If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#201
|
|||
|
|||
Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... The facts don't seem to support that argument for anyone actually taking the trouble to READ my responses to him. -- Dudley Henriques Sure it does. The more noise you help Bertie create over here, the more people will be encouraged to move to other groups. You might have some of the people here "snowed", but I'm not buying it. Tweaking Anthony fits right in with spamming for POA. |
#202
|
|||
|
|||
Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion
Abbott wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... RST Engineering wrote: But Dudley, you must admit, sometimes polishing a turd is impossible. Jim Either way, the responsibility lies with the instructor. The student is the workpiece the instructor must complete. -- Dudley Henriques This of course assumes the instructor passes everything that comes through the door. This might work for some instructors. GOOD instructors engage in an ongoing evaluation of each student they take on. If at ANY time the GOOD instructor realizes that a specific student isn't developing the required attitude or attitude change as the case might be, it's incumbent on the instructor to at that point call in an outside evaluation for that student; the continuance of instruction to be decided after that evaluation. For good CFI's, the question of money or profit doesn't enter the picture when evaluating a student's attitude toward flying. There are indeed instructors out here who don't operate this way. For them, the fact that the student exists on the schedule is a consideration. Not so for the instructor doing the job properly. It is admittedily a two way street. Each student must be given the very best the instructor has to offer. In return, the instructor must DEMAND the same from the student. There can indeed come a time with a specific student showing signs of an "attitude issue" where an instructor should disengage. Some CFI's can do this, some won't. It's a personal choice for the CFI. Personally, I have had several students with "bad attitudes" that did not respond directly to instruction designed to change that attitude. To eliminate myself as the source of the failure to communicate, I in each case had the affected student evaluated by another instructor. In every instance (3 in all) the student was evaluated with an attitude problem by the second instructor. None of these 3 students were graduated from our program. I can't speak for their eventual disposition within the training system. GOOD CFI's don't graduate students with bad attitudes into the system. -- Dudley Henriques You can say more and explain less than a junior high school girl. Has the fact that people don't seem to be lining up in droves behind you on these things dawned on you yet? :-) -- Dudley Henriques |
#203
|
|||
|
|||
Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... Abbott wrote: "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... If you are reading anything "complicated" into what I have said, I'm afraid you might be misinterpreting or misunderstanding the entire point. Flight instruction in NO WAY has to be complicated, and instructors who over complicate things with the way they interface with a student might be in need of some added instruction themselves. Don't read over complication into a written explanation. In practice, what you are reading is actually the epitome of simplicity :-) -- Dudley Henriques Then how did you ever give instruction. I'm sure you could lecture a have hour on just the door latch. Max, what I can't figure out about you is why you bother to do all the name changes when you post here. You seem to come up as the same message source under all your names. Hell, I'm the worst computer guy in the world, and even I have you nailed. Why not simply post under the same name all the time? Doesn't make any sense at all. It's childish actually. -- Dudley Henriques Sure, you don't have a clue, do ya. Bull****. Let's just say from this point forward I don't have a name. I don't need one. I'm not here to "be some body". |
#204
|
|||
|
|||
Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... Has the fact that people don't seem to be lining up in droves behind you on these things dawned on you yet? :-) -- Dudley Henriques It's not necessary, I never expected it. |
#205
|
|||
|
|||
Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion
Abbott wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... The facts don't seem to support that argument for anyone actually taking the trouble to READ my responses to him. -- Dudley Henriques Sure it does. The more noise you help Bertie create over here, the more people will be encouraged to move to other groups. You might have some of the people here "snowed", but I'm not buying it. Tweaking Anthony fits right in with spamming for POA. Don't get it do you Max? The only thing I have going with Bertie is when we "speak" a bit back channel on aviation matters. Here, I leave him alone and he shows me the same courtesy. We don't "back each other up" at all. Now YOU on the other hand Max, are another matter. Neither of us like you. Personally I don't mind trading jabs with you as every post you make demonstrates the absolute differences between us all that much more. -- Dudley Henriques |
#206
|
|||
|
|||
Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... Abbott wrote: "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... The facts don't seem to support that argument for anyone actually taking the trouble to READ my responses to him. -- Dudley Henriques Sure it does. The more noise you help Bertie create over here, the more people will be encouraged to move to other groups. You might have some of the people here "snowed", but I'm not buying it. Tweaking Anthony fits right in with spamming for POA. Don't get it do you Max? The only thing I have going with Bertie is when we "speak" a bit back channel on aviation matters. Here, I leave him alone and he shows me the same courtesy. We don't "back each other up" at all. Now YOU on the other hand Max, are another matter. Neither of us like you. Personally I don't mind trading jabs with you as every post you make demonstrates the absolute differences between us all that much more. Bull****. All of it. |
#207
|
|||
|
|||
Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion
Abbott wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... Abbott wrote: "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... wrote: Mxsmanic wrote: writes: You sure are fixated on "safe". Yes, and that's a very healthy fixation in aviation. By definition, any fixation is an abnormal and unhealthy condition. 1. The act or process of fixing or fixating. 2. An obsessive preoccupation. 3. Psychology A strong attachment to a person or thing, especially such an attachment formed in childhood or infancy and manifested in immature or neurotic behavior that persists throughout life. Oh hell, I guess this means no more Pamela Anderson for me . :-) -- Dudley Henriques Or Usenet. Could be. They're both fantasy worlds. -- Dudley Henriques You sound more like Anthony ever day. Hi Max. -- Dudley Henriques |
#208
|
|||
|
|||
Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion
Abbott wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... Abbott wrote: "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... The facts don't seem to support that argument for anyone actually taking the trouble to READ my responses to him. -- Dudley Henriques Sure it does. The more noise you help Bertie create over here, the more people will be encouraged to move to other groups. You might have some of the people here "snowed", but I'm not buying it. Tweaking Anthony fits right in with spamming for POA. Don't get it do you Max? The only thing I have going with Bertie is when we "speak" a bit back channel on aviation matters. Here, I leave him alone and he shows me the same courtesy. We don't "back each other up" at all. Now YOU on the other hand Max, are another matter. Neither of us like you. Personally I don't mind trading jabs with you as every post you make demonstrates the absolute differences between us all that much more. Bull****. All of it. Afraid not Maxie. Anyone viewing "message source" in their news reader for both Maxwell, Bunyip Slayer, and Abbott will come up with exactly the same data, even to your newsreader version AND build. -- Dudley Henriques |
#209
|
|||
|
|||
Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion
Abbott wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... Abbott wrote: "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... If you are reading anything "complicated" into what I have said, I'm afraid you might be misinterpreting or misunderstanding the entire point. Flight instruction in NO WAY has to be complicated, and instructors who over complicate things with the way they interface with a student might be in need of some added instruction themselves. Don't read over complication into a written explanation. In practice, what you are reading is actually the epitome of simplicity :-) -- Dudley Henriques Then how did you ever give instruction. I'm sure you could lecture a have hour on just the door latch. Max, what I can't figure out about you is why you bother to do all the name changes when you post here. You seem to come up as the same message source under all your names. Hell, I'm the worst computer guy in the world, and even I have you nailed. Why not simply post under the same name all the time? Doesn't make any sense at all. It's childish actually. -- Dudley Henriques Sure, you don't have a clue, do ya. Bull****. Let's just say from this point forward I don't have a name. I don't need one. I'm not here to "be some body". Obviously :-) -- Dudley Henriques |
#210
|
|||
|
|||
Viable alternatives for serious aviation discussion
Abbott wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... Has the fact that people don't seem to be lining up in droves behind you on these things dawned on you yet? :-) -- Dudley Henriques It's not necessary, I never expected it. Actually I expected at least a few takers for your crap. Anyone posting on a forum for as long as I have has to have made a few enemies, and I'm sure I have a few here. Knowing this, it seems even my enemies don't want to support the crap you've been selling. -- Dudley Henriques |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sonex Kitplane as a viable aircraft for Sportsman aerobatic contests | [email protected] | Aerobatics | 0 | April 24th 08 04:16 PM |
Aviation magazine - 100LL alternatives | Not Me[_2_] | Home Built | 1 | June 15th 07 02:04 AM |
PDA mounting alternatives | Jack Glendening | Soaring | 15 | October 14th 05 08:03 PM |
SWR meter Alternatives | c hinds | Home Built | 1 | June 2nd 04 07:39 PM |
Commanche alternatives? | John Cook | Military Aviation | 99 | March 24th 04 03:22 AM |