A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New Word 'SOARING'



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old February 2nd 05, 10:25 PM
Jim Kellett
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ray Lovinggood" wrote in message
...

I just received my Feb 2005 issue of 'SOARING' today
and noticed a new word I'll have to add to my vocabulary.


The only quote worth repeating form the inimitable Marion Barry, former and
now again elected official of the District of Columbia, was a remark once
made to a reporter querying him about being caught in a drug bust . . .he
said:

"Get Over It".

big grin

Why Worry About Grammar??? (Read the Following Quickly .)

I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The
phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde
Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer inwaht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the
olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit
pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a
porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by
istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? Yaeh,and I awlyas thought
slpeling was ipmorantt.

-Jim Kellett,Resident Curmudgeon


  #12  
Old February 2nd 05, 10:48 PM
Shawn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim Kellett wrote:
"Ray Lovinggood" wrote in message
...


I just received my Feb 2005 issue of 'SOARING' today
and noticed a new word I'll have to add to my vocabulary.



The only quote worth repeating form the inimitable Marion Barry, former and
now again elected official of the District of Columbia, was a remark once
made to a reporter querying him about being caught in a drug bust . . .he
said:

"Get Over It".

big grin

Why Worry About Grammar??? (Read the Following Quickly .)

I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The
phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde
Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer inwaht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the
olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit
pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a
porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by
istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? Yaeh,and I awlyas thought
slpeling was ipmorantt.


Tell my fifth grade English teacher it isn't important. Scariest woman
I ever knew.

Shawn
  #13  
Old February 3rd 05, 12:11 AM
Mitch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Shawn wrote:
Jim Kellett wrote:
"Ray Lovinggood" wrote in

message
...


I just received my Feb 2005 issue of 'SOARING' today
and noticed a new word I'll have to add to my vocabulary.



The only quote worth repeating form the inimitable Marion Barry,

former and
now again elected official of the District of Columbia, was a

remark once
made to a reporter querying him about being caught in a drug bust .

.. .he
said:

"Get Over It".

big grin

Why Worry About Grammar??? (Read the Following Quickly .)

I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was

rdanieg. The
phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at

Cmabrigde
Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer inwaht oredr the ltteers in a wrod

are, the
olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the

rghit
pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it

wouthit a
porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter

by
istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? Yaeh,and I awlyas

thought
slpeling was ipmorantt.


Tell my fifth grade English teacher it isn't important. Scariest

woman
I ever knew.

Shawn


The full article will be available on the website www.abqsoaring.org
within the next couple of days. For those of you who have read the
article, the tutorial on how to submit to the OLC also resides on the
same page. (Reference to it in the mag, but no link)
-Mitch
P.S. Not criticizing, just trying to get the full information out
there for what I feel is an important article that people would be
extremely interested to read!

  #14  
Old February 3rd 05, 12:34 AM
Jim Skydell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

dianne wrote:

Jim:
You forgot to tell them that they obviously have not volunteered to
help out. Its a very small group doing everything that needs doing and
volunteerism is the buzz word this year. If you don't like the
pictures, send some new ones; if you don't like the editing, become a
contributing editor. Stop whining and pitch in and help.


Dianne, Mr. Vorsanger is already helping us, and I am grateful for it.
He worked very hard at the AOPA convention this year, staffing the SSA
booth. He is also one of our 80 or so convention volunteers. I took his
comment in jest, as I did Ray's.

As far as some of the other folks posting here, I doubt Denise would
want their help. That's why I didn't ask.

Jim
  #15  
Old February 3rd 05, 03:17 AM
Jim Vincent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I saw the typo on boyfriend (buyfriend) and was amused. Soaring is essentially
a home grown magazine that does a great job considering the resources it has.
I suppose we could add another editor, but that would increase our dues. I'd
rather keep the occasional typo. Good thing it was not bi-friend.

What I don't get is the Too Late To Classify section. How come there are
always repeat ads in there? Also, how can anyone write an article about
actually enjoying a flight in a 2-33? I thought the mantra was glass, glass,
glass.

Jim Vincent
N483SZ
illspam
  #16  
Old February 3rd 05, 04:01 AM
Tony Verhulst
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Why Worry About Grammar??? (Read the Following Quickly .)

I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg.


Tell my fifth grade English teacher it isn't important. Scariest woman
I ever knew.


Mrs Hall went to visit an author friend in the hospital. He was
complaining about a miss-spelled word in a magazine article he wrote.
Mrs Hall said "what's the big deal?. The author replied "mrs Hell, it
makes a hall of a difference". Miss-spelled words in a magazine may not
be important, but it is sloppy, IMHO.

Tony V.
  #17  
Old February 3rd 05, 04:21 AM
F.L. Whiteley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tony Verhulst" wrote in message
...

Why Worry About Grammar??? (Read the Following Quickly .)

I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg.


Tell my fifth grade English teacher it isn't important. Scariest woman
I ever knew.


Mrs Hall went to visit an author friend in the hospital. He was
complaining about a miss-spelled word in a magazine article he wrote.
Mrs Hall said "what's the big deal?. The author replied "mrs Hell, it
makes a hall of a difference". Miss-spelled words in a magazine may not
be important, but it is sloppy, IMHO.

