If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven
On Mar 7, 12:07 pm, Larry Dighera wrote:
... Right. Unless it can be demonstrated that such intrusion is reasonable and Constitutionally implemented, it's abuse of power, IMO. Given how hard it would be to make a plane using only intrastate materials, and how easy it is to fly one accross state borders, and especially in view of other rulings on what constitutes 'interstate commerce' there is little doubt that the courts would uphold jurisdiction based on the ICC. That doesn't mean it isn't an abuse of power. I also agree that the 51% policy seems to contain at least an element of protectionism for manufacturers. IIRC before there was a 51% rule, there was a time during which homebuilts were not allowed at all. The original intent would seem to have been to protect homebuilding, regardless of what it has become today. -- FF |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven
"WJRFlyBoy" wrote in message ... On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:34:25 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote: So, if someone builds a BD% on commision for you you think that's safer than a 172? That's what we're talking about. Bertie Don't know, I am going on the testimony of others that say that they are. Of course, the FAA certainly would no tallow unsafe planes in the air. Would they? Yeah, of course. They do it all the time. There are a few BD5s flying ( that was a typo) and they are most definitely quite dangerous. There are a few other contraptions flying around that have some serious issues structuarally, aerodynamically, etc. There's one particular type which is quite popular in my local group that fortunately never seems to get finished. The accident reports are littered with these things and I'm terrified that one of the members is going to ask me to test fly theirs for them. (think 180 mph VW) Bertie Then who'se to say the Skywalker, for instance, certified to the hilt, is safe? Aren't we back to Square One? FAA certification means exactly what?A higher possibility of a safe aircraft? -- I would also add that certification also implies a degree of mainatainability (if that is a real word) as well as fitness for a fairly wide range of applications. Basically, Part 23 is a set of generally accepted engineering standards; and I agree with Bertie that the RV series appear to be quite capable of being certified. Peter (Who's own doodles usually trade away one or more of those standards) |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven
"Acepilot" wrote in message .. . What is a "Pro Built"? I would take it to mean that an experimental "kit" was built by somebody like Cessna or Piper, etc. As an amateur builder, am I a "novice" when I complete it? Will I turn pro after I finish a second one? I'd tend to say that an airplane built by Joe Blow for somebody else is still amateur built, but the owner who applies for the repairman certificate should not be able to get it if they themselves did not build 51%. Scott That is a reasonable question Scott. The traditional answer, that the FAA has used for many years, was the magic number 'three.' If you build the same design once or twice you are learning and still an "amateur" building for "educational" purposes. After the third one, they figure you have learned, and are now building for monetary purposes. The type certification process was originally established to protect people who bought airplanes built by some small company. Some built fine flyable and safe airplanes and some did not. The ones who did not could not get their products through the certification process. Certification requires design review to accepted and published standards for most aspects of the design, including the flyability and handling qualities. Experimental amateur built airplanes, including kits, are not subject to this type of review. I have flown some homebuilt aircraft that I would only characterize as downright dangerous. I have flown others that meet or exceed the requirements for certification in every way. The average is, as you would expect, somewhere between those two extremes. When you allow "professional builders" of "homebuilt" airplanes and allow them to be licensed as "amateur built" it seems to be somewhat outside the intent of the original legislation. It also avoids the certification process which was established for the safety and protection of airplane buyers. This was one of the primary reasons for establishing the CAA, which later became the FAA. Highflyer PS: its flyin time ... 2008 Pinckneyville Rec Aviation Flyin The annual flyin time is coming around again! I finally got to where I could find things in the hangar again, which is a sure indication that it is time to start flyin preparations! The local motels will be filling up fast again so you may want to get your reservations in as soon as you can if you want a close motel room. WHEN: May 16, 17, and 18 this year. Once again, it is the full weekend prior to the Memorial Day official weekend. This has become the traditional historical date for the flyin. It allows folks to plan well ahead to this incredible trek. For many it becomes the cross country trip that they talk about to everyone that will hold still long enough to listen. WHE Pinckneyville DuQuoin Airport, Pinckneyville, Illinois. PJY is the airport identifier. Put K in front if you have a fussy GPS. We are about 80 miles southeast of the Arch in St. Louis. There is a 4001 foot ( have to be over 4000 feet for jets! ) north-south runway ( 18L – 36R ) with an 1800 foot grass runway parallel to the northern half. ( 18R – 36L ) . There is no taxiway. This an access taxiway perpendicular to the runways. We do have instrument approachs again, but they are GPS approachs only. WHAT: The annual t here day get together of the diehards on the rec.aviation newsgroups. Buddy rides all day and hangar flying all night. Other entertainment as happens. Beer, soda, and good food. The PJY barbeque is world renowned, as are the uniquely HOT Italian sausages served on Thursday night. The Red Lady should be flying this year. WHO: Pilots, about to be Pilots, wannabe Pilots, and anybody else who is willing to put up with a bunch of wild eyed folks who talk about airplanes and flying all day and all night. COST: This is not one of those “break the bank” flyins. Highflyer and Mary try to keep the costs in line so that we can have a good time without being rich. We do that because a lot of people who come to the flyin own airplanes. We all know that people who own an airplane are not rich anymore! We try to collect $25 from everyone to defray the cost of the beverages and the groceries. We do breakfast, lunch, and dinner every day. Usually we have baby back ribs, steak, and chicken on Saturday night. Friday night we have something good. No one goes hungry. We do have something for vegetarians. ACCOMODATIONS: Pitch a tent next to your airplane if you like. There is no charge for camping on the field. We have a couple of bathrooms, but no showers. Generally, if someone really would like to shower one of the folks in a motel can help you out. We do have a garden hose. There are places you can park a camper or motorhome near the action. If you are really nice, we can even run you out an extension cord for an electrical hookup. No sewer hookups though. If you want a motel there are several in the area now. The preferred flyin motel is the Mainstreet Inn, in Pinckneyville. The lady who runs it always puts up with our group graciously. One year she even shortsheeted every bed in the place, for a small bribe! Her phone number is 618-357-2128. The rates are quite reasonable. A little fancier is the local Oxbow Bed and Breakfast. This is between the airport and town, right on the edge of town. A number of our folks stay there every year they come and speak very highly of the establishment. Their phone number is 618-357-9839. We always manage to arrange some kind of transportation to and from both of these places. If they are full there are other motels in the area and transportation can usually be managed with no particular problems. HOW: Flying to PJY is the primo way to arrive. If that doesn’t work many fly commercial to St. Louis and rent a car for the last 90 miles from the airport. Whatever works for you works for us! Pinckneyville airport is right on Illinois 127 just six miles south of the town of Pinckneyville. Route 127 is exit 50 off of I-64. The airport is about 30 miles south of I-64. Please send an email to Mary at so that she can get some idea how many steaks to buy for Saturday night dinner! It makes it a lot easier when we have some idea of how many people to plan for meals. |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrote in message ... Larry Dighera wrote: On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 10:36:39 -0600, Gig 601XL Builder wrote in : I have a business associate that bought a "pro-built" RV7. While he was flying home X-C the plane lost power and he safely landed in a field. He got the farmer who owned the land to tow him over beside the barn and then found and A&P to come out and see if he could fix the problem. The logs showed the plane had flown the 40 hours to get out of phase 1 testing. That A&P and another that looked at it later both felt after looking at the plane that there was no way this plane had been flown more than five or six hours. When the buyer looked further at the log book entries he realized that the that a date had been changed and that there was only, originally 3 days between the beginning and the end of the phase 1 testing. He got his money back in the deal after his lawyer made it very clear that there would either be a wire in the buyers account that day or a call would be made to the FAA. Perhaps a prudent purchaser would consider it a good idea to have an A&P look at the aircraft and logs BEFOFE the purchase. The problem that developed and caused the engine failure may or may not have been found by A&P. The log book entry would probably not have been noticed in a hanger. The point is though was that this was purchased from an A&P that was building under the Exp-HB rules buy a buyer that thought that meant he was getting a well constructed aircraft that had been properly built and tested. I think there is a saying about when two fools meet ... Highflyer |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven
It would be very interesting for someone to be charged with operating an illegally built aircraft. How would this be challenged in the courts? It has happened. They merely pull the licenses of both the airplane and the pilot. :-) Highflyer |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven
