A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

500 km Triangle at 306 km/hr in Argentina



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 23rd 06, 02:57 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Paul Remde
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,691
Default 500 km Triangle at 306 km/hr in Argentina

I just received an e-mail from Argentina that contained the text below.

"Today, Dec 22nd 2006 at 1:00 AM UTC, Klaus Ohlmann called me on the phone
just after landing to let me know he have made a 500 Km flight at 306 km/h
on average in a Nimbus 4DM... this could be the first above 300 km/h and for
far, the fastest glider flight made under FAI rules."

306 km/hr = 190 mph = 165 knots

That is an amazing feat!

Congratulations Mr. Ohlmann!!!

Merry Christmas,

Paul Remde


  #2  
Old December 23rd 06, 04:54 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 351
Default 500 km Triangle at 306 km/hr in Argentina

that is simply amazing.

ive spent about 1000 hours going slower than that with an ENGINE.

Paul Remde wrote:
I just received an e-mail from Argentina that contained the text below.

"Today, Dec 22nd 2006 at 1:00 AM UTC, Klaus Ohlmann called me on the phone
just after landing to let me know he have made a 500 Km flight at 306 km/h
on average in a Nimbus 4DM... this could be the first above 300 km/h and for
far, the fastest glider flight made under FAI rules."

306 km/hr = 190 mph = 165 knots

That is an amazing feat!

Congratulations Mr. Ohlmann!!!

Merry Christmas,

Paul Remde


  #3  
Old December 23rd 06, 05:30 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 80
Default 500 km Triangle at 306 km/hr in Argentina

Not bad for a glider with a VNE of 275 km/hr.

On Dec 22, 6:57 pm, "Paul Remde" wrote:
I just received an e-mail from Argentina that contained the text below.

"Today, Dec 22nd 2006 at 1:00 AM UTC, Klaus Ohlmann called me on the phone
just after landing to let me know he have made a 500 Km flight at 306 km/h
on average in a Nimbus 4DM... this could be the first above 300 km/h and for
far, the fastest glider flight made under FAI rules."

306 km/hr = 190 mph = 165 knots

That is an amazing feat!

Congratulations Mr. Ohlmann!!!

Merry Christmas,

Paul Remde


  #4  
Old December 23rd 06, 05:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
JS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,384
Default 500 km Triangle at 306 km/hr in Argentina



306 km/hr = 190 mph = 165 knots

That is an amazing feat!


Yes, it is.
Anyone trying to beat that record should be certain their parachute is
in good shape, as the number of wings will likely total zero.
Jim

  #5  
Old December 24th 06, 03:54 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
P. Corbett
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 32
Default 500 km Triangle at 306 km/hr in Argentina

JS wrote:

306 km/hr = 190 mph = 165 knots

That is an amazing feat!


Yes, it is.
Anyone trying to beat that record should be certain their parachute is
in good shape, as the number of wings will likely total zero.
Jim

I am sending Klaus the $0.50 in the Berle trophy!!

(Sorry...a private Tehachapi Soaring joke)

Paul
ZZ
  #6  
Old December 23rd 06, 06:54 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Soarin Again
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14
Default 500 km Triangle at 306 km/hr in Argentina

At 05:42 23 December 2006, Js wrote:

306 km/hr = 190 mph = 165 knots

That is an amazing feat!

Yes, it is.
Anyone trying to beat that record should be certain
their parachute is
in good shape, as the number of wings will likely total
zero.
Jim


Does anyone know if his Nimbus 4DM has had special
modifications to increase the vne at altitude, or does
he just not care about operating limitations?

Soarin


  #7  
Old December 23rd 06, 07:14 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Greg Arnold
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 251
Default 500 km Triangle at 306 km/hr in Argentina

Soarin Again wrote:
At 05:42 23 December 2006, Js wrote:
306 km/hr = 190 mph = 165 knots

That is an amazing feat!


Does anyone know if his Nimbus 4DM has had special
modifications to increase the vne at altitude, or does
he just not care about operating limitations?

Soarin



When you are cruising at 20,000' to 30,000', doesn't the effect of
altitude cause IAS to be substantially less than ground speed?

  #8  
Old December 23rd 06, 12:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 578
Default 500 km Triangle at 306 km/hr in Argentina

Greg Arnold schrieb:

When you are cruising at 20,000' to 30,000', doesn't the effect of
altitude cause IAS to be substantially less than ground speed?


Vne goes with TAS, not IAS. But then, as it most probably was a wave
flight, there most probably was a wind.
  #9  
Old December 23rd 06, 02:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Doug Haluza
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 175
Default 500 km Triangle at 306 km/hr in Argentina


Stefan wrote:
Greg Arnold schrieb:

When you are cruising at 20,000' to 30,000', doesn't the effect of
altitude cause IAS to be substantially less than ground speed?


Vne goes with TAS, not IAS. But then, as it most probably was a wave
flight, there most probably was a wind.


Yes, but in a closed course, the wind is a net loss, not a benefit.

  #10  
Old December 23rd 06, 03:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bruce Greef
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 62
Default 500 km Triangle at 306 km/hr in Argentina

Doug Haluza wrote:
Stefan wrote:

Greg Arnold schrieb:


When you are cruising at 20,000' to 30,000', doesn't the effect of
altitude cause IAS to be substantially less than ground speed?


Vne goes with TAS, not IAS. But then, as it most probably was a wave
flight, there most probably was a wind.



Yes, but in a closed course, the wind is a net loss, not a benefit.

That all depends on the profile of the wind. Different speed and direction at
different altitudes can no doubt be a benefit.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question, Diamond distance as unsuccessful triangle. Roger Aviation Marketplace 1 November 22nd 04 07:34 PM
Question, Diamond distance as unsuccessful triangle. Roger Soaring 1 May 13th 04 01:31 AM
Argentina ! Frank Noort Military Aviation 0 January 27th 04 09:47 PM
Flying in Argentina Jay Soaring 1 November 25th 03 04:52 AM
new records (Out&Return) for Delore-Fossett in Argentina cernauta Soaring 0 November 17th 03 02:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.