If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Flying Car
Quite interesting.. this sort of machine can bridge the gap between GA
and the practicality of using small airplanes for commuting. "Either way, it boils down to this: You sit down behind the steering wheel, drive to the runway, unfold two wings and take off. You can fly 500 miles on a tank of gas -- regular unleaded -- and when you land, you simply fold up the wings and drive where you want to go. At the end of the day, you fly back, drive home and park inside your garage." http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2009/0...lying-car.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Flying Car
Little Endian wrote:
Quite interesting.. this sort of machine can bridge the gap between GA and the practicality of using small airplanes for commuting. "Either way, it boils down to this: You sit down behind the steering wheel, drive to the runway, unfold two wings and take off. You can fly 500 miles on a tank of gas -- regular unleaded -- and when you land, you simply fold up the wings and drive where you want to go. At the end of the day, you fly back, drive home and park inside your garage." http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2009/0...lying-car.html "A Boston-area company plans to begin flight tests this year of a two-seater airplane that moonlights as a car." Has the timetable slipped? Wasn't the proof-of-concept vehicle supposed to fly in 2008? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Flying Car
In article ,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: Little Endian wrote: Quite interesting.. this sort of machine can bridge the gap between GA and the practicality of using small airplanes for commuting. "Either way, it boils down to this: You sit down behind the steering wheel, drive to the runway, unfold two wings and take off. You can fly 500 miles on a tank of gas -- regular unleaded -- and when you land, you simply fold up the wings and drive where you want to go. At the end of the day, you fly back, drive home and park inside your garage." http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2009/0...lying-car.html "A Boston-area company plans to begin flight tests this year of a two-seater airplane that moonlights as a car." Has the timetable slipped? Wasn't the proof-of-concept vehicle supposed to fly in 2008? One thing for sure about "flying cars", "Skycars," etc. is that balonium is NOT in short supply! -- Remove _'s from email address to talk to me. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Flying Car
On Jan 22, 9:48*pm, Orval Fairbairn
wrote: In article , *"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: Little Endian wrote: Quite interesting.. this sort of machine can bridge the gap between GA and the practicality of using small airplanes for commuting. "Either way, it boils down to this: You sit down behind the steering wheel, drive to the runway, unfold two wings and take off. You can fly 500 miles on a tank of gas -- regular unleaded -- and when you land, you simply fold up the wings and drive where you want to go. At the end of the day, you fly back, drive home and park inside your garage." http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2009/0...lying-car.html "A Boston-area company plans to begin flight tests this year of a two-seater airplane that moonlights as a car." Has the timetable slipped? *Wasn't the proof-of-concept vehicle supposed to fly in 2008? One thing for sure about "flying cars", "Skycars," etc. is that balonium is NOT in short supply! Yeah. Another attempt resulting in another lousy car and lousy airplane. The two just aren't compatible in any efficient way. So many compromises have to be made that they just don't make practical sense. After more than 40 years of following such things I'm amazed that people are still trying it. Just think: One of these that's light enough to fly will have rotten crashworthiness as a car. It will blow off the highway in a strong crosswind. It will suffer awesome parking-lot damage. And it will attract large numbers of curious tire-kickers that will damage it. So it won't be light at all, once it's strong enough to take some abuse and has some resistance to being tossed around by the wake of every passing semi. Its weight will make it a poor airplane with a high stall speed. Adding to the weight will be the wing folding and locking mechanisms, wheel drivers, sturdier tires and heavier brakes, propeller clutches, cooling system (gotta keep it cool somehow with no prop blast) and so forth. So many, many expensive compromises. That's why Molt Taylor's Aerocar is in a museum and not found on used-car lots. Dan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Flying Car
On Jan 24, 5:55*pm, VOR-DME wrote:
In article , says... Little Endian wrote: Quite interesting.. this sort of machine can bridge the gap between GA and the practicality of using small airplanes for commuting. "Either way, it boils down to this: You sit down behind the steering wheel, drive to the runway, unfold two wings and take off. You can fly 500 miles on a tank of gas -- regular unleaded -- and when you land, you simply fold up the wings and drive where you want to go. At the end of the day, you fly back, drive home and park inside your garage." http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2009/0...lying-car.html "A Boston-area company plans to begin flight tests this year of a two-seater airplane that moonlights as a car." Has the timetable slipped? *Wasn't the proof-of-concept vehicle supposed to fly in 2008? It's slipped more than that! POC was set for 1947, and again in 1958, then in 1965,71,78,85,91 etc etc. . . I figure at any given moment there must be a half dozen car-planes in various prototype stages around the world, each seeming to claim they have invented something no one ever thought of before. When a slow news day comes along, journalists have a shortcut key "CTRL-SHFT-CP" or something and out pops a fully developed story about the new invention. In reality, as the years go by this "invention" becomes less and less viable, because of increasing regulatory environment and liability concerns. Now we've added fuel prices and "green" politics to all that! It "almost" could have been possible for a limited production run for some of the post-war versions, when you could pretty much do what you wanted if you could afford it, but today it is completely impossible. Hard to imagine how or why any developer would waste time and resources on an inherently non-viable concept.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - How many airports have taxiways that provide immediate access to roadways? Those we use have gates and getting them open, especially at odd times, would not be easy. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Flying Car
