A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Fast glass biplanes



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old November 22nd 03, 05:27 PM
Jay
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What I'm running now (in computer model) is a stagger between the top
and bottom wing with the bottom wing leading the top by a full chord.
The top has a dihedral of 5 degrees and the bottom wing has none so as
you move out on the span, the vertical distance between the surfaces
increaces.

This is actually flying quite nice although I have seen some drop off
in top speed. The flaps generate a strong pitching tendancy since the
wing with the flaps is no longer at the CG. The next step is I'm
going to adopt the airfoil from one the available glider wings and as
a result probably lengthen the stubby wings somewhat to recover the
lift with the goal of leaving behind some of the induced drag.

Regards

(Robert Bonomi) wrote in message servers.com...
In article ,
Jay wrote:
Hey don't give up Dave, nobody said it would be easy. You haven't
convinced me not to run the model. But you have pointed out 2 things
I will look at more carefully:

1) Will the root/tip losses from 2 wings eat up any benefit from the
shorter/lighter spans? Are there tip treatments that diminish this?


the big killer is the interaction in airflow pattern across the two
surfaces.

putting a 2nd surface "above" a lifting surface _decreases_ the available
lift from that first surface. you have a 'compression' effect on the
'ram air' passing between the two surfaces, due to the constriction from
the _reduction_ in cross-section of the space between the two surfaces,
as you proceed from leading edge of the lifting surface back to the point
of maximum rise in that surface.

To minimize these kinds of effects, the space between the surfaces has
to be relatively -large-, the velocity of the air _comparatively_ slow,
*and* you need to let that 'built-up' ram-air effect bleed off in the
only direction it can go -- i.e., _sideways_, towards the tips of the
wing(s).

2) What wing configuration can be used that minimizes mutual
interference between the 2 lifting surfaces.


One simple answer to -that- one is 'obvious' -- place them infinitely far
apart. grin

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Looking for a fast light plane Dave lentle Home Built 2 August 6th 03 03:41 AM
Glass Goose Dr Bach Home Built 1 August 3rd 03 05:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.