If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Outside reference in IMC
Mxsmanic wrote in
: BDS writes: Here is what the FARs say: (g) Logging instrument flight time. (1) A person may log instrument time only for that flight time when the person operates the aircraft solely by reference to instruments under actual or simulated instrument flight conditions. To me this means that technically you cannot log instrument time if you are using outside references, regardless of the type of flight plan you are on. It also means that you cannot log instrument time if you are depending on physical sensations. That would not be "solely by reference to instruments." Hey, fjukktard, we use physical sensation to trim the airplane. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Outside reference in IMC
Mxsmanic wrote in
: writes: Yep, I didn't get it either but in the full scheme of things, I wasn't complaining, as at least I had an instructor who wasn't afraid of touching a cloud. Even a cloud with a 757 hiding inside? Is a macho instructor better than a competent instructor? Is it bad to be afraid of something that can get you killed? You're a total ****ing ignoramus Anthony. Saying one had an instructor who was not afraid to touch a cloud has absolutely nothing to do with machismo or flaunting FAA regulations, be they VFR, IFR, or any other area. You have no idea what that phrase really means and are simply displaying your lack of knowlege about aviation just so you can see your post in the nesgroup. You are a complete and total fraud. You have no real intereste in aviation. What a maroon! |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Outside reference in IMC
Buster Hymen writes:
Saying one had an instructor who was not afraid to touch a cloud has absolutely nothing to do with machismo or flaunting FAA regulations, be they VFR, IFR, or any other area. Yes, it does. The FAA wants you to keep a certain distance from clouds because under VFR you are maintaining visual separation, and you cannot see what might be inside those clouds. If you get to close, and another aircraft comes out of the cloud, you may not have time to react safely. What a maroon! Do you see the irony in this? |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Outside reference in IMC
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Buster Hymen writes: Saying one had an instructor who was not afraid to touch a cloud has absolutely nothing to do with machismo or flaunting FAA regulations, be they VFR, IFR, or any other area. Yes, it does. The FAA wants you to keep a certain distance from clouds because under VFR you are maintaining visual separation, and you cannot see what might be inside those clouds. If you get to close, and another aircraft comes out of the cloud, you may not have time to react safely. What a maroon! Do you see the irony in this? You are soooo ****ing stooopid. You can legally AND safely fly 50' (and less) from a cloud while VFR. Been there, done that, no big deal. Something you won't learn on MSFS, you fjukktard. All your posts are predicated on your total lack of understanding of real aviation. All you do is regurgitate stuff which in your total lack of experience you think might be applicable, but in fact is wrong. You don't understand aviation one whit. You never have and you never will. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Outside reference in IMC
Buster Hymen writes:
You are soooo ****ing stooopid. You can legally AND safely fly 50' (and less) from a cloud while VFR. Been there, done that, no big deal. In Class C, D, E, and G, you must maintain 2000' of lateral clearance from the clouds under VFR (except under 1200' AGL in Class G), below 10,000' MSL. Flying only 50' away from a cloud under VFR is illegal under these conditions. The main reason for this is that there may be other aircraft in the clouds. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Outside reference in IMC
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... Flying only 50' away from a cloud under VFR is illegal under these conditions. It's also illegal while intoxicated, if you don't have a pilot certficiate, if you don't have a medical, if you are taking prescription meds, and a host of other reasons. That's not what he was referring to either. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Outside reference in IMC
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... In Class C, D, E, and G, you must maintain 2000' of lateral clearance from the clouds under VFR (except under 1200' AGL in Class G), below 10,000' MSL. The above statement is incorrect. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Outside reference in IMC
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Buster Hymen writes: You are soooo ****ing stooopid. You can legally AND safely fly 50' (and less) from a cloud while VFR. Been there, done that, no big deal. In Class C, D, E, and G, you must maintain 2000' of lateral clearance from the clouds under VFR (except under 1200' AGL in Class G), below 10,000' MSL. Flying only 50' away from a cloud under VFR is illegal under these conditions. The main reason for this is that there may be other aircraft in the clouds. As ususal, Anthony, you don't understand. You're just a dip **** who doesn't understand the real world of aviation. We're not playing MSFS here. Try reading what I said. Then try to think. I know that's a major effort for you and probably causes you much pain, but try. I said that one can legally and safely fly 50' from a cloud. Only your incompetent knowledge of aviation causes you to claim otherwise. You are, as you usually do, proving to the world that you don't know **** from shinola. Legally means that no violation of a FAR occurs. Do you understand that? Its a simple concept. No FAR violation = legal! Got that? Apparently not, as your response implies violation of the FARS. No violation of the FARs occured. I wrote nothing of the sort, you moron. All you did was regurgitate the rules for VFR flight in class C, D, E, and G airspace without the slightest understanding of what you were reading. In fact, you managed to inroduce a subtle error in your regurgitation. You don't begin to understand. You never have and never will. When it comes to aviation, you're a total failure, just as you've been in all the other endeavors in your life. Abject failure describes you to a T. I'll say it again. Under VFR flight rules, there is a way you can legally and safely fly 50' from a cloud (above, below, or laterally). You, Anthony, obviously don't know how. But you won't admit that you don't and, instead, demonstrating that you don't know **** from shinola, incompetently conclude it can't be done. Wrong again, fjukktard. Wrong again. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Outside reference in IMC
"Tina" wrote in message ... One could legally be operating in VMC under IFR or IMC under VFR. I think you are only half right. You can surely operate IFR in VMC -- and there are places where that's actually required, but if you are in IMC, which is defined as in conditions below VFR minima, you had best be flying IFR. Or outside of controlled airspace. Al G |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Outside reference in IMC
Statement is still true, isn't it? VFR minima are different in
uncontrolled airspace, and since IMC is pretty much defined as weather conditions in which VFR may not be flown, yada yada yada. Or maybe I'm missing something too. I will confess I can't remember when we were last in uncontrolled airspace! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sandblasting reference? | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 7 | November 20th 07 07:01 AM |
FAR Reference - Self Fueling | Ben Smith | Owning | 8 | April 8th 04 11:07 PM |
Engineering reference: | Richard Lamb | Home Built | 1 | March 14th 04 03:18 PM |
For General Reference | El Roto | Home Built | 0 | February 23rd 04 04:00 AM |
looking for modern F-4 reference | Rob van Riel | Military Aviation | 1 | November 13th 03 08:39 PM |