If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
John wrote:
The only negative with the Russia is it is a little pitch sensitive, requiring re-adjusting attitude with spoiler changes (that is, more spoilers cause the plane to slow down). Takes a bit of practice to smooth out your landing if you transition directly from a more stable bird like the 2-33. All the gliders I've flown have required a pitch-down when the spoilers were opened, including my ASH 26 E, ASW 20 C, Libelle 301, Blanik, and more. The Russia does have a very bad tailwheel that just does not hold air. Expect to spend around $130 to replace the Russian tailwheel with a Tost tailwheel. Some owners report leaky mainwheels, but nothing beyond having to add air every other month. Cheap fixes ($8) involving Slime are available for the mainwheel. All tires lose pressure, smaller tires lose pressure more quickly. The 500 x 5 Goodyear tire on the mainwheel of my ASH 26 E required air every month, even with it's inner tube. It's normal, not a "Russia" thing. -- ----- change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Willie wrote:
The PW5 seems to be a good fit for me in terms of performance, but I have heard and read nothing but negative comments from other sailplane pilots. Is it really a bad ship? It seems to have the performance that I'm looking for (33 to 1) or better. It isn't a bad ship. The negative comments are basically 1) "it's ugly", and 2) "you can buy a used glider with more performance for less money". The #1 is personal taste. #2 is correct, but not decisive. If you want a new glider instead of a much older one, or want to fly in the World Class, then the PW5 is worth considering. There are groups much more enthused about the PW5 than some the posters here; for example, try http://www.wcsa.org/ [World Class Soaring Association] I think the New Zealanders like them too. I had two nice flights in PW5s when I was down there a few years ago. -- ----- change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Eric's comment is correct, and could do with some expansion.
From personal experience, owning a 30+ year old glass ship is something of a never ending tinkering excercise. The seals are rotten, and the canopy doesnt fit like the designer intended, and the hinges are worn (still legal but I'd like to replace them), and the gell coat is dull (got to get better with the polish, or maybe that refinish is due) and then you have to get some regulated part worked on, like - your oxygen cylinder tested and there is no ISO documentation. Please note that this is with what many consider to be a "mint" condition 1971 model Schempp-hirth glider. A neglected one, or a rare and poorly supported one is going to be a lot of work... I happen to enjoy working on the toy as much as flying her, but if you want a "get in and fly" experience a new glider will inevitably be less work. For us it is academic, no PW5s in the country. Eric Greenwell wrote: Willie wrote: The PW5 seems to be a good fit for me in terms of performance, but I have heard and read nothing but negative comments from other sailplane pilots. Is it really a bad ship? It seems to have the performance that I'm looking for (33 to 1) or better. It isn't a bad ship. The negative comments are basically 1) "it's ugly", and 2) "you can buy a used glider with more performance for less money". The #1 is personal taste. #2 is correct, but not decisive. If you want a new glider instead of a much older one, or want to fly in the World Class, then the PW5 is worth considering. There are groups much more enthused about the PW5 than some the posters here; for example, try http://www.wcsa.org/ [World Class Soaring Association] I think the New Zealanders like them too. I had two nice flights in PW5s when I was down there a few years ago. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
I'll add that it's normal for most general aviation tires to lose air. Those
on my Mooney used to require adding air every month or so. But there is a fix. Michelin sells an aircraft tube advertised to hold air better, and it works! "Eric Greenwell" wrote in message ... John wrote: The only negative with the Russia is it is a little pitch sensitive, requiring re-adjusting attitude with spoiler changes (that is, more spoilers cause the plane to slow down). Takes a bit of practice to smooth out your landing if you transition directly from a more stable bird like the 2-33. All the gliders I've flown have required a pitch-down when the spoilers were opened, including my ASH 26 E, ASW 20 C, Libelle 301, Blanik, and more. The Russia does have a very bad tailwheel that just does not hold air. Expect to spend around $130 to replace the Russian tailwheel with a Tost tailwheel. Some owners report leaky mainwheels, but nothing beyond having to add air every other month. Cheap fixes ($8) involving Slime are available for the mainwheel. All tires lose pressure, smaller tires lose pressure more quickly. The 500 x 5 Goodyear tire on the mainwheel of my ASH 26 E required air every month, even with it's inner tube. It's normal, not a "Russia" thing. -- ----- change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Eric Greenwell wrote: Willie wrote: It isn't a bad ship. The negative comments are basically 1) "it's ugly", and 2) "you can buy a used glider with more performance for less money". The #1 is personal taste. #2 is correct, but not decisive. If you want a 1. You can't see if it's ugly from the inside. Besides, you're going to wear that stupid fishing hat and take pictures your wife will see forever, and you're worried about what the GLIDER looks like? 2. You can buy a used glider with heavier wings that has instant maintenance needs for less money. You have all those hours to work on the glider, but you can't do another two turns in each thermal? :P The biggest advantages of the Russia and PW-5 is that they are small and light and new. This is very convenient. I personally wouldn't give up this kind of convenience and ease of use for better performance in a glider I was going to own, but there are those who don't mind something bigger, heavier, that needs more frequent TLC. Which type are you? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Eric Greenwell wrote:
Willie wrote: The PW5 seems to be a good fit for me in terms of performance, but I have heard and read nothing but negative comments from other sailplane pilots. Is it really a bad ship? It seems to have the performance that I'm looking for (33 to 1) or better. It isn't a bad ship. The negative comments are basically 1) "it's ugly", and 2) "you can buy a used glider with more performance for less money". The #1 is personal taste. #2 is correct, but not decisive. If you want a new glider instead of a much older one, or want to fly in the World Class, then the PW5 is worth considering. There are groups much more enthused about the PW5 than some the posters here; for example, try I forgot to mention that if a PW5 is interesting to you, and a used glider is acceptable, a used PW5 will be even cheaper. -- ----- change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
