If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
How do weather services get sky conditions above the surface?
Rocky Stevens wrote:
On Jul 23, 10:05 am, "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: wrote: On Jul 23, 9:37 am, Mxsmanic wrote: It's easy enough to establish measurement stations on the surface to measure wind, temperature, visibility, etc., but what is the normal way for meteorologists to measure these things aloft? Do they depend on PIREPs, or expendable/recoverable probes and balloons, or satellites, or what? This is one of your poorest troll attempts, Anthony, you are a disappointment. Please try to do better. Do you folks that continue to respond to Mxsmanic, Bertie, Maxwell, and the other trolls realize that if you had simply ignored them this would still be a useful forum? It would also be a useful forum if people actually answered the questions posed, regardless of *who* is asking it. The OP's question is perefectly valid, and x number of years from now when somebody Google's for the answer and gets this thread, all they will see for an answer are insults. There is nothing more frustrating than Googling for an anwer to something only to find the response was "why don't you Google for it". If you have the time to post such a response, you have the time to answer the question. You must be new here. Somebody will answer Anthony's question and then he will tell them they are wrong and say he has studied the issue in depth and that just because the person that answered the question is a pilot does not mean that they know anything about weather or how the information is collected. And to top it all off the fact that I have posted the above in no way lowers the chances of Anthony doing exactly what I've said he would do. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
How do weather services get sky conditions above the surface?
On Jul 23, 9:20*am, Gig 601Xl Builder
wrote: Rocky Stevens wrote: On Jul 23, 10:05 am, "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: wrote: On Jul 23, 9:37 am, Mxsmanic wrote: It's easy enough to establish measurement stations on the surface to measure wind, temperature, visibility, etc., but what is the normal way for meteorologists to measure these things aloft? Do they depend on PIREPs, or expendable/recoverable probes and balloons, or satellites, or what? This is one of your poorest troll attempts, Anthony, you are a disappointment. Please try to do better. Do you folks that continue to respond to Mxsmanic, Bertie, Maxwell, and the other trolls realize that if you had simply ignored them this would still be a useful forum? It would also be a useful forum if people actually answered the questions posed, regardless of *who* is asking it. The OP's question is perefectly valid, and x number of years from now when somebody Google's for the answer and gets this thread, all they will see for an answer are insults. There is nothing more frustrating than Googling for an anwer to something only to find the response was "why don't you Google for it". If you have the time to post such a response, you have the time to answer the question. You must be new here. Somebody will answer Anthony's question and then he will tell them they are wrong and say he has studied the issue in depth and that just because the person that answered the question is a pilot does not mean that they know anything about weather or how the information is collected. And to top it all off the fact that I have posted the above in no way lowers the chances of Anthony doing exactly what I've said he would do. oh god shut up. I've been frankly answering his questions for a while now and I've yet to see him respond to me in that manner, or to other people in that manner either. If it bothers you so much why don't you just not read this place anymore? There are tons of people that post here that I don't like. I cope with it by *gasp* ignoring them. Its not as hard as it sounds. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
How do weather services get sky conditions above the surface?
buttman wrote in
: On Jul 23, 9:20*am, Gig 601Xl Builder wrote: Rocky Stevens wrote: On Jul 23, 10:05 am, "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: wrote: On Jul 23, 9:37 am, Mxsmanic wrote: It's easy enough to establish measurement stations on the surface to measure wind, temperature, visibility, etc., but what is the normal way for meteorologists to measure these things aloft? Do they depend on PIREPs, or expendable/recoverable probes and balloons, or satellites, or what? This is one of your poorest troll attempts, Anthony, you are a disappointment. Please try to do better. Do you folks that continue to respond to Mxsmanic, Bertie, Maxwell, an d the other trolls realize that if you had simply ignored them this would st ill be a useful forum? It would also be a useful forum if people actually answered the questions posed, regardless of *who* is asking it. The OP's question is perefectly valid, and x number of years from now when somebody Google's for the answer and gets this thread, all they will see for an answer are insults. There is nothing more frustrating than Googling for an anwer to something only to find the response was "why don't you Google for it". If you have the time to post such a response, you have the time to answer the question. You must be new here. Somebody will answer Anthony's question and then he will tell them they are wrong and say he has studied the issue in depth and that just because the person that answered the question is a pilot does not mean that they know anything about weather or how the information is collected. And to top it all off the fact that I have posted the above in no way lowers the chances of Anthony doing exactly what I've said he would do. oh god shut up. I've been frankly answering his questions for a while now and I've yet to see him respond to me in that manner, or to other people in that manner either. If it bothers you so much why don't you just not read this place anymore? There are tons of people that post here that I don't like. I cope with it by *gasp* ignoring them. Its not as hard as it sounds. Yeah, right. I believe you. Millions wouldn't but I do. Bertie |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
How do weather services get sky conditions above the surface?
