If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Well, maybe a bit more than a nit. It takes about 400 hours to smooth
a 100 sq ft glider wing to the tolerances needed. In article , "Morgans" wrote: "d b" wrote in message hlink.net... paint adds zilch, nada, nothing. Smooth means a lot, but you can't get smooth by painting. It takes sanding of the paint (or gel coat) until the divits and lumps do not exceed .003 +_ inches in a 2 inch arc. For most power type planes, lumps and bumps don't mean anything behind about 20 or 30 percent chord in any case. Agreed. Given that most people sand and fill when they paint, I was thinking the painting process was going to make it smoother, as you suggest. Any other nits to pick? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Group, lost my identity somehow when the computer locked up so to reply to all the good imput you have made I have had to make a new one. The manufactireres and my plane is almost identical with a ground adjustable prop (Bolly 3 blade) Same fire wall forward kit..identical. Both climb and top speed are down so suspect the pitch is not the answer, I may be 10kg heavier though. Interesting to hear the concensus that the paint will make very little diference so will have to put my faith in the four last bits of fairing (front wheel pant and three leg fairings around 1 1/4inch tube) I like the coment "Manufacturers ALWAYS achieve better performance than their customers. It's a fundamental law of aerodynamics". Thanks for that and all the other comments. Derek. "Derek Anderson" wrote in message ... We are currently test flying an all fiber-glass experimental plane in an unpainted state and wondered if any of you have done the same and experienced as much as a 10% increase in air speed and improved climb rate after painting your planes. I know most of you are happy to wait until your pride and joy is painted but we opted to test fly in the raw. The manufacturer who has a similar plane is achieving around 10 knots better speed for the same revolutions, at 4,600 rpm on a Subaru conversion with a 2:1 reduction he gets 100 knots and we are only just getting 90. The only difference in configuration is the addition of front wheel fairing and three leg fairings plus nice shiny paint. Our climb rate is also very low compared to predictions. It will be several months before it is painted and back in the air so am asking the group. Replies appreciated. Derek. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question for Squirrel the Lurker | jls | Home Built | 0 | January 30th 04 02:41 PM |
Poly Dope Question | Michael | Home Built | 3 | January 29th 04 07:10 AM |
Tailplane question | Lou Parker | Home Built | 6 | January 25th 04 09:13 PM |
Zenith Zodiac XL question | Mick | Home Built | 4 | January 14th 04 05:47 PM |
Tecumseh Engine Mounting Question | jlauer | Home Built | 7 | November 16th 03 01:51 AM |