If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Region 4 S: ELT Mandatory
I just received a note from Lanier Frantz stating that all competitors
at R4S must have an ELT. I understand the reason for this decision, but I question whether it will have the intended effect. I have long been against mandatory ELT use in soaring competitions for one reason only: they do not operate as advertised. While 121.5 MHz ELTs are useful for locating a crash scene, they are nearly useless as a life saving device. And, in fact, these units only activate properly in about 12% of crashes. The management of R4S has made this decision for safety reasons... for the safety of their own and emergency personnel. This is laudible. But if such a decision is to be carried through to its intended ends, it needs to be more specific. It should require that all pilots use 406 MHz ELTs (as Peter Masak was using) and recommend the use of GPS PLBs. This would dramitically improve the chances of proper activation as well as early and pinpoint detection. Of course, there's always a but... A 406 MHz unit will cost approximately $1500. A GPS PLB about $800. A 121.5 MHz ELT can be had for under $400. Which will pilots choose? The nearly useless, and soon to be obsolete (2/1/2009) low cost alternative offered by soaring parts suppliers nationwide. R4S is mandating a placebo. Again, I understand and commned their willingness to take a stand, but clearly some more thought is warranted. Here are a pair of links to help you (the pilot) cut through the emotional aspects and understand what your dollars are buying... or aren't. http://www.sarsat.noaa.gov/emerbcns.html http://beacons.amsa.gov.au/What_is/index.asp Frankly, given this information, I find it unethical for suppliers to continue selling 121.5 ELTs. Peter was using a 406 transmitter -- the state of the art. Had he been using a 121.5 unit, there is less than a 1 in 8 chance it would have activated, and assuming it worked properly, the search area would have been at least 8 times larger (500 nm^2 versus 65 nm^2). Even with the improved unit, it took nearly 16 hours to accurately locate and arrive at the crash site. It's important to recognize that ELTs are not life saving devices. They are, at best, crash site locaters. Rapid, life-saving response to a remote crash site can only happen with a GPS PLB (300-foot accuracy, several minuts to detection after activation). But these have problems as well. For instance, they are not automatic. The pilot would need to recognize danger and activate the unit before the accident or losing consciousness. Apologies for wandering here. There's alot to be thought about. By pilots and contest organizers. This is a response to a well intentioned, but not necessarily well thought out decision. It represents a half step: a gesture only. Either we're going to demand as a group that pilots take more responsibility for protecting those souls who will risk their lives to find them by installing reliable, useful devices, or we should leave such decisions entirly up to the pilot. Region 4 South has decided that regulation is warranted. Now they should follow through... or back off. Please, no half steps. OC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Region 4 S: ELT Mandatory | Chris OCallaghan | Soaring | 4 | June 19th 04 11:40 PM |
Perry, Region 5 - April 19-24 Cruise the grid in style | John Seaborn | Soaring | 0 | April 2nd 04 07:54 PM |
Region 9 - Parowan Utah | Dirk Elber | Soaring | 0 | February 9th 04 12:54 AM |
2004 Region 3 Contest - Dansville, New York | Region 3 Contest | Soaring | 0 | January 5th 04 01:07 PM |
Info and Links for WX in the Russian Far East Region | Frode Berg | Piloting | 4 | July 22nd 03 09:52 PM |