A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

U-234 mention in the paper



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old August 4th 03, 02:28 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dav1936531" wrote in message
...
From: "Keith Willshaw"


Of course they did which is a good reason for not adopting their
methods, even if the captain was a Nazi, which is unproven
he was still entitled to be treated as per the Geneva convention.
Keith


The other poster said he was complaining about rough treatment and having

been
"demonized" by American personnel stuffed full of anti-Nazi propaganda. He
didn't mention that he wasn't treated as per the Geneva convention. Do you

have
information that he wasn't?


rough treatment would appear to contravene the Geneva Convention

Quote
Art 13. Prisoners of war must at all times be humanely treated. Any unlawful
act or omission by the Detaining Power causing death or seriously
endangering the health of a prisoner of war in its custody is prohibited,
and will be regarded as a serious breach of the present Convention. In
particular, no prisoner of war may be subjected to physical mutilation or to
medical or scientific experiments of any kind which are not justified by the
medical, dental or hospital treatment of the prisoner concerned and carried
out in his interest.

Likewise, prisoners of war must at all times be protected, particularly
against acts of violence or intimidation and against insults and public
curiosity.
/Quote


I am not sure that receiving a fat lip after one gets sassy with your POW

guard
violates the convention, or would call for an inquiry even.


It does and would just as as a civil prison officer giving a fat lip to a
sassy
inmate woukd be illegal and call for an inquiry.

Dave


Keith


  #12  
Old August 4th 03, 08:21 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Denyav" wrote in message
...
As for the cargo it was carrying around 500kg of natural Uranium Oxide,
nothing like enough to build a reactor but which in the absence of

tungsten
or chrome was a useful additive for hardening steel.


Well,Keith U-234 was carying besides u-235 you mentioned,something much

more
important than that, namely 12 steel canisters. After a

military-scientific
commission investigated the canisters,the chairman of commission stated in

July
1945 that the Germans were "100 years ahead of US".
Some documents should stay at least 75 years under the lock.



Ah yes mysterious documents who's existence cant be proven cause they
are so sekrit that only readers pf konspiracy magazine know of their
existence.

And of course the Nazis had a zillion atom bombs but kindly
Uncle Adolf didnt want to use them against those nice Russians
who were sending him birthday greetings by howitzer.

Silly season is here again.

Keith


  #13  
Old August 4th 03, 09:19 PM
Clark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Keith Willshaw" wrote in news:bgmbo3
:

[snip]

Silly season is here again.

In a newsgroup with T*rver, D*nyev, B*rtie, etc., does silly season ever end?

:-)

  #14  
Old August 4th 03, 10:14 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Clark" stillnospam@me wrote in message
...
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in news:bgmbo3
:

[snip]

Silly season is here again.

In a newsgroup with T*rver, D*nyev, B*rtie, etc., does silly season ever

end?

:-)


True very true

I defer to your greater insight.

Keith


  #15  
Old August 5th 03, 03:16 AM
Lawrence Dillard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Denyav" wrote in message
...

SNIP

Well,Keith U-234 was carying besides u-235 you mentioned,something much

more
important than that, namely 12 steel canisters. After a

military-scientific
commission investigated the canisters,the chairman of commission stated in

July
1945 that the Germans were "100 years ahead of US".
Some documents should stay at least 75 years under the lock.


This one is hard to accept, inasmuch as the cargo was being sent to Japan.
Is it logical to conclude that Hitler's Germany would send technology so
advanced that she could not herself make use of it, to Japan, which at the
time certainly had no comparable technological base from which to capitalize
on it, so late in the day?





  #17  
Old August 5th 03, 04:49 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Denyav" wrote in message
...
This one is hard to accept, inasmuch as the cargo was being sent to

Japan.
Is it logical to conclude that Hitler's Germany would send technology so
advanced that she could not herself make use of it, to Japan, which at

the
time certainly had no comparable technological base from which to

capitalize
on it, so late in the day?


Actualy they were in process but they needed two more months for nuclear
weapons and at least 8 months for America rocket.
BTW advances in German advanced weapon research was the real reason behind
Normandy landