If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Mxsmanic , IFR sensations, and some other stuff
Dudley Henriques formulated the question :
I for one don't want to see this forum die out from becoming nothing more than an exchange of venom from angry people. What I'm saying here gang is that I for one have decided that unless someone posts something disrespectful to me personally, I intend to give people a decent shot...and yes, that goes for Mxsmanic and any other simulator pilot who shows up here with a respectful on topic post. tThat pretty well sums it all. No one can keep adults from acting like children but why not do that some place else? There is important things to do here and people's lives are at stake. just my 2cents. :-( |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Mxsmanic , IFR sensations, and some other stuff
A Lieberman wrote:
On May 18, 10:13 pm, Dudley Henriques wrote: I know a little :-) Studied Kodokan Judo at the Kodokan. Rose to Nidan. Favorite throw was Uchimata both sides. Lousy on the mat. I was fast as hell in standing Randori an managed not to end up down there very often. Sensi was Takihito Ishikawa. Dabbled in Tai Chai Chuan and Kung Fu. Just enough to get me out of street trouble growing up in inner city is all I wanted :-) What impressed me about those skills is not the physical part but the mental part and carrying them over to our everyday living part of this being acutely what you sense or feel.. So, I try to carry the mental skills to my flying and be acutely aware of my senses which based on yours and Roberts responses may be my downfall :-) I didn't mean to sound overly critical. It would be my wish that you would possibly consider some residual reading on the extremely important issue of physical sensation and IFR flight. It's never too late to alter one's approach on something this critical. Believe me, the best thing you'll ever do as a pilot is seek out and actively encourage unmercifully truthful opinion on your performance. I've been involved at times professionally and always as a friend with the Air Force Thunderbirds and Navy Blue Angels for decades. I have many friends who flew on various teams. I've sat in on their post flight debriefs where they openly review each show. At these sessions the rank comes off and nothing exists but what was right and what was wrong. I've based my own aviation career on this same philosophy. I've sought out and considered the opinions of my peers and discussed openly with them what they have observed of my performance. It's just too important for anything else. I learn every day. You will as well. We're both better pilots for this. -- Dudley Henriques |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Mxsmanic , IFR sensations, and some other stuff
A Lieberman brought next idea :
I absolutely agree based on time and time again history, that any feelings in the head absolutely has to be ignored, instruments are there for that, but for verification of power adjustments, I see no reason why AS A TOOL, the feeling in your rear end cannot be used as a verification of the reaction of your actioin (adding or reducing power). The problem with feelings is that no two sets of feelers feel with the same feeling. lol Then there are the sets of feelings that are felt that are not consciously felt in terms of being able to explain them. The discussion can be both descriptive and indescriptive unless it is abouit what actions can or cannot be applied to your sets of feelings. Why do I feel like singing out loud with Barbra Streisand? |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Mxsmanic , IFR sensations, and some other stuff
Dudley Henriques brought next idea :
I just want to make it absolutely clear that in my opinion, the ONLY relationship between physical sensation and IFR is in understanding how physical sensations can harm you and how to deal with them by instrument referencing all the way through the scan down to primary panel. I would NEVER attempt to verify an instrument reading by referencing a physical sensation. In ANY situation where an instrument reading was suspect, I would immediately extend my primary scan to include peripheral instruments to verify the quality of the data that was suspect. Under NO circumstance, would I EVER allow the time line necessary to include a physical sensation in this equation. To do so in my opinion is dangerous not only in a possible erroneous attitude input, but as well extends the time line to a recovery input. Being primarily creatures earthbound (land underfoot), where feelings are our primary sources of instrument accuracy (speed in a car, wind in our hair), its kewl to trust those sensory inputs. A lot of day-in/day-out experiences too. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Mxsmanic , IFR sensations, and some other stuff
Buster Hymen submitted this idea :
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in news:e1a5b2c5-9592-4e83- : When I was a kid, I was spun to dizzy, and then staggered when I tried to walk. You still haven't recovered. In the spirit of this thread, adios asshole. PLONKIE :-@ |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Mxsmanic , IFR sensations, and some other stuff
"Gezellig" wrote ... Why do I feel like singing out loud with Barbra Streisand? That could be considered Medically disqualifying !!! ;-) |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Mxsmanic , IFR sensations, and some other stuff
On May 18, 10:40*pm, Dudley Henriques wrote:
I didn't mean to sound overly critical. It would be my wish that you would possibly consider some residual reading on the extremely important issue of physical sensation and IFR flight. It's never too late to alter one's approach on something this critical. You are right, and I fully understand you and Robert about ignoring leans and other erroneous UNSOLICITED feelings incurred in flight and one MUST TRUST THE INSTRUMENTS when that happens. I am more talking about expected feelings resulting from my input of power ONLY. Yanks and banks as stated earlier as one cannot do this without instruments in IMC and every text book covers this well... I am the first one to acknowledge the problem is there with the inner ear stuff, and have actively taking up VFR and instrument students inside IMC so they can see it will kill them if they don't respect it. Their reactions have been priceless and equally the same, they (VFR pilots) won't touch a cloud. Drifting a little here, the biggest flaw which fortunately did not happen to me is that I am seeing way too many instrument pilots getting their IA rating without touching a cloud in conducting approaches. That bothers me the most. My instructor had me go down to ILS minimums so when I did my first solo instrument flight with 1000 foot ceilings, it really was a non event. EXCITING yes! It's just too important for anything else. I learn every day. You will as well. We're both better pilots for this. And it's exchanges like this that we learn from each other :-) I been away from the student group for some time (first post I believe was in 1991 for me) because of the noise level and just thought I would pop in to see if it was reduced and it hasn't changed I see. And most importantly to me, is EVERYTIME I walk on the ramp to my plane, I am in learning / student mode. NOTHING is taken for granted by this pilot from preflight to tie down. It's only AFTER I put the plane to bed by tying it down have I stopped flying the plane. I believe most people believe they stopped flyiing the plane when they shut down the master.. I go further...... |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Mxsmanic , IFR sensations, and some other stuff
On May 18, 10:42*pm, Gezellig wrote:
A Lieberman brought next idea : The problem with feelings is that no two sets of feelers feel with the same feeling. lol Then there are the sets of feelings that are felt that are not consciously felt in terms of being able to explain them. ABSOLUTELY AGREE. And when that happens, instruments MUST be trusted. It's the absence of an EXPECTED feeling that should question the validity of instrumentation. In my case, and SUDDEN extreme pitch up displayed on my AI, I should have expected positive G's in the seat of my pants. I did not get that, therefore me flagging the AI and starting my cross check to my secondary instruments for troubleshooting. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Mxsmanic , IFR sensations, and some other stuff
I would NEVER attempt to verify an instrument reading by referencing a
physical sensation. Thank you, Dudley, for weighing in on this all-important topic. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Mxsmanic , IFR sensations, and some other stuff
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Apology re mxsmanic | terry | Piloting | 96 | February 16th 08 05:17 PM |
I saw Mxsmanic on TV | Clear Prop | Piloting | 8 | February 14th 07 01:18 AM |
Mxsmanic | gwengler | Piloting | 30 | January 11th 07 03:42 AM |
Getting rid of MXSMANIC | [email protected] | Piloting | 33 | December 8th 06 11:26 PM |
Feeling aircraft sensations | Ramapriya | Piloting | 17 | January 12th 06 10:15 AM |