A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New Charts to have DC ADIZ on them



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old February 6th 04, 04:58 AM
Judah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My guess is that it is all a political ploy. The FAA doesn't have to
justify the effectiveness of the security itself, just the ADIZ
implementation. They do this by saying that the ADIZ is the only way to
positively identify all aircraft within 30 NM of DC, as per the
requirement imposed upon them by the TSA, SS, Hom-a-land Security
Commission, or whomever. I would think that it is not within the scope of
the FAA's responsibility (or even their privileged knowledge) to identify
the reasons behind the request for this positive identification, only
that they have acted appropriately upon it, and will continue to do so
until the request is rescinded/cancelled/eliminated.

They probably do not have access to the so-called "sensitive chatter
transmissions" or whatever other bull**** "evidence" the buearacrats have
to justify the request. But again, in a buearacracy, it's not about sound
logic - it's about passing the buck while creating the illusion of
accountability. So when Congress gets up and asks for accountability from
a place where they know accountability is not available, the public (or
in this case, the pilots and airlines) think they are doing something
positive for them.

Now they can tell all the pilots and airline execs, "Look what we are
doing to support you, now vote for me!" And they think we are as stupid
as the rest of the public and don't know what's really going on...



"John T" wrote in
ws.com:

"Jake Brodsky" wrote in message


According to AOPA, Congress is requiring the *FAA* to justify the ADIZ
to them every two months. --WTF?

Shouldn't this request have been made of the Department of Homeland
Security? How did this thing get so sidetracked? Does anyone think
the FAA wants anything to do with an ADIZ over Washington DC?


The FAA still implements the airspace restrictions even if said
restrictions are at the behest of other organizations.

My question is: What will happen if the FAA says the restrictions are
not justified?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RNAV Enroute CHarts John R. Copeland Instrument Flight Rules 0 September 20th 04 03:33 PM
how to get NACO online charts conveniently? Dave Butler Instrument Flight Rules 41 June 16th 04 03:14 PM
Is the DC ADIZ on the charts? Snowbird Piloting 38 November 19th 03 03:27 AM
that Mooney in DC ADIZ Cub Driver Piloting 10 November 13th 03 09:15 PM
NACO charts - why have a reference circle? Bob Gardner Instrument Flight Rules 5 September 6th 03 01:15 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.