A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Parasitic drag question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old March 13th 04, 01:26 PM
d b
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, maybe a bit more than a nit. It takes about 400 hours to smooth
a 100 sq ft glider wing to the tolerances needed.

In article , "Morgans"
wrote:

"d b" wrote in message
hlink.net...
paint adds zilch, nada, nothing. Smooth means a lot, but you
can't get smooth by painting. It takes sanding of the paint (or gel coat)
until the divits and lumps do not exceed .003 +_ inches in a 2 inch arc.
For most power type planes, lumps and bumps don't mean anything
behind about 20 or 30 percent chord in any case.


Agreed. Given that most people sand and fill when they paint, I was
thinking the painting process was going to make it smoother, as you suggest.

Any other nits to pick?

  #12  
Old March 13th 04, 11:21 PM
Sailor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Hi Group, lost my identity somehow when the computer locked up so to reply
to all the good imput you have made I have had to make a new one.
The manufactireres and my plane is almost identical with a ground adjustable
prop (Bolly 3 blade) Same fire wall forward kit..identical. Both climb and
top speed are down so suspect the pitch is not the answer, I may be 10kg
heavier though.
Interesting to hear the concensus that the paint will make very little
diference so will have to put my faith in the four last bits of fairing
(front wheel pant and three leg fairings around 1 1/4inch tube) I like the
coment "Manufacturers ALWAYS achieve better performance than their
customers. It's a fundamental law of aerodynamics". Thanks for that and all
the other comments. Derek.




"Derek Anderson" wrote in message
...
We are currently test flying an all fiber-glass experimental plane in an
unpainted state and wondered if any of you have done the same and
experienced as much as a 10% increase in air speed and improved climb rate
after painting your planes.
I know most of you are happy to wait until your pride and joy is painted

but
we opted to test fly in the raw. The manufacturer who has a similar plane

is
achieving around 10 knots better speed for the same revolutions, at 4,600
rpm on a Subaru conversion with a 2:1 reduction he gets 100 knots and we

are
only just getting 90. The only difference in configuration is the addition
of front wheel fairing and three leg fairings plus nice shiny paint. Our
climb rate is also very low compared to predictions. It will be several
months before it is painted and back in the air so am asking the group.
Replies appreciated. Derek.







 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question for Squirrel the Lurker jls Home Built 0 January 30th 04 02:41 PM
Poly Dope Question Michael Home Built 3 January 29th 04 07:10 AM
Tailplane question Lou Parker Home Built 6 January 25th 04 09:13 PM
Zenith Zodiac XL question Mick Home Built 4 January 14th 04 05:47 PM
Tecumseh Engine Mounting Question jlauer Home Built 7 November 16th 03 01:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.