"Rocky Stevens" wrote It would also be a useful forum if people actually answered the questions posed, regardless of *who* is asking it. The OP's question is perefectly valid, and x number of years from now when somebody Google's for the answer and gets this thread, all they will see for an answer are insults. There is nothing more frustrating than Googling for an anwer to something only to find the response was "why don't you Google for it". If you have the time to post such a response, you have the time to answer the question. You must not have kids, or if you do, they are brats. All kids occasionally need to be ignored when they exibit undesirable behavior, and rewarded for correct behavior. That is MX. He never exibits desireable behavior, when the big picture has been taken into account. What he has done is drive off posters by the droves. I still do not understand how anyone with a brain can think that his presence here is desireable, or why they would answer any post of his for any reason. -- Jim in NC |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
How do weather services get sky conditions above the surface?
"Morgans" wrote in
: "Rocky Stevens" wrote It would also be a useful forum if people actually answered the questions posed, regardless of *who* is asking it. The OP's question is perefectly valid, and x number of years from now when somebody Google's for the answer and gets this thread, all they will see for an answer are insults. There is nothing more frustrating than Googling for an anwer to something only to find the response was "why don't you Google for it". If you have the time to post such a response, you have the time to answer the question. You must not have kids, or if you do, they are brats. All kids occasionally need to be ignored when they exibit undesirable behavior, and rewarded for correct behavior. That is MX. He never exibits desireable behavior, when the big picture has been taken into account. What he has done is drive off posters by the droves. I still do not understand how anyone with a brain can think that his presence here is desireable, or why they would answer any post of his for any reason. Lots of things you can't understand, apparently Bertie |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
How do weather services get sky conditions above the surface?
On Jul 23, 10:12*am, "Morgans" wrote:
All kids occasionally need to be ignored when they exibit undesirable behavior, and rewarded for correct behavior. *That is MX. *He never exibits desireable behavior, when the big picture has been taken into account. *What he has done is drive off posters by the droves. I still do not understand how anyone with a brain can think that his presence here is desireable, or why they would answer any post of his for any reason. -- Jim in NC What, praytell, exactly do you find "undesirable" about posting an on- topic question to a newsgroup? The only thing "undesirable" about mxsmanic's postings are the idiots like you who come out of the woodwork to help **** up this place more than it already is. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
How do weather services get sky conditions above the surface?
On Jul 23, 10:20*am, Nomen Nescio wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- From: buttman oh god shut up. I've been frankly answering his questions for a while now and I've yet to see him respond to me in that manner, or to other people in that manner either. Not particularly observant. Are you? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: N/A iQCVAwUBSIeCGJMoscYxZNI5AQGb9QP9E9iMM5eK6hfFKnwOol RJgM8QmVtYj4sk eCfhVJ1ojbiKlDpM13k37Mm3aj1VH3TvAnGsA/GCv6jakJ74EIygbg+z13wFW+KN rYTqLkQKA+Me6veyBQmY53Ns92gvujMKpJSS7ld3U3EklE9sl0 HOH/ncoA9r+dp9 5kYVq3Qou0c= =aBkX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Or maybe I'm just not emotionally fragile enough to cry over the internet about it. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
How do weather services get sky conditions above the surface?
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
How do weather services get sky conditions above the surface?
buttman wrote in
: On Jul 23, 10:12*am, "Morgans" wrote: All kids occasionally need to be ignored when they exibit undesirable behavior, and rewarded for correct behavior. *That is MX. *He never e xibits desireable behavior, when the big picture has been taken into account. *What he has done is drive off posters by the droves. I still do not understand how anyone with a brain can think that his presence here is desireable, or why they would answer any post of his for any reason. -- Jim in NC What, praytell, exactly do you find "undesirable" about posting an on- topic question to a newsgroup? The only thing "undesirable" about mxsmanic's postings are the idiots like you who come out of the woodwork to help **** up this place more than it already is. Great PKB poast there fjukktard Bertie |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
How do weather services get sky conditions above the surface?
buttman wrote:
oh god shut up. I've been frankly answering his questions for a while now and I've yet to see him respond to me in that manner, or to other people in that manner either. If this is an example of your skills when it observational skills then I really am concerned about your ability to act as a CFI. If it bothers you so much why don't you just not read this place anymore? There are tons of people that post here that I don't like. I cope with it by *gasp* ignoring them. Its not as hard as it sounds. So feel free to add me to your ignore list. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aviation Weather Services, AC 00-45F | Bob Gardner | Piloting | 1 | December 20th 07 03:58 AM |
Gliding Weather Services around the world | [email protected] | Soaring | 9 | May 3rd 07 09:42 AM |
AF#2/conditions | Christopher Range | Piloting | 11 | October 26th 06 02:57 AM |
National Weather Services Duties Act of 2005 | Rob | Piloting | 0 | September 7th 05 09:44 PM |
Deicing during heavy weather conditions | William W. Plummer | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | December 24th 04 02:12 PM |