If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
No
"Viperdoc" wrote in message ... So, if you have a SEL, MEL, and seaplane ratings do you have to do a BFR in three different planes? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Viperdoc wrote:
So, if you have a SEL, MEL, and seaplane ratings do you have to do a BFR in three different planes? No. Just pick one and you are good to go for all categories and classes for which you are rated. For example, you can take your BFR in a glider and be good to go in your Citation Jet or helicopter... Which is why CFIs would better off (IMHO) sending folks to the Wings program... (which still requires three hours of recurrent training that said CFI can provide, but without the same liability exposure...) --Sylvain |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
You do not need a tailwheel signoff for FAA purposes. You are already
rated in catagory and class for single engine land then you are "rated" in a tailwheel, because tailwheel is just a logbook endorsement. However, if the training does not end in a tailwheel endorsement, then I think an instructor would have a problem signing off on your flight review. Part of a flight review is to be able to land and take off safely. I wouldn't sign off a flight review if the training was in a taildragger unless the pilot had a taildragger endorsement. The tailwheel training to get a tailwheel signoff could be used for the 1 hour requirement of flight training required for a flight review. You wouldn't need an additional hour of "flight review training". At least not if you trained with me. Taildragger endorsements take all sorts of different number of hours. The difficulty is crosswind landings. You need the wind, and you need to demostrate you can land in it. So strickly speaking, for satisfying FAA requirements, yes, you can do your flight review training in a taildragger if you don't have a tailwheel signoff. But practical matters dictate that you are going to need it. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Actually, the Part 61 FAQ in the FAA's library specificly REQUIRES the
CFI to have a tailwheel endorsement when providing a flight review in a tailwheel aircraft. (essentially this falls under the "authorized instructor" clause, and to be authorized to instruct in a tailwheel, one must be endorsed, in their view). Granted, the FAQ's are pretty far down the list in the scheme of things with regards to the regulatory heirarchy, but it's the "party line". By the way, in my situation, I did about 8 hours total in the tailwheel, to the point I could manage wheel landings, 3 pointers and xwinds with both. This was over 2 days, and combined with some spectacular mountain area flying in the Salt Lake area. My friend/instructor was not sure if a BFR in a plane I was not endorsed in would pass the "smell test" if it were ever auditied, so we hammered things out to the point he felt I was endorseable for PIC tailwheel. Combined with about 3-4 hours of tailwheel dabbling over the past 4-5 years, I made the transition fairly well, given that the 180 was characterized as a little more difficult than an ordinary entry level tailwheel. Thanks for the replies and opinions with regards to the ratings issue, even though at this point it's purely an academic exercise with regard to me. Dave George Patterson wrote: Dave S wrote: The regs say you must take the flight review in an aircraft that one is "rated" for. Does rated apply to "category and class" or is there also the need to meet tailwheel, complex or high performance as well (when applicable)? You need to be rated in category and class. Keep in mind, though, that somebody needs to be acting PIC. If you don't have the tailwheel signoff, the CFI has to have it. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:09:31 GMT, Dave S
wrote: Pinging the group for an answer here. Scenario: Up for flight review, elect to have instruction in a taildragger for the purpose of the flight review. Have a PP-ASEL, but do NOT have a one time endorsement in tailwheel aircraft that permits one to be PIC. What about if you used the taildragger endorsement as part of a Wings phase? A safety seminar and some dual for which you get a nice certificate and pin and you don't have to bother with a flight review. Would that work? I think you' re supposed to get a variety of instruction, including some instrument work, to satisfy Wings, but I expect that the taildragger work ought to satisfy most of them. RK Henry |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Viperdoc" wrote in message ... So, if you have a SEL, MEL, and seaplane ratings do you have to do a BFR in three different planes? No and for that matter, and I think this is insane, when I got my R-H certificate that acted as my BFR for ASEL which at the time I hadn't been in the cockpit of one for 5 years. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave S" wrote in message nk.net... Actually, the Part 61 FAQ in the FAA's library specificly REQUIRES the CFI to have a tailwheel endorsement when providing a flight review in a tailwheel aircraft. (essentially this falls under the "authorized instructor" clause, and to be authorized to instruct in a tailwheel, one must be endorsed, in their view). Does it say they need the endorsement even if they are grandfathered in (pre what...'93?)??? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Yes that will satisfy the BFR, but he has to get his plane to the Wings
event. and you are assuming that there will be an instructor there that is both qualified and willing to do this. Maybe have a tailwheel endorsed pilot friend fly him there? I dunno, sounds like a whole lot of trouble just to save a couple of hours in the plane. Just get your BFR done in whatever you are currently qualified to fly, and get the tailwheel endorsement seperately. "RK Henry" wrote in message ... On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:09:31 GMT, Dave S wrote: Pinging the group for an answer here. Scenario: Up for flight review, elect to have instruction in a taildragger for the purpose of the flight review. Have a PP-ASEL, but do NOT have a one time endorsement in tailwheel aircraft that permits one to be PIC. What about if you used the taildragger endorsement as part of a Wings phase? A safety seminar and some dual for which you get a nice certificate and pin and you don't have to bother with a flight review. Would that work? I think you' re supposed to get a variety of instruction, including some instrument work, to satisfy Wings, but I expect that the taildragger work ought to satisfy most of them. RK Henry |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Dave S wrote:
The regs say you must take the flight review in an aircraft that one is "rated" for. Does rated apply to "category and class" or is there also the need to meet tailwheel, complex or high performance as well (when applicable)? Ratings are the things that appear on your pilot certificate. Category, class, and for things that require it a type rating (jets and other large aircraft). Tailwheel, complex, or HP do not count. They aren't ratings. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
George Patterson wrote:
You need to be rated in category and class. Keep in mind, though, that somebody needs to be acting PIC. If you don't have the tailwheel signoff, the CFI has to have it. Of course, if your BFR has expired, you can't be PIC during the review anyhow... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airports Rated Critical Unsatisfactory: Given Black Star Rating | Michael Ravnitzky | Piloting | 0 | February 3rd 05 03:34 AM |
Define penetration. | Bruce Greeff | Soaring | 27 | February 7th 04 03:41 PM |
Aerobatic Rated? | c hinds | Soaring | 0 | December 17th 03 05:15 PM |
Aircraft engine certification FAR's | Corky Scott | Home Built | 4 | July 25th 03 06:46 PM |
Enlisted pilots | John Randolph | Naval Aviation | 41 | July 21st 03 02:11 PM |