2. You can buy a used glider with heavier wings that has
instant maintenance needs for less money. You have all those hours to work on the glider, but you can't do another two turns in each thermal? :P The biggest advantages of the Russia and PW-5 is that they are small and light and new. This is very convenient. I dunno about this.......I've seen and owned a number of really nice older gliders..sure there are plenty of "lumps" for sale out there, but still for not too may $ you can still find some pretty mint older gliders out there....maintenance on sailplanes really isn't all that complicated either and you pretty much can't "ware one out"...you can of course damage one or mistreat one, you can update one if you like but these are pretty much all user issues and even new glider buyers do all this too.... but you are right about one thing, some of these new light and ultra-light gliders are easy to assemble and disassemble and that may be more important to some of their owners since they probably will need to retrieve them more often when they don't make the final glide home! :-) tim |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Tim Mara wrote:
2. You can buy a used glider with heavier wings that has instant maintenance needs for less money. You have all those hours to work on the glider, but you can't do another two turns in each thermal? :P The biggest advantages of the Russia and PW-5 is that they are small and light and new. This is very convenient. snip but you are right about one thing, some of these new light and ultra-light gliders are easy to assemble and disassemble and that may be more important to some of their owners since they probably will need to retrieve them more often when they don't make the final glide home! :-) If the pilots are flying to the limits of their craft, they'll all landout about the same. If they are flying to make it home, L/D doesn't make much difference - the lower L/D glider just doesn't go as far before turning around and heading b. Landouts are up to the pilot, once he has some experience. But to address the weight and size issue: These can actually be an important factor. One thing that keeps many people from going cross-country is the potential difficulty of a retrieve. A 600 pound glider may be more than a guy and his wife can manage, but 300 pound glider (like a Russia) isn't. Or it may mean s/he can retrieve themselves, instead of always needing a crew. An easy to retrieve glider is very liberating for some people, even if it has less performance, because they are willing to land out more instead of nervously sticking close to airports. A high L/D glider effectively puts the airports closer together, but having a light enough glider so that the retrieve isn't a bitch is a viable alternative. -- ----- change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Kirk Stant wrote:
(Mark James Boyd) wrote in message news:4034d0ed$1@darkstar... The biggest advantages of the Russia and PW-5 is that they are small and light and new. This is very convenient. So what if they are small and light? How much time do you spend rigging? If you really mind lifting a few more pounds for a couple of minutes, then by all means get a PW-5 (or Russia, or Apis, etc..). Well, I've also pushed the PW-5 singlehanded about 5 miles total. I've NEVER pushed the L-13 or 2-33 singlehanded. When I land out on a runway, it's nice to be able to push the glider to a certain spot off the runway afterwards, on my own. The 1-26 was great for this too. A trailer+glider that requires a V8 truck to tow is different from one I can tow with a 6 cylinder SUV. The weight is there, and has other implications than just rigging... Ironically, we all seem to be paying money to go the gym to work out... Not me, brother. I'm already in shape. The shape I've chosen is an oval... \ {-()=[ / Some personal observations: I know 4 pilots out here in Arizona who have owned PW-5s; 3 sold them after a couple of seasons and moved up to 15m ships (304CZ, ASW-20, and Pik-20). The 4th flew his PW-5 primarily to compete and set records, since he also had an LS8 at the time, since replaced by an ASH-26, he is hardly the typical PW-5 owner (actually I don't know if he still has it). There is one PW-5 still based at Turf where I fly, but it's owner bought a motorglider and I havn't seen the PW fly in a while (pity, since I've been wanting to try it out before it gets sold!). It sounds like the pilots that got a coupla seasons and the record setter got some great use. These gliders are entry level, and I'd expect someone to move up later. I thought the poster was looking for a first time glider (kinda like a Cezzna 172.) The PIK-20 with a few groundloops and the ASW-20 with quite a bit of complexity are excellent second gliders. I've seen a few "used" gliders. Gelcoats, extra weight from repairs, etc. aren't uncommon, and if you get something really mint, the $$$$$$ really go upupupup... This isn't a slam of the PW-5, which from all accounts is a nice little glider to fly, and is popular with clubs. But anyone thinking of buying one - especially new - instead of flying one in a club, needs to think hard about what they want to do with it. I actually tried to get our club to buy one, so I could race it in the World Class - no luck. Agreed, these are good club gliders and entry level first gliders. If someone has quite a bit more experience, or knows for sure they will stick with the sport like us fanatics, something sexier may be warranted. After all, I haven't seen a World class in the regionals anywhere near where I fly... Just my opinion, worth every penny you paid for it. Kirk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Website Mltry.- Your Information, Customized for You, Family Communication, Chat, Please Help by Visiting and Signing Gues | Wolf | Naval Aviation | 0 | January 8th 05 06:16 AM |
Russia Threatens to Strike Terror Bases | Dav1936531 | Military Aviation | 51 | September 18th 04 12:52 AM |
P-3 Orion website updated | Marco P.J. Borst | Naval Aviation | 0 | March 6th 04 08:21 PM |
Old website suddenly dies, replaced by new one | Jack Glendening | Soaring | 2 | February 8th 04 05:31 PM |
Russia joins France and Germany | captain! | Military Aviation | 12 | September 9th 03 09:56 AM |