If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Best performing Vario?
On Saturday, September 22, 2012 7:58:22 PM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote:
On Saturday, September 22, 2012 11:58:15 AM UTC-4, Craig R. wrote: In your opinion, what was the best performing vario you have ever used? Specifically, the one that got you centered in and to the top of the thermal in the least amount of time. Let's ignore products because they have the latest "bells and whistles" add ons, latest technology, sexy appearances, or best computer processor. Basic performance is the only criteria. I've heard some say the legacy Cambridge units and some say the Sage mechanical. Which unit did it for you? I loved the LNav and think it hard to beat when tuned right. I have the new ClearNav vario and it is even better. UH |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Best performing Vario?
ClearNav vario works better than 302 and much better than the V7. It's an excellent product -- I hope they are working hard to finish it.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Best performing Vario?
On Saturday, September 22, 2012 9:10:55 PM UTC-4, Steve Koerner wrote:
ClearNav vario works better than 302 and much better than the V7. It's an excellent product -- I hope they are working hard to finish it. My favorite until recently was the Westerboer VW900. Great for digging out from low. My new favorite is the CNv. Eagerly awaiting the updates for it. -- Matt |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Vario time constants
I love my Zander. How about time constants? The Zander goes
from .5 sec to 5 Seconds, I set mine to 2 seconds. The filter is for the audio which i set to to 2, in the middle. I wish i could program the audio to my own sounds though. Don Rickels in sink, Yes, Yes, Yes in climb... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Vario time constants
I love my Zander. How about time constants? The Zander goes
from .5 sec to 5 Seconds, I set mine to 2 seconds. The filter is for the audio which i set to to 2, in the middle. I wish i could program the audio to my own sounds though. Don Rickels in sink, Yes, Yes, Yes in climb... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Best performing Vario?
On Saturday, September 22, 2012 9:39:44 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Saturday, September 22, 2012 9:10:55 PM UTC-4, Steve Koerner wrote: My favorite until recently was the Westerboer VW900. Great for digging out from low. My new favorite is the CNv. Eagerly awaiting the updates for it. -- Matt Me too. Did exactly the same thing and think the VW910 was almost as good as my CNv (for vario/netto function). My old stuff is now on sale on eBay http://www.ebay.com/itm/130775771120 -Jim |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Best performing Vario?
Can anyone tell me how CN switches from Cruise to Climb with the
software available (assuming no switch installed)? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Best performing Vario?
On Sunday, September 30, 2012 9:16:24 PM UTC-4, Andrzej Kobus wrote:
Can anyone tell me how CN switches from Cruise to Climb with the software available (assuming no switch installed)? In the case of my vario, it showed up with a switch already wired in. A software update came along about the same time that enabled automatic switching at 65kts. Unfortunately you can only do one or the other right now; I couldn't find a config screen in the vario to change that. The change has to be done using their profile generator program on a PC. The switch was easy to install in the panel, but it's a pain to have to fiddle with it whenever you want to start working a thermal. 65kts is just too fast in my plane for searching for lift down low (it's about MC 1.5kts for me). This does seem to be a work in progress however. I'm hoping for a circling detector at some point. -- Matt |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Best performing Vario?
On Saturday, September 22, 2012 4:58:15 PM UTC+1, Craig R. wrote:
In your opinion, what was the best performing vario you have ever used? Specifically, the one that got you centered in and to the top of the thermal in the least amount of time. Let's ignore products because they have the latest "bells and whistles" add ons, latest technology, sexy appearances, or best computer processor. Basic performance is the only criteria. I've heard some say the legacy Cambridge units and some say the Sage mechanical. Which unit did it for you? So many of you say the Clearnav vario is fantastic. What is it about that vario that makes it better than any other? How do you recognise that it is better? Say, what is better about it than a V7? (I have an LX 7000, most high end gliders in the UK use the LX series, they are pretty good, and presumably the V7 will be the best yet). I fly a club glider with an LNav, and I love that too. Varios like the LX give you numerous settings, and I suspect that what makes a vario work well for me is the way it has been setup. Sadly I am not clever enough to know how to set it up for best results! When other people out-climb me (hopefully not too often) my first thought is never that it is the fault of the vario! I only once took off with a non-functioning vario (the LNav, water in plumbing). I thought it was odd that nothing was working, and was about to land out when I realised that the problem was the vario not the conditions! Happily I then found a good enough thermal to climb without a vario, and was able to fly back to the airfield. I understand some people are clever enough to fly cross country without a vario. Not me. The Butterfly sounds like genuine new tech - using accelerometers as well as pressure change. I can imagine that this must achieve a better result, but I cannot imagine how I would recognise that better result. How would I decide whether to spec my next glider with an LX 9000 or to save money and use a Butterfly plus Oudie? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Best performing Vario?
Another vote for the Clearnav vario. In answer to the question below, the
longer you soar, and the more different gliders (and instruments) you fly with, the easier it is to decide whether the instrument is agreeing with what you know from feel the glider is doing in the air. When you are climbing with other people real differences show up. Horizontal gusts can make a simple TE vario think the rate of climb has increased, when the glider isn't in fact climbing at that time. The Clearnav is also new tech withmultiple pressure sensors, 3-axis accelerometers, and good software to show you what the glider is doing in reality. In my biased opinion, it is far better than anything else I have flown with. The user interface is straighforward, and the advanced extra features (including IGC recorder) are well on the way. As John Cochran has pointed out, mechanical varios (however good) are antiques now - good audio for eyes out of cockpit are vital. So many of you say the Clearnav vario is fantastic. What is it about that vario that makes it better than any other? How do you recognise that it is better? The Butterfly sounds like genuine new tech - using accelerometers as well as pressure change. I can imagine that this must achieve a better result, but I cannot imagine how I would recognise that better result. How would I decide whether to spec my next glider with an LX 9000 or to save money and use a Butterfly plus Oudie? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: 57mm Cambridge Vario/FS: 80mm Cambridge Vario | ufmechanic | Soaring | 0 | March 24th 09 05:31 PM |
Martin Mars, Performing Live In Downtown Vancouver! | Zomby Woof | Aviation Photos | 3 | January 20th 08 03:10 PM |
Martin Mars, Performing Live In Downtown Vancouver! | Zomby Woof | Naval Aviation | 2 | January 11th 08 06:10 PM |
Navy Performing Well, Keeps Eye on Future Force | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | February 14th 05 10:06 PM |
AN-2 performing a loop | Maro_SK | Aerobatics | 1 | March 25th 04 08:18 PM |