Tempest in a teapot - IFR 'training' in-between lessons

"Roy Smith" wrote in message
...
Jeff wrote:
Watch out for those controllers, they sometimes have a tendency of doing
wierd things. I know one guy who got a non-standard hold on his
checkride

On my checkride, I had just intercepted the localizer for the ILS when
the controller cancelled my approach clearance and told me to do a 360
to allow faster traffic to pass me. Amazingly enough, as I finished my
turn and rolled out on my original heading, the CDI was just centering
and I completed the approach like nothing had happened. :-)

Sometimes it's good that wierd things happen on a checkride. The
examiner wants to see that you can roll with the punches. If ATC throws
you a curve and you handle it in stride, it make him feel good about you.

This was in VMC, right?

****, I thought I was going to be a career IFR student the way I was going, its
hard for me to actually sit down and study for the written, took me like 6
months...but I got some good training in that 6 months

Jeff

"Cecil E. Chapman" wrote:

Okay,,, Roy,,,, you and Jeff have done it now - I'm afraid of my checkride
now and will be remaining an IR student, forever.... GRIN WINK

Seriously though, thanks for the heads up. I hope to be REALLY, REALLY good
by checkride time...

--
--
Good Flights!

Cecil E. Chapman, Jr.
PP-ASEL

"We who fly do so for the love of flying.
We are alive in the air with this miracle
that lies in our hands and beneath our feet"

- Cecil Day Lewis-

Check out my personal flying adventures: www.bayareapilot.com
"Roy Smith" wrote in message
...
Jeff wrote:
Watch out for those controllers, they sometimes have a tendency of doing
wierd things. I know one guy who got a non-standard hold on his
checkride

On my checkride, I had just intercepted the localizer for the ILS when
the controller cancelled my approach clearance and told me to do a 360
to allow faster traffic to pass me. Amazingly enough, as I finished my
turn and rolled out on my original heading, the CDI was just centering
and I completed the approach like nothing had happened. :-)

Sometimes it's good that wierd things happen on a checkride. The
examiner wants to see that you can roll with the punches. If ATC throws
you a curve and you handle it in stride, it make him feel good about you.

yes, we almost always have VMC here in the Las Vegas area.


John Clonts wrote:

"Roy Smith" wrote in message
...
Jeff wrote:
Watch out for those controllers, they sometimes have a tendency of doing
wierd things. I know one guy who got a non-standard hold on his
checkride

On my checkride, I had just intercepted the localizer for the ILS when
the controller cancelled my approach clearance and told me to do a 360
to allow faster traffic to pass me. Amazingly enough, as I finished my
turn and rolled out on my original heading, the CDI was just centering
and I completed the approach like nothing had happened. :-)

Sometimes it's good that wierd things happen on a checkride. The
examiner wants to see that you can roll with the punches. If ATC throws
you a curve and you handle it in stride, it make him feel good about you.

This was in VMC, right?

"Cecil E. Chapman" wrote
In-between lessons I've been practicing approaches using my OnTop IFR
program. It seems to work, very well, in terms of getting me to recall the
procedures and frequencies by sheer repetition when it comes to my actual
lesson day.

My question though: Is such an approach (pardon the unintentional pun)
wise/useful?

Yes. Keep doing it. I recommend this to my instrument students as a
matter of course.

Michael

I used OnTop too. What I really liked about OnTop was that it modeled
turbulence quite well. (My only other datapoint was Jepp's and it was quite
unflyable). I would suggest that you fly with at least some turbulence
because it will force you to keep your scan going and I believe the PC sims
help out most in your scan.

During my checkride, I wound up having 30kts+ winds at 3000 feet so I was
glad to have practiced with turbulence in the sim.

My only gripe about OnTop is the fact that the radios don't fit with the
rest of the panel on one screen. That extra click and the way the radios
cover the CDIs is not very realistic. ASA's sims have the potential to be
really good if they just poured a little money into them. Oh well...


Marco

"Cecil E. Chapman" wrote in message
. com...
Just a question for y'all out there.

In-between lessons I've been practicing approaches using my OnTop IFR
program. It seems to work, very well, in terms of getting me to recall
the
procedures and frequencies by sheer repetition when it comes to my actual
lesson day.

My question though: Is such an approach (pardon the unintentional pun)
wise/useful? Would it be better for me to go into my actual instrument
lessons totally fresh (of course, with a look-see at the approach charts
before leaving for my lesson) without any rehearsal / practice? I should
say that I do notice a big difference (and satisfaction with) in my
performance on the lesson days where I have practiced/rehearsed the
approaches on my simple Sim on the days before my lesson.

Would be interested in hearing your input!

--
--
Good Flights!

Cecil E. Chapman, Jr.
PP-ASEL

"We who fly do so for the love of flying.
We are alive in the air with this miracle
that lies in our hands and beneath our feet"

- Cecil Day Lewis-

Check out my personal flying adventures: www.bayareapilot.com





Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com