If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
Scary story about landing on a Lake Tahoe golf course
re https://youtu.be/BBpqvPujZgM In my opinion, this video shows the difference in training between a power pilot and a glider pilot. A glider pilot in a similar situation (eg being low and not finding lift) would have remained close to one of the excellent large grass fields immediately visible in the video. A glider pilot would not have attempted to continue further without keeping another good field within reach. Once close to a airport, a glider pilot would not have attempted to fly a normal pattern, once a runway could be reached with an early turn in. A glider pilot would not have chosen to extend his downwind, for no obvious purpose, to place a highway between him and the runway. To summarize: a glider pilot would have calmly landed in a large grass field, and would not have made a panicky gear-up landing in a crop field. |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Scary story about landing on a Lake Tahoe golf course
On Monday, August 3, 2020 at 12:02:38 AM UTC-4, wrote:
re https://youtu.be/BBpqvPujZgM In my opinion, this video shows the difference in training between a power pilot and a glider pilot. A glider pilot in a similar situation (eg being low and not finding lift) would have remained close to one of the excellent large grass fields immediately visible in the video. A glider pilot would not have attempted to continue further without keeping another good field within reach. Once close to a airport, a glider pilot would not have attempted to fly a normal pattern, once a runway could be reached with an early turn in. A glider pilot would not have chosen to extend his downwind, for no obvious purpose, to place a highway between him and the runway. To summarize: a glider pilot would have calmly landed in a large grass field, and would not have made a panicky gear-up landing in a crop field. With the engine only partly running, how long will it take the P-51 to lower the landing gear? How long to lower the landing gear manually? |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
Scary story about landing on a Lake Tahoe golf course
On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 13:40:28 -0700, Eric Greenwell
wrote: The tighter turn works for gliders after a rope break, so I'm thinking (as did Paul B), it would work for the P51 pilot. There is an optimum bank for minimizing the loss of altitude (and he did have some altitude). Had he turned tighter (about 40 degrees typically), he would have made it further around the turn than making a wide turn. Yes, initially he would be a bit lower, but his greater turn rate would more than compensates for that, and he can get back some of the that altitude when he stops turning and slows down. Hi Eric, From the video one can clearly see that his energy is barely enough to cross the extended center line, including the flare. Definitely not enough energy to make a turn, not to mention to drop the gear. Let's do some maths: When he started the turn to base leg he was between 250 and 350 ft AGL (depending on his altimeter settings) and 150 mph. P-51D stall speed clean: 100 mph, hence stall speed at 40 degreed bank: 114 mph . So, if he had flown a perfect approach at 120 MPH and 40 degrees of bank, he would have had a turn diameter of 2305 ft, resulting in a flight path distance of 3620 ft. Having an altitude of 350 ft AGL, this would have needed an L/D of 10.3, with 250 ft he would have needed 14.5. At 175 mph the L/D of the P-51D is 15:1, prop in high pitch. Close to the stall speed L/D is an estimated 30 percent less, hence 10:1. Propellor in low pitch will further reduce this number. I found no numbers on the influence of open cooling flaps. Let's assume an L/D of 10:1 for now (from the video probably a lot lower). Hence, the pilot might have had the chance to complete his turn if all his factors had been in his favour, but even under these circulstances he would not have had the energy to extend the gear. He didn't have the altitude to extend it over the runway after the turn, and extending it during the turn would have affected his L/D so much that a crash was unavoidable. If he had run out of energy (altitude and/or speed) in the last phase of the turn, he would have definitely crashed, directly in front of him the M-11 motorway, his flightpath still pointing at the thousands of spectators. Hardly survivable. Conclusion: This landing is a perfect example of getting one's priorities right: Fly the plane to a safe controlled landing instead of trying to get back to the airfield, risking a probably deadly crash if only the slightest thing goes wrong. Cheers Andreas |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
Scary story about landing on a Lake Tahoe golf course
On Sun, 02 Aug 2020 03:39:34 -0700, Paul B wrote:
Great video, there are couple of questions I would ask though. 1) Why did he not turn much tighter to return to the airfield, one looses much less height in a tight turn that a shallow one? From a tight turn he might have been able to land downwind. Of course I do not know what the winds were, or how feasible is to land P-51 downwind. 2) Why did he cross the highway, surely he could have turned base halfway down the strip and have enough runway to stop. I thought I'd posted this a day ago, but it evidently didn't make it to the newsgroup somehow. I've been to airshows at Duxford, flown gliders past it, flown from there in a Tiger Moth, and driven past it on the M.11 many times, so I have some small knowledge of the area. Here's my take: The formation was joining up on the far side of the motorway when the P-51s engine had its tizzy. Look at a map or a satpic of the airfield - the M.11 is almost glued to the east (departure) end of the runway. When that part of the M.11 was built they chopped 1200ft off the Eastern end of the runway to keep the road straight. From the vid it looks as though the formation was joining up a bit North of the centre line, possibly somewhere near Wittlesford, so when the engine hiccuped the second time, setting up a left-hand circuit on the north of the airfield must have looked good. The south side has no obstacles but (a) it makes the circuit quite a bit longer and (b) it would have meant crossing the departure end of an active runway. Turning in early: that would have meant crossing a row of large hangars and the airshow spectators, which were all along the northern side of the airfield. In the UK at least, the rules are clear: you DO NOT overfly a crowd of people below 1000ft AGL under any circumstances - and the P-51 was below that with a dead engine by the time he was past the M.11. As I said: bring up Duxford Airfield on Google Earth or Google Maps, compare that with the video shot from the P-51 and draw your own conclusions. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Scary story about landing on a Lake Tahoe golf course
On Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:38:25 PM UTC-7, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Sun, 02 Aug 2020 03:39:34 -0700, Paul B wrote: Great video, there are couple of questions I would ask though. 1) Why did he not turn much tighter to return to the airfield, one looses much less height in a tight turn that a shallow one? From a tight turn he might have been able to land downwind. Of course I do not know what the winds were, or how feasible is to land P-51 downwind. 2) Why did he cross the highway, surely he could have turned base halfway down the strip and have enough runway to stop. I thought I'd posted this a day ago, but it evidently didn't make it to the newsgroup somehow. I've been to airshows at Duxford, flown gliders past it, flown from there in a Tiger Moth, and driven past it on the M.11 many times, so I have some small knowledge of the area. Here's my take: The formation was joining up on the far side of the motorway when the P-51s engine had its tizzy. Look at a map or a satpic of the airfield - the M.11 is almost glued to the east (departure) end of the runway. When that part of the M.11 was built they chopped 1200ft off the Eastern end of the runway to keep the road straight. From the vid it looks as though the formation was joining up a bit North of the centre line, possibly somewhere near Wittlesford, so when the engine hiccuped the second time, setting up a left-hand circuit on the north of the airfield must have looked good. The south side has no obstacles but (a) it makes the circuit quite a bit longer and (b) it would have meant crossing the departure end of an active runway. Turning in early: that would have meant crossing a row of large hangars and the airshow spectators, which were all along the northern side of the airfield. In the UK at least, the rules are clear: you DO NOT overfly a crowd of people below 1000ft AGL under any circumstances - and the P-51 was below that with a dead engine by the time he was past the M.11. As I said: bring up Duxford Airfield on Google Earth or Google Maps, compare that with the video shot from the P-51 and draw your own conclusions. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org What does a P51 have to do with soaring? There are other newsgroups that deal with warbirds. |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
Scary story about landing on a Lake Tahoe golf course
On Monday, August 3, 2020 at 8:54:22 PM UTC-5, 2G wrote:
On Monday, August 3, 2020 at 6:38:25 PM UTC-7, Martin Gregorie wrote: On Sun, 02 Aug 2020 03:39:34 -0700, Paul B wrote: Great video, there are couple of questions I would ask though. 1) Why did he not turn much tighter to return to the airfield, one looses much less height in a tight turn that a shallow one? From a tight turn he might have been able to land downwind. Of course I do not know what the winds were, or how feasible is to land P-51 downwind. 2) Why did he cross the highway, surely he could have turned base halfway down the strip and have enough runway to stop. I thought I'd posted this a day ago, but it evidently didn't make it to the newsgroup somehow. I've been to airshows at Duxford, flown gliders past it, flown from there in a Tiger Moth, and driven past it on the M.11 many times, so I have some small knowledge of the area. Here's my take: The formation was joining up on the far side of the motorway when the P-51s engine had its tizzy. Look at a map or a satpic of the airfield - the M.11 is almost glued to the east (departure) end of the runway. When that part of the M.11 was built they chopped 1200ft off the Eastern end of the runway to keep the road straight. From the vid it looks as though the formation was joining up a bit North of the centre line, possibly somewhere near Wittlesford, so when the engine hiccuped the second time, setting up a left-hand circuit on the north of the airfield must have looked good. The south side has no obstacles but (a) it makes the circuit quite a bit longer and (b) it would have meant crossing the departure end of an active runway. Turning in early: that would have meant crossing a row of large hangars and the airshow spectators, which were all along the northern side of the airfield. In the UK at least, the rules are clear: you DO NOT overfly a crowd of people below 1000ft AGL under any circumstances - and the P-51 was below that with a dead engine by the time he was past the M.11. As I said: bring up Duxford Airfield on Google Earth or Google Maps, compare that with the video shot from the P-51 and draw your own conclusions. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org What does a P51 have to do with soaring? There are other newsgroups that deal with warbirds. O.P. of the P51 video clearly stated this might be useful to Tow Pilots "power loss in a tug" Also, I understand sometimes gliders are equipped with engines, which sometimes fail. I found the video useful as a cautionary tale of procedures and pilot responses to a rapidly deteriorating flight event. I know that I will not live or fly long enough to learn these lessons on my own. I'm happy to learn from pilots regardless of what they may have been flying.. Thanks to all the Tow Pilots and their contribution to Soaring. Respect, Scott |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
Scary story about landing on a Lake Tahoe golf course
"Conclusion:
This landing is a perfect example of getting one's priorities right" Yes, but only in the last 5 seconds of the flight. Right before he aborted the left hand turn, he was going to land on the strip. That was his plan. My point is that he should have turned before he reached the freeway. Not necessarily when it was all happening, I am aware of the pressure that he was under. However he clearly was desperate to make the runway and that mistake, to me, was a teaching moment. He did allude to the fact that a disabled aircraft is simply a tool dissipate energy, but did not discussed the fact that he was trying to reach the runway when he should not have. Also, Martin G, from the video and the topology, his downwind was to the south of the airfield, flying West to East (approx), otherwise a left hand turn could not take him across the freeway. And as you have noted there are no obstacles or crowds on that side. So he had choices. To reiterate, I am NOT discussing his performance during the event. I know nothing about flying P-51 etc. I am only discussing the debrief. Cheers Paul On Tuesday, 4 August 2020 10:34:35 UTC+10, Andreas Maurer wrote: On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 13:40:28 -0700, Eric Greenwell wrote: The tighter turn works for gliders after a rope break, so I'm thinking (as did Paul B), it would work for the P51 pilot. There is an optimum bank for minimizing the loss of altitude (and he did have some altitude). Had he turned tighter (about 40 degrees typically), he would have made it further around the turn than making a wide turn. Yes, initially he would be a bit lower, but his greater turn rate would more than compensates for that, and he can get back some of the that altitude when he stops turning and slows down. Hi Eric, From the video one can clearly see that his energy is barely enough to cross the extended center line, including the flare. Definitely not enough energy to make a turn, not to mention to drop the gear. Let's do some maths: When he started the turn to base leg he was between 250 and 350 ft AGL (depending on his altimeter settings) and 150 mph. P-51D stall speed clean: 100 mph, hence stall speed at 40 degreed bank: 114 mph . So, if he had flown a perfect approach at 120 MPH and 40 degrees of bank, he would have had a turn diameter of 2305 ft, resulting in a flight path distance of 3620 ft. Having an altitude of 350 ft AGL, this would have needed an L/D of 10.3, with 250 ft he would have needed 14.5. At 175 mph the L/D of the P-51D is 15:1, prop in high pitch. Close to the stall speed L/D is an estimated 30 percent less, hence 10:1. Propellor in low pitch will further reduce this number. I found no numbers on the influence of open cooling flaps. Let's assume an L/D of 10:1 for now (from the video probably a lot lower). Hence, the pilot might have had the chance to complete his turn if all his factors had been in his favour, but even under these circulstances he would not have had the energy to extend the gear. He didn't have the altitude to extend it over the runway after the turn, and extending it during the turn would have affected his L/D so much that a crash was unavoidable. If he had run out of energy (altitude and/or speed) in the last phase of the turn, he would have definitely crashed, directly in front of him the M-11 motorway, his flightpath still pointing at the thousands of spectators. Hardly survivable. Conclusion: This landing is a perfect example of getting one's priorities right: Fly the plane to a safe controlled landing instead of trying to get back to the airfield, risking a probably deadly crash if only the slightest thing goes wrong. Cheers Andreas |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
Scary story about landing on a Lake Tahoe golf course
On Sunday, August 2, 2020 at 9:02:38 PM UTC-7, wrote:
re https://youtu.be/BBpqvPujZgM In my opinion, this video shows the difference in training between a power pilot and a glider pilot. A glider pilot in a similar situation (eg being low and not finding lift) would have remained close to one of the excellent large grass fields immediately visible in the video. A glider pilot would not have attempted to continue further without keeping another good field within reach. Once close to a airport, a glider pilot would not have attempted to fly a normal pattern, once a runway could be reached with an early turn in. A glider pilot would not have chosen to extend his downwind, for no obvious purpose, to place a highway between him and the runway. To summarize: a glider pilot would have calmly landed in a large grass field, and would not have made a panicky gear-up landing in a crop field. This discussion is useful, and should not be regarded as a criticism of the pilot. Such discussions remind me of the description of an accident enquiry, as "six people taking six months to decide what the pilot should have done in six seconds". |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
Scary story about landing on a Lake Tahoe golf course
On Mon, 03 Aug 2020 22:01:17 -0700, Paul B wrote:
Also, Martin G, from the video and the topology, his downwind was to the south of the airfield, flying West to East (approx), otherwise a left hand turn could not take him across the freeway. And as you have noted there are no obstacles or crowds on that side. So he had choices. Yes, you're right - after reviewing the start of the video a few times I now see that I was 180 out of sync. He was turning to base when he crossed the M.11, and then realised that he wasn't going to make the runway, which would have required crossing the road a second time and put it down parallel to road. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lake Elsinore, 1-26 crash landing video | David Reitter | Soaring | 2 | July 13th 12 09:33 PM |
Short field landing Lake Providence LA (0M8) with ATC COMS - Video | A Lieberma[_2_] | Owning | 0 | July 21st 09 12:06 AM |
South Lake Tahoe Class D | Ray | Piloting | 2 | May 15th 05 03:31 AM |
Lake Tahoe | Ross Richardson | Owning | 5 | March 28th 05 07:04 PM |
DONNER LAKE TAHOE 2005 TRUCKEE,CA PHOTOS | DONNER LAKE 2005 | Piloting | 3 | January 16th 05 08:06 AM |