A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old September 24th 10, 09:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 815
Default Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion

On Sep 24, 4:16*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 2:18*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 1:40*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 23, 12:30*pm, wrote:


In other words, there is nothing in production that makes even the 120
miles you claim.


Jim Pennino


300 ÷ 120 = 2.5


---
Mark


So now you are claiming that there is a pure electric car in production
that gets 300 miles to a charge?


Where is it?


--
Jim Pennino


Oh, I think you may find it about 8 posts
back above this one, where I told you the first
time. However, they frequently exceed that
distance.


---
Mark


I'm not going back through all your broken links.


Put up or shut up.


--
Jim Pennino


????? *It isn't a link. I gave you the manufacturer's
name and model. It goes 300 miles on a charge.
It costs less than my truck did.


If you actually had something it would have been easier for you to just
repost the make and model instead of hand waving about it.

Put up or shut up.

--
Jim Pennino



Well...Jim...it does get tiring having to repeat myself
over and over and over, when you've just not read what
I've already told you. Seems this is a reoccuring pattern.
I mean, I even counted for you to pinpoint it.

I don't know what arm-waving is. I'm a distance
swimmer, so, technically you're kinda right.

---
Mark
  #22  
Old September 24th 10, 09:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 815
Default Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion

On Sep 24, 4:15*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 2:37*pm, Jim Logajan wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 1:40*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 23, 12:30*pm, wrote:


In other words, there is nothing in production that makes even the
120 miles you claim.


Jim Pennino


300 ÷ 120 = 2.5


---
Mark


So now you are claiming that there is a pure electric car in
production that gets 300 miles to a charge?


Where is it?


--
Jim Pennino


Oh, I think you may find it about 8 posts
back above this one, where I told you the first
time. However, they frequently exceed that
distance.


The Tesla Roadster only claims 245 miles/charge.
The Tesla Model S claims 300 miles/charge, but Tesla says it wont be
available till 2012.


Oh yeah - the Tesla Roadster has a list price of $109,000.
The Tesla Model S is listed at $56,500.
There is a $7500 tax incentive that drops those prices a little.


You can buy a pretty nice plane for $109k.


At this juncture we're discussing whether the technology
exists, and if it's going mainstream.


No, where are discussing whether or not the technology is on the market
with a side discussion of how affordable it is if it is on the market.


I'm not smart enough to do that. I'll have to restrict myself
to one topic, establish reality, then pick another. Your main
refute thus far has been that it is technologically impossible.
You've said it over and over.

Is this still your stance on an electric car? That they won't
exceed 40 miles on a charge, and never will, therefore we'll
never see them on the roads?

In 1969 I paid $75.00 for a calculator. It had 7 functions...
[ On, Off, Add, Subtract, Multiply, Divide, and Clear ]


Complex chips were infant technology in 1969.


Yes, that's the way I remember it.

Batteries and electric motors are mature technologies.


So are wheels. They predate the pyramids. But I
wouldn't put one of their wheels on my truck.

All the improvements in both in the last few decades have been in the area
of expensive materials engineering, i.e. rare earth elements.


Yes, you're absolutely correct. I believe the greater minds
today are thinking beyond Al-air (aluminum air) or Li-air
(lithium air) batteries. The military uses Al-batteries now,
but then, our national debt is 13 trillion dollars, so what
does that tell you.

Smart money is betting on carbon nano-engineering.
Does Walmart carry these today on isle 12? No. We're
basically talking about a NEW INVENTION here. Same
thing with Li-air, new invention. Are these mature
technologies? Of course not. Not even close. The anology
to a 1969 calculator is...apples to apples.

--
Jim Pennino



  #23  
Old September 24th 10, 10:49 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion

Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 4:16Â*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 2:18Â*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 1:40Â*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 23, 12:30Â*pm, wrote:


In other words, there is nothing in production that makes even the 120
miles you claim.


Jim Pennino


300 ÷ 120 = 2.5


---
Mark


So now you are claiming that there is a pure electric car in production
that gets 300 miles to a charge?


Where is it?


--
Jim Pennino


Oh, I think you may find it about 8 posts
back above this one, where I told you the first
time. However, they frequently exceed that
distance.


---
Mark


I'm not going back through all your broken links.


Put up or shut up.


--
Jim Pennino


????? Â*It isn't a link. I gave you the manufacturer's
name and model. It goes 300 miles on a charge.
It costs less than my truck did.


If you actually had something it would have been easier for you to just
repost the make and model instead of hand waving about it.

Put up or shut up.

--
Jim Pennino



Well...Jim...it does get tiring having to repeat myself
over and over and over, when you've just not read what
I've already told you. Seems this is a reoccuring pattern.
I mean, I even counted for you to pinpoint it.

I don't know what arm-waving is. I'm a distance
swimmer, so, technically you're kinda right.


Can't even find it yourself, can you?


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #24  
Old September 24th 10, 11:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion

Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 4:15Â*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 2:37Â*pm, Jim Logajan wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 1:40Â*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 23, 12:30Â*pm, wrote:


In other words, there is nothing in production that makes even the
120 miles you claim.


Jim Pennino


300 ÷ 120 = 2.5


---
Mark


So now you are claiming that there is a pure electric car in
production that gets 300 miles to a charge?


Where is it?


--
Jim Pennino


Oh, I think you may find it about 8 posts
back above this one, where I told you the first
time. However, they frequently exceed that
distance.


The Tesla Roadster only claims 245 miles/charge.
The Tesla Model S claims 300 miles/charge, but Tesla says it wont be
available till 2012.