On Jan 24, 6:19*am, a wrote:
How many airports have taxiways that provide immediate access to roadways? Those we use have gates and getting them open, especially at odd times, *would not be easy. I'm just trying to imagine how many people want to set aside $30/hr for engine overhaul as they cruise down the freeway. -Robert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Flying Car
a wrote:
How many airports have taxiways that provide immediate access to roadways? Those we use have gates and getting them open, especially at odd times, would not be easy. How does it work these days when you drop in with an aircraft on a trailer? The earliest article I have read about flying cars was in a magazine (something similar in spirit to popular mechanics, but different and not in English -- it was called 'Je Sais Tout', i.e., I know everything, a bit presumptuous but quite neat) published in 1929 (I believe I still have it around); it is definitely not new. The thing that I find interesting with such projects (e.g., the TerraFugia project) is that it might lead to the development of techniques that could be actually usable (even though it falls far short of the intended goal); For instance, a more practical way to fold / unfold wings than is available with sailplanes (which more often than not require heavy lifting by several very patient and skilled participants...); something that would make it possible for one person to easily store into a trailer (to take home, or park at the local airport far cheaper than in a hangar) and back to a flyable condition, could be quite a neat thing. --Sylvain |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Flying Car
In article ,
Sylvain wrote: a wrote: How many airports have taxiways that provide immediate access to roadways? Those we use have gates and getting them open, especially at odd times, would not be easy. How does it work these days when you drop in with an aircraft on a trailer? The one time I showed up at a larger airport with an aircraft trailer (albeit with the aircraft in the airport, and the goal being to get it *out*...) we had to hunt down someone official-like, who then sat in his truck watching us suspiciously while we took the thing apart and loaded onto the trailer. If we had had the misfortune of trying this when nobody official was around, I think we would have simply been screwed. For instance, a more practical way to fold / unfold wings than is available with sailplanes (which more often than not require heavy lifting by several very patient and skilled participants...); something that would make it possible for one person to easily store into a trailer (to take home, or park at the local airport far cheaper than in a hangar) and back to a flyable condition, could be quite a neat thing. Sailplane assembly isn't as bad as you make it sound. *Most* of the time, it takes one reasonably strong guy who knows what he's doing and one medium-strength guy who can follow directions, and the process of putting the wings on just takes a few minutes. When you have a heavy two-seater that nobody has assembled in a year then, yeah, heavy lifting by several very patient and skilled participants is accurate. But that's a small minority. In addition, nice rigs can be obtained for a relatively small price (relative to aviation, anyway, typically 1-2AMU) which allow a single person to assemble relatively quickly. And yes, they are neat. Something that would self-fold to trailering size at the push of a button would be very nice. With the somewhat laxer weight and aerodynamic constraints of a powered aircraft it seems that such a thing might well be possible, and it would certainly save a lot on hangar fees. -- Mike Ash Radio Free Earth Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Flying Car
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:41:57 -0800, Sylvain wrote:
How does it work these days when you drop in with an aircraft on a trailer? For instance, a more practical way to fold / unfold wings than is available with sailplanes (which more often than not require heavy lifting by several very patient and skilled participants...); something that would make it possible for one person to easily store into a trailer (to take home, or park at the local airport far cheaper than in a hangar) and back to a flyable condition, could be quite a neat thing. My airplane (a Kolb) is stored, wings folded, in an enclosed trailer all the time. During the warm weather I keep the trailer at the airport for convenience, for the same price as outdoor tiedown (about 1/4 the cost of a hangar); in the winter I keep it at home and tow it to the airport when I want to fly. All the local pilots, even those who don't keep their planes there, know the gate combination. Unfolding and preflighting the plane takes about 15 minutes, and I can do it alone. The other local airport, which sadly just closed, didn't even have a gate. -Dana -- Things should be made as simple as possible, but not any simpler.-- Albert Einstein |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Duxford Flying Legends 2008 - B-17 Flying Fortresses - 19/26 - dx08fl_b17_pinklady_0712_0909.jpg (1/1) - 190 kb | D. St-Sanvain | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 17th 08 07:55 PM |
Duxford Flying Legends 2008 - B-17 Flying Fortresses - 13/26 - dx08fl_b17_libertybelle_0712_1027.jpg (1/1) - 196 kb | D. St-Sanvain | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 17th 08 07:54 PM |
Duxford Flying Legends 2008 - B-17 Flying Fortresses - 12/26 - dx08fl_b17_libertybelle_0712_1026.jpg (1/1) - 194 kb | D. St-Sanvain | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 17th 08 07:54 PM |
Duxford Flying Legends 2008 - B-17 Flying Fortresses - 11/26 - dx08fl_b17_libertybelle_0712_1022.jpg (1/1) - 173 kb | D. St-Sanvain | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 17th 08 07:54 PM |
Duxford Flying Legends 2008 - B-17 Flying Fortresses - 10/26 - dx08fl_b17_libertybelle_0712_0904.jpg (1/1) - 188 kb | D. St-Sanvain | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 17th 08 07:54 PM |