"Blueskies" wrote in message t... "Ron Wanttaja" wrote in message ... It would be very interesting for someone to be charged with operating an illegally built aircraft. How would this be challenged in the courts? I don't think they'd be charged with operating an illegally-built aircraft, but if they applied for the Repairman Certificate, they could be charged with perjury. In any case, the FAA could just cancel the plane's airworthiness certificate, and the person who bought it from the hired gun would be out the ~$50K-$250K he paid for it. Ron Wanttaja Just because the FAA cancels the airworthiness certificate doesn't make the aircraft any more or less 'airworthy'. Have you seen the justification presented to re-register aircraft every 3 years? Looks like the FAA can't enforce current regulations. So they write more? I seem to remember it costs something like 10 million to certify a 'car' to run on roads in the US of A. The cost to certify an aircraft is insane. There needs to be a middle ground where a sound safe design can be produced (built) without the muda and hindrances of our govment. The call it "Light Sport" and the certification is done by the manufacturer to standards agreed upon by the industry and accepted and recorded by the ASTM. Unfortunately, it does not guarantee a "sound safe design" will be produced. However, a "sound safe design" MAY be produced by the process. Highflyer PS: its flyin time 2008 Pinckneyville Rec Aviation Flyin The annual flyin time is coming around again! I finally got to where I could find things in the hangar again, which is a sure indication that it is time to start flyin preparations! The local motels will be filling up fast again so you may want to get your reservations in as soon as you can if you want a close motel room. WHEN: May 16, 17, and 18 this year. Once again, it is the full weekend prior to the Memorial Day official weekend. This has become the traditional historical date for the flyin. It allows folks to plan well ahead to this incredible trek. For many it becomes the cross country trip that they talk about to everyone that will hold still long enough to listen. WHE Pinckneyville DuQuoin Airport, Pinckneyville, Illinois. PJY is the airport identifier. Put K in front if you have a fussy GPS. We are about 80 miles southeast of the Arch in St. Louis. There is a 4001 foot ( have to be over 4000 feet for jets! ) north-south runway ( 18L – 36R ) with an 1800 foot grass runway parallel to the northern half. ( 18R – 36L ) . There is no taxiway. This an access taxiway perpendicular to the runways. We do have instrument approachs again, but they are GPS approachs only. WHAT: The annual t here day get together of the diehards on the rec.aviation newsgroups. Buddy rides all day and hangar flying all night. Other entertainment as happens. Beer, soda, and good food. The PJY barbeque is world renowned, as are the uniquely HOT Italian sausages served on Thursday night. The Red Lady should be flying this year. WHO: Pilots, about to be Pilots, wannabe Pilots, and anybody else who is willing to put up with a bunch of wild eyed folks who talk about airplanes and flying all day and all night. COST: This is not one of those “break the bank” flyins. Highflyer and Mary try to keep the costs in line so that we can have a good time without being rich. We do that because a lot of people who come to the flyin own airplanes. We all know that people who own an airplane are not rich anymore! We try to collect $25 from everyone to defray the cost of the beverages and the groceries. We do breakfast, lunch, and dinner every day. Usually we have baby back ribs, steak, and chicken on Saturday night. Friday night we have something good. No one goes hungry. We do have something for vegetarians. ACCOMODATIONS: Pitch a tent next to your airplane if you like. There is no charge for camping on the field. We have a couple of bathrooms, but no showers. Generally, if someone really would like to shower one of the folks in a motel can help you out. We do have a garden hose. There are places you can park a camper or motorhome near the action. If you are really nice, we can even run you out an extension cord for an electrical hookup. No sewer hookups though. If you want a motel there are several in the area now. The preferred flyin motel is the Mainstreet Inn, in Pinckneyville. The lady who runs it always puts up with our group graciously. One year she even shortsheeted every bed in the place, for a small bribe! Her phone number is 618-357-2128. The rates are quite reasonable. A little fancier is the local Oxbow Bed and Breakfast. This is between the airport and town, right on the edge of town. A number of our folks stay there every year they come and speak very highly of the establishment. Their phone number is 618-357-9839. We always manage to arrange some kind of transportation to and from both of these places. If they are full there are other motels in the area and transportation can usually be managed with no particular problems. HOW: Flying to PJY is the primo way to arrive. If that doesn’t work many fly commercial to St. Louis and rent a car for the last 90 miles from the airport. Whatever works for you works for us! Pinckneyville airport is right on Illinois 127 just six miles south of the town of Pinckneyville. Route 127 is exit 50 off of I-64. The airport is about 30 miles south of I-64. Please send an email to Mary at so that she can get some idea how many steaks to buy for Saturday night dinner! It makes it a lot easier when we have some idea of how many people to plan for meals. |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven
I guess the real question is why does the FAA feel it's necessary for a homebuilder to have done 51% of the work? Is it to protect him from himself, or to protect the public from him, or are there other reasons? What of the prototypes built by Lockheed or Boeing; 51% of them aren't constructed by a single individual. It seems that there is some fundamental assumption that I am overlooking, because the current FAA 51% mandate seems arbitrary and unfounded to me. All aircraft are licensed under one of a limited set of rules before being allowed to enter our airspace. The only exception to this is a class of flying machines, called "ultralights" that fall under part 103. These aircraft are exempted from some of the oversight because they are so lightweight that they do not present a serious danger to people who are not committing the unnatural act of flight in one of the contraptions. All larger and heavier aircraft can endanger people on the ground who have a right to be protected from fools falling out of the sky into their homes. Theoretically, anyway. The 51% rule has applied since the EAA was first founded back in 1953. Interestingly, building either wings or a fuselage is considered 51% of the aircraft? The idea was to allow the builder to utilize scrounged aircraft parts, and to use standard aircraft engines and propellors. Why is it reasonable? Simple. To license an airplane as Experimental - Amateur built the amateur in question must build a substantial portion of the aircraft. Otherwise it is NOT "amateur built" and must be licensed in some other category, such as Experimental - Exhibition, or Standard Type Certified or some such. How can it possibly be "unconstitutional" to restrict aircraft licensed as "amateur built" to only aircraft that were built by amateurs. By definition "Professionally Built" does NOT fit into this license category and should be licensed in one of the other categories. And can be under the existing rules. All that it requires is compliance with the appropriate regulations to ensure safe operation and acceptable construction standards. Highflyer |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven
the 51% rule only applies to amateur-built aircraft. Why? That seems a little arbitrary to me. If one group is enjoined from employing others to construct an aircraft, why should another group be permitted to do the same thing with impunity? Any individual or group can construct an aircraft. No one has been told they cannot construct an aircraft. The only thing they are being told is that it is illegal to attempt to license an aircraft in the official specific license category of "Experimental - Amateur Built" that wan NOT in fact, built by an amateur. I do not have a problem with that. Any aircraft not built by an amateur can indeed be licensed, but only in the appropriate category. If they proceed to license the aircraft correctly there is no problem and no objection. The only problem is with people who make known false official statements to allow an outcome they deem favorable, if illegal. Rather like saying "I didn't make enough money last year to file income tax. All those W-2's with my name on them are really not mine or are mistaken and should be ignored." Highflyer |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven
It may be reasonable, but no one has provided a logical rational for it yet in this discussion. If you believe that, you cannot read. By the way, rational is used incorrectly in that sentence. It is used as "rationale" instead of it own meaning. :-) Highflyer |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven
Larry Dighera wrote: One of his stupidest post ever. And that's saying
something. Larry I have no problem with Kit Built at all. I'm building one myself. As far as where the US Government gets it's authority to regulate our airspace I would assume it is from the same place where it gets it authority to create the Department of Transportation which is probably the Interstate Commerce clause of the constitution. I really don't have either the time or desire to look it up. But just so you know you probably won't find it worded very clearly. The reason for that is because there was little war in the mid 1800s that changed the face of what the federal government can an can't do. If you don't like well either build a time machine and go sign up to fight for the South. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Call to Arms from Richard VanGrunsven | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 181 | May 1st 08 03:14 AM |
Flew home and boy are my arms tired! | Steve Schneider | Owning | 11 | September 5th 07 12:16 AM |
ASW-19 Moment Arms | jcarlyle | Soaring | 9 | January 30th 06 10:52 PM |
[!] Russian Arms software sale | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 18th 04 05:51 PM | |
Dick VanGrunsven commutes to aviation | Fitzair4 | Home Built | 2 | August 12th 04 11:19 PM |