Tony V.

Of course, application spell checkers lead to all sorts of grammatical and
spelling errors these days. My home town paper has more than it's share.
AP has more than a few also.

Frank Whiteley


  #18  
Old February 3rd 05, 05:24 AM
Bruce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well put Jim

If something bothers you - do something constructive about it.

Constructive things include anything that makes gathering, editing and producing
the content easier. By far the biggest job in terms of time and frustration
appears to be getting people to contribute material. Stories, photos and ideas.
You don't have to be able to produce a professional quality document - that's
the editor's job. Conversely, the likelihood of the editor having your
experience in soaring is small.

My wife is a freelance industrial editor - producing what she refers to as
"mortal prose" . In house magazines pretty similar to Soaring. So I have some
appreciation for how hard it is to produce something like this.

If you make the job easier, the value / quality of what you get will improve.
Don't like seeing old pictures? - Contribute some new ones.

Just my 2c worth. (unlike Jim, not so respectful - there are too many whiners
out there...)



Jim Skydell wrote:
Gentlemen:

You are all making reference in your comments regarding SOARING
magazine, in one way or the other, to "The SSA."

I'd respectfully point out to you all that "The SSA" does not produce a
magazine. People, in this case Denise Layton, (managing editor), Steve
Hines (art director) and a volunteer staff of your peers (contributing
editors) produce the magazine. And being people, they have the same
feelings you all (presumably) do. They surely take Ray's "buyfriend"
comment in jest. Others they surely do not.

It's very easy to be critical of "The SSA," or "SOARING magazine"
because they have no voices, and cannot respond. Nor can they afford
you some insight into exactly what it's like putting out five issues of
the magazine, and at least one issue of Technical Soaring at the same
time as planning and executing a national convention, to say nothing of
running a 12,600 member organization (all for your benefit).

"The SSA" and "SOARING magazine" have no voices, but I do. And again,
respectfully, I know what I am talking about. I have spent at least 60
hour weeks for over a year as a volunteer for the SSA, serving on the
Board, ExComm, and creating a convention that I hope each of you will
attend and enjoy.

In so doing, I have worked closely with all of the Hobbs staff. In
particular, I helped Denise Layton create the convention program, which
is nearly as large as an issue of SOARING magazine. Denise did this at
the same time she put out 5 issues of SOARING, and at least one issue of
Technical Soaring. And Steve Hines has been very helpful with graphic
design for the convention. He was busy creating those five SOARING
issues, while Denise did the program herself.

Just how hard does this woman work for "The SSA?" She will be angry
with me for sharing this, but I think it's high time "The SSA" had a
voice, and you started to listen to it:

"At this point I barely remember my own name, and I now have bigger and
better problems then that. Problems with the March magazine. I have not
had a single day off (including weekends) since Christmas, have only
gone to lunch maybe three times in the last three weeks, and killed
myself working on the convention and the magazine. I have come in early
every morning, left late every night. I can't take the nastiness on RAS
any more."

Is SOARING magazine perfect? Far from it. Is it significantly better in
recent times? I, for one, think so. And everyone involved is working
hard to make it better, all the time. While there is some significant
confusion about exactly who might be responsible for those missing
captions in Mr. Rezor's article, in the future, please do your best to
"go easy" on people when mistakes are made. These people can only do 4
or 5 things at once, and ultimately, everything they do (imperfect as
they may be) is for you.

I hope all of you will attend the convention.

Jim Skydell Region 12

  #19  
Old February 3rd 05, 01:47 PM
Pat Russell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My home town paper has more than it's share.

Its a shame.

Personally, I rely on the spell-checker to keep me safe from
special disorientation.

-Pat
  #20  
Old February 3rd 05, 02:02 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Jim Vincent wrote:
I saw the typo on boyfriend (buyfriend) and was amused. Soaring is

essentially
a home grown magazine that does a great job considering the resources

it has.
I suppose we could add another editor, but that would increase our

dues. I'd
rather keep the occasional typo. Good thing it was not bi-friend.

What I don't get is the Too Late To Classify section. How come there

are
always repeat ads in there? Also, how can anyone write an article

about
actually enjoying a flight in a 2-33? I thought the mantra was

glass, glass,
glass.

Jim Vincent
N483SZ
illspam


Hey Jim- You are sounding like an elitist snob. You fly in an older,
well established, and relatively wealthy club. Many others, likely the
majority, don't. Lots of people do enjoy flying 2-33's or 1-26's or
whatever.
The mantra should be to enjoy whatever you fly and encourage the other
person to do the same. It does not matter what you fly, but rather that
you fly.
UH

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"SOARING" possibly in legal jeoprady Bob Thompson Soaring 18 February 6th 06 06:06 PM
Soaring Seminar - March 19th - ChicagoLand Glider Council ContestID67 Soaring 4 January 6th 05 11:28 PM
Possible future legal problems with "SOARING" Bob Thompson Soaring 3 September 26th 04 11:48 AM
World Champion Soaring Pilot To Speak at Sky Soaring John DeRosa Sky Soaring Chicago IL Soaring 0 May 14th 04 09:02 PM
January/February 2004 issue of Southern California Soaring is on-line [email protected] Soaring 8 January 4th 04 09:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.