If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Why is it, then, that AOPA is crowing about the record number of members?
IMO, the high cost of flying is more due to excessive liability litigation, high fuel prices, and exhorbitant certification costs for airframes and engines. "Dude" wrote in message ... As the numbers dwindle the ability for you to continue your enjoyment is more threatened than by it increasing. Much of the cost of GA is due to lack of economy of scale. If you want to ever sell your plane, you will need a pilot to buy it. Your ability to keep your airport open is a direct function of how many voters your local pilot population can speak to or know. Our ability to keep the majors (and the ever increasing threat from bizjets) from punting us from the skies and airports) is dependent on our ability to keep the piston friendly FBO's and flight schools in business. I think perhaps you are letting this issue get ahead of you, and in the long run it will end flying just the same as letting the plane get ahead of you. Perhaps I am a bit of a chicken little on this, but the sky IS falling, albeit slowly. "Jeremy Lew" wrote in message ... I don't understand many peoples' obsession with growth in the popularity of GA. The skies are plenty crowded enough as it is around where I fly. "Dude" wrote in message news "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "Dude" wrote: So what interests you? Something that will take my daughter, my grandson, me and some luggage to Houston, against a 15kt headwind, nonstop, with comfortable IFR reserves. There are always mission trade offs, perhaps its just not the plane for you. That doesn't make it any less a good design, just not designed for your purpose. The SR20 is interesting, but I am still thinking the wingload is too high for a new pilot (less than 300 hours). Let him rent Skyhawks awhile. This is what has been killing GA for years. There have been surveys to find why more wealthy people do not take up aviation as a hobby. They found a number of problems that will not change FAA hassles, pimple faced instructors with no people skills, etc. The other thing was the flight schools are mostly dumps with a bunch of old ratty planes. Even a new Skyhawk is essentially an old plane. How do we expect to grow general aviation if we REFUSE to change what we are doing to attract new pilots? Isn't this the definition of insanity? Cessna is unconsciously doing to aviation what Microsoft and IBM did to technology - killing fast growth and innovation in favor of predictable business. Sure, 100 pounds would be more interesting, and I bet they could go to 200 hp and get it, but would that really make it more marketable? It would to me. You have to remember that these planes now come with a lot more weight requirements due to the new FARS. Like what, for instance? Better crash protection for one. This necessarily adds weight. Everyone wants more avionics now too. I wonder if the 40 could make your trip if it only had a single 430 and long range tanks. The only thing better in my book is the Lancair, and it's a lot more money. It's really in a different class, along with the SR-22. If it didn't have a side stick, I'd rather have an SR-20 than a D-40 for the better range & load. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SWRFI Pirep.. (long) | Dave S | Home Built | 20 | May 21st 04 03:02 PM |
Garmin 1000 turn co-ordinator? | John H. Kay | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | December 31st 03 03:37 PM |