If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#481
|
|||
|
|||
Thrown out of an FBO...
mike regish wrote:
Which is the exact kind of thinking that makes religion, all religion, a truly dangerous thing. I think your religion of atheism or naturalism or whatever you practice is the most dangerous of all. Matt |
#482
|
|||
|
|||
Thrown out of an FBO...
Crash Lander wrote:
"mike regish" wrote in message . .. Which is the exact kind of thinking that makes religion, all religion, a truly dangerous thing. mike Like it or not, religion runs the world. How many wars were NOT religion based? All of the wars that were based on economics and greed ... which is most of them. Religion is often blamed, but seldom the root cause. Matt |
#483
|
|||
|
|||
Thrown out of an FBO...
Crash Lander wrote:
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... Like it or not, religion runs the world. How many wars were NOT religion based? Lots. Perhaps, but I'd suggest more were religion based than were not. But you'd be incorrect. Matt |
#484
|
|||
|
|||
Thrown out of an FBO...
Jose wrote:
If we evolved from random combination of elements, why haven't we evolved to grow back amputated limbs? We have. We lost that ability. Why is an interesting question, and I think the answer is that it "costs" too much. As life gets more complex, the repair systems need to be more sophisticated, and the overhead involved in carrying around such a repair system makes those individuals less likely to survive and reproduce. Ironic, isn't it. I think we just found someone less intelligent that the former girlfriend you were talking about. Matt |
#485
|
|||
|
|||
Thrown out of an FBO...
mike regish wrote:
How about rational thought? How about not using the false promise of an afterlife with 72 virgins to convince otherwise good men to murder innocents? So Matt, why does god hate amputees? So, Mike, why can't you think rationally? Matt |
#486
|
|||
|
|||
Thrown out of an FBO...
I think it's entirely likely something similar may be found with respect to
homosexuality. Not that failure to find such a thing would change my views on it, but to argue that homosexuality is somehow contrary to evolution is overly simplistic thinking at its worst. The mere fact that it exists, and in such relative prevalence (as genetic "defects" go, it's pretty common...and I do use that word "defect" very loosely), strongly suggests that in the greater scheme of things, homosexuality is important for the greater good in some way. That's an interesting theory, and it's one that I've considered. Homosexuality seems to exist throughout nature, in varying numbers, in almost every species, so it appears to have some sort of evolutionary advantage. Logically, there must be a reason, or it would cease to exist, right? Maybe not. There are evolutionary processes going on around us all the time. There are also evolutionary processes that we, as humans, have done our best to counter. Poor eye sight, for example, has been pretty well eliminated as a reason to die -- therefore, more and more humans are being born that need glasses. (I, for one, have benefitted greatly from this turn of events. 5000 years ago, I would have died before my 20th birthday, long before I had the opportunity to reproduce, simply because I've needed eye glasses since 5th grade.) IMHO, homosexuality is probably more akin to poor eyesight than it is to any evolutionary *advantage*. We have simply learned to exist with it, for no apparent evolutionary reason. Which, again, is not to say I've got anything AGAINST homosexuality. You continue to make this into a gay-bashing thing, Pete, and it's not. I don't think any God is going to send homosexuals to any "hell", and I don't think that homosexuals should be discriminated against because of their orientation. I simply don't CARE. Homosexuality is an evolutionary dead end, an accident of nature, no different than any problem or trait any of us may inherit or face, and gay folks should be left to do whatever they want, unhindered, in the privacy of their own homes. In discussions with friends about this issue, this "live and let live" attitude towards gays seems to prevail, at least amongst my fellow baby-boomers. No one hates gays, no one wants to harm them in any way. Why, then, has this become such a problem for homosexuals? There seems to be a deep-seated (seemingly self-destructive) urge for gays to vocalize the "marriage" issue on the political stage, and I truly believe that they would be advancing their agenda more effectively if they concentrated on equal rights, not equal labels. But enough of this! How in the heck we went from FBO courtesy to THIS is beyond me. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#487
|
|||
|
|||
Thrown out of an FBO...
Gatt,
For what? You're actually trying sensible discussion with this nutcase? -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#488
|
|||
|
|||
Thrown out of an FBO...
"Crash Lander" wrote in message
... Homosexual people cry discrimination all the time. I can't understand this. We have bars, and clubs where you go and have a drink with friends. Gay people feel the need to have 'gay bars, and gay clubs'. What's wrong with the bars and clubs that are already there, and what has a bar or club got to do with your sexual preference? Gay bars do not exclude straight customers, just as (for example) sports bars do not exclude non-sports-fans. In contrast, however, a gay couple holding hands or kissing (just doing what many straight couples around them are doing) would, in many straight bars, be kicked out, or even subject to violent attacks. Yet you summarize that state of affairs by saying that most of the intolerance comes from the gay side. You aren't even making a token effort to connect your conclusion to reality! If you seriously believe what you claim to believe, then I propose the following experiment. Visit a liberal US city, go to a gay bar with a female friend, and hold hands with her. See if anyone even notices or comments. Next, visit a "traditional values" town and go to a straight bar with a male friend. Quietly hold hands with him, and report back to us about what happens next. If I'm in a bar having a beer, I'll still drink with you. I don't expect your sexual preference to be a required part of the conversation! A few minutes ago, after you recited a litany of Amos 'n' Andy-like stereotypes about gay people, you expressed your desire to keep "separate". But now you want to go out for drinks? Sexual orientation almost always comes up in casual conversation. You display your sexual orientation every time you mention your wife or girlfriend, or hold hands with her in public. There's no reason for it to be otherwise for gay people. |
#489
|
|||
|
|||
Thrown out of an FBO...
"Grumman-581" wrote in message
news On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 03:20:58 +0000, Ron Lee wrote: Er, um, Mike. Radical muslims are everywhere. Many countries in the middle east, Europe, and yes even in the USA. Well, I've got a truck and a chain... Just need to find a road with Mohammed's name on it.. Earlier, you were merely advocating genocide. But now you've escalated to posting an actual death threat. Are you aware that the latter is a serious crime? It's astonishing that some right wingers in this conversation have bemoaned "liberal hatred", but cannot bring themselves to object when someone repeatedly calls for the extermination of a billion Muslims, or threatens to lynch some. George Orwell is being outdone he genocide is peace; marriage is hatred; lynching is democracy. |
#490
|
|||
|
|||
Thrown out of an FBO...
No. It is merely evidence that Muslim terrorists may have a longer time
frame than the next quarter, or that successful acts of terrorism are harder than we imagine. I doubt it. I think it's more likely that our president has access to and control of an immense arsenal of anti-terrorism weaponry, and has used them effectively to prevent further attacks. Of course, wrapped up with all that is the theory that 9/11 so seriously knotted up the American public that further attacks were unnecessary. Americans are known the world over for short attention spans, and the inability to effectively fight a long war. In short, all the terrorists had to do was wait, and win. Witness our last election. Again, I'm not supporting any POV w/r/t terrorism and such. I'm merely rejecting faulty reasoning and faith based logic. It's only one possibility -- but IMHO it is the most likely and logical one. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I think old planes should be thrown away !!! | Tristan Beeline | Restoration | 6 | January 20th 06 04:05 AM |
Rocks Thrown at Border Patrol Chopper | [email protected] | Piloting | 101 | September 1st 05 12:10 PM |