sorry, typo. And that "store" is the transfer mechanism that allows the glider to glide. No it's not. The gravity force is necessary, but it's perfectly possible to soar for extended periods and distances without adding to or drawing from the potential energy store. It happens any time we fly level - along a wavebar, running a ridge, following a cloud street. There is no other mechanism. With no gravity, even with an atmosphere (which would be difficult to arrange), your glider could not glide. You miss, as so many people do, the point. Because the force of gravity is necessary for a glider to work, people assume that gravity somehow "powers" the flight. Which it does not. Guy's this has wandered into junior-high school level physics. No, it has wandered into junior high school level misconceptions about physics! Here's another one for you. Does a glider turn (normally) by (a) rolling (b) pitching (c) yawing or (d) other? Ian |
#176
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
Having read all 170 posts in this thread I am still happily ignorant of the
theory of flight! Jim |
#177
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
On 18 Mar, 22:34, Jim Logajan wrote:
The Real Doctor wrote: On 18 Mar, 01:38, Darryl Ramm wrote: As I explained, Gravity provides the energy... Then you will need to explain how gravity provides the energy when the glider is climbing. Just curious, but are you being pedantic? No, I'm being serious in a usenet-is-not-reallife sort of way. I introduced this, you see, as a common misconception in the gliding world. Lots of people think that gliders are "powered by gravity", and they aren't! Ian |
#178
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
On 18 Mar, 22:59, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Mar 18, 3:34*pm, Jim Logajan wrote: The Real Doctor wrote: On 18 Mar, 01:38, Darryl Ramm wrote: As I explained, Gravity provides the energy... Then you will need to explain how gravity provides the energy when the glider is climbing. Just curious, but are you being pedantic? Just an extreme case of rasterbation. If he keeps it up he will go blind. Go on then. Explain how "gravity provides the energy" when a glider is climbing ... Ian |
#179
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
On 19 Mar, 00:03, KevinFinke wrote:
Ian, "The Real Doctor" *Out of curiosity, what exactly do you have a doctorate in? Numerical solution of non-linear diffusion problems.Which is actually a lot more interesting than it sounds. I can even rearrange the equations in set 1 and get the same relationships. So, what in the world am I missing when I say Lift = Weight * cos (glide angle)? *Smacks head* Sorry, it was late. I misread, and thought you'd done the old W = L cos (theta) mistake (W, of course, = L cos(theta) + D sin(theta). My apologies. Ian |
#180
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
On 19 Mar, 07:45, Jim White wrote:
Having read all 170 posts in this thread I am still happily ignorant of the theory of flight! Aircraft stay up because they're afraid of the ground. That said, you might find it interesting to get hold of the TV programme and video which the Open University made on gliding mathematics some years ago. The course in question, "MST207 Applied Mathematics" is defunct, but a fair number of copies of the AV material lurk around gliding clubs. Ian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Seeking towplanes for Region 9 | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | May 17th 06 12:03 AM |
US:Restricted Towplanes | Judy Ruprecht | Soaring | 8 | November 5th 04 11:27 PM |
Standard Nationals Need Towplanes | C AnthMin | Soaring | 5 | July 14th 04 12:46 AM |
Take-upReels on Towplanes | Nyal Williams | Soaring | 9 | April 21st 04 12:39 AM |
Helicopters and Towplanes | Burt Compton | Soaring | 6 | September 11th 03 05:21 PM |