A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Another Lycoming Crankshaft SB



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old July 19th 05, 06:15 PM
Jon Kraus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That bites the big one Jim... Sorry to hear that... Our IO-360-A3B6D was
rebuilt in 03/01 but doesn't match any of the serial numbers.... Praise
the Lord!! :-)

Jon Kraus
'79 Mooney 201

Jim N. wrote:
I got burned by this one- have to have the engine yanked on my Extra and
sent away for who knows how long.



  #12  
Old July 20th 05, 12:11 AM
Jim N.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Also, the Extra has an MT composite prop, which has to be pulled and
overhauled every 6 years.

I plan on having the engine pulled this coming January when it's too cold to
fly the Extra anyway, but the next question is whether to do the prop a the
same time (claimed downtime is three weeks and around $3,500) or wait until
next year when the prop is actually due. (which means another month of
downtime again)

The worst part is that the engine has been running well- it never even needs
a quart between every 25 hour oil change, the compressions are solid, and it
idles and starts well. All this is on an engine that has no air filter and
is asked to go from 2700 rpm to idle and back again many times during a
practice session.

The prop is also clean and has no nicks, and doesn't leak any grease.
However, it has to be pulled every six years, crated, and sent to Florida
for overhall, then returned, remounted, and rebalanced.

Oh well, it's just a toy and there doesn't seem to be much choice in the
matter.


  #14  
Old July 20th 05, 05:12 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


On 19-Jul-2005, "Jim N." wrote:

Oh well, it's just a toy and there doesn't seem to be much choice in the
matter.



Man, I really feel for you. What a dismal set of choices. Of course, as of
now the SB is just that, and legally you aren't required to do anything.
But everybody seems to feel that an AD is on the way.

The SB calls for pulling affected engines within 50 hours or 6 months,
whichever occurs first. At least you have a few ours to "burn" during the
good summer and fall acro weather. The folks I REALLY feel for are owners
of affected planes that rely on them regularly for business use and/or
rental revenues. I think Lycoming ought to give some consideration to those
cases

--
-Elliott Drucker
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
crankshaft counterweights Dave Butler Owning 10 February 10th 05 04:08 PM
Lycoming 0-360 factory overhaul core charges - Does Air Powertell the truth ? Mike Spera Owning 6 December 13th 04 01:13 AM
Lycoming remote oil filter Evan Carew Home Built 0 November 5th 04 10:09 PM
Lycoming Sued jls Home Built 0 February 13th 04 02:01 PM
Lycoming 320 and EAA Light Sport Aircraft ? Dave Jackson Home Built 29 October 20th 03 01:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.