Oh yeah - the Tesla Roadster has a list price of $109,000.
The Tesla Model S is listed at $56,500.
There is a $7500 tax incentive that drops those prices a little.


You can buy a pretty nice plane for $109k.


At this juncture we're discussing whether the technology
exists, and if it's going mainstream.


No, where are discussing whether or not the technology is on the market
with a side discussion of how affordable it is if it is on the market.


I'm not smart enough to do that. I'll have to restrict myself
to one topic, establish reality, then pick another. Your main
refute thus far has been that it is technologically impossible.
You've said it over and over.


Learn to read.

What I've said was technologically impossible for the foreseeable future
is any kind of portable, electric storage device to come anywhere near the
energy density of gasoline/diesel fuel.

Is this still your stance on an electric car? That they won't
exceed 40 miles on a charge, and never will, therefore we'll
never see them on the roads?


Learn to read.

What I've said was I don't see any production, pure electric cars with
a one charge range of greater than 40 miles.

Since saying that I realize the Tesla gets around 200 miles on a charge,
so there is one.

One.

What I also said was that the price of all the pure electric cars was too
high for anyone other than a rich enviro-whinner to buy one.

The price of the Tesla is over $100,000, about what a new LSA costs.

You have said such a price level is unatenable for the average person
to buy an airplane.

If that is too much to pay for a new airplane, it also too much to pay for
a new car.

QED.

snip more babble

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #25  
Old September 24th 10, 11:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 815
Default Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion

On Sep 24, 5:49*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 4:16*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 2:18*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 1:40*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 23, 12:30*pm, wrote:


In other words, there is nothing in production that makes even the 120
miles you claim.


Jim Pennino


300 ÷ 120 = 2.5


---
Mark


So now you are claiming that there is a pure electric car in production
that gets 300 miles to a charge?


Where is it?


--
Jim Pennino


Oh, I think you may find it about 8 posts
back above this one, where I told you the first
time. However, they frequently exceed that
distance.


---
Mark


I'm not going back through all your broken links.


Put up or shut up.


--
Jim Pennino


????? *It isn't a link. I gave you the manufacturer's
name and model. It goes 300 miles on a charge.
It costs less than my truck did.


If you actually had something it would have been easier for you to just
repost the make and model instead of hand waving about it.


Put up or shut up.


--
Jim Pennino


Well...Jim...it does get tiring having to repeat myself
over and over and over, when you've just not read what
I've already told you. Seems this is a reoccuring pattern.
I mean, I even counted for you to pinpoint it.


I don't know what arm-waving is. I'm a distance
swimmer, so, technically you're kinda right.


Can't even find it yourself, can you?

--
Jim Pennino


Huh? Now Mr.Logajan has also posted the same
info in this thread. Now 2 of us have mentioned this
300 mile/charge electric car. I don't understand.
It's all up in this thread now.

---
Mark
  #26  
Old September 24th 10, 11:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion

Mark wrote:

Huh? Now Mr.Logajan has also posted the same
info in this thread. Now 2 of us have mentioned this
300 mile/charge electric car. I don't understand.


You don't understand that the Tesla doesn't claim 300 mile/charge?


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #27  
Old September 24th 10, 11:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 815
Default Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion

On Sep 24, 6:21*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
Huh? *Now Mr.Logajan has also posted the same
info in this thread. *Now 2 of us have mentioned this
300 mile/charge electric car. *I don't understand.


You don't understand that the Tesla doesn't claim 300 mile/charge?

--
Jim Pennino


Tesla claims beyond 300 miles on one charge.

---
Mark

  #28  
Old September 25th 10, 12:00 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 815
Default Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion

On Sep 24, 6:52*pm, Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 6:21*pm, wrote:

Mark wrote:
Huh? *Now Mr.Logajan has also posted the same
info in this thread. *Now 2 of us have mentioned this
300 mile/charge electric car. *I don't understand.


You don't understand that the Tesla doesn't claim 300 mile/charge?


--
Jim Pennino


Tesla claims beyond 300 miles on one charge.

---
Mark


They're also having trouble keeping up with demand.

My last count was in excess of 1500 already sold,
with deposit in escrow.

---
Mark
  #29  
Old September 25th 10, 12:06 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ari Silverstein
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 190
Default Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion

On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:39:39 -0700 (PDT), Mark wrote:

I'm a distance
swimmer,


Another Mark(ie) accomplishment! On the list it goes!
--
A fireside chat not with Ari!
http://tr.im/holj
Motto: Live To Spooge It!
  #30  
Old September 25th 10, 12:07 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion

Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 6:21Â*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
Huh? Â*Now Mr.Logajan has also posted the same
info in this thread. Â*Now 2 of us have mentioned this
300 mile/charge electric car. Â*I don't understand.


You don't understand that the Tesla doesn't claim 300 mile/charge?

--
Jim Pennino


Tesla claims beyond 300 miles on one charge.

---
Mark


Lier.

Tesla claims 245 miles for the Roadster and 300 miles for the Model S,
which is in development and doesn't yet exist.

http://www.teslamotors.com/models


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion Mark Piloting 81 September 22nd 10 05:40 PM
IFR GPS replace DME / ADF? [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 21 May 15th 06 03:13 PM
H2 Combustion-Booster Claimed [email protected] Home Built 44 October 12th 05 04:14 AM
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? Guy Alcala Military Aviation 265 March 7th 04 09:28 AM
high-speed camera view of a piston intake, combustion, exhaust R.Hubbell General Aviation 0 February 20th 04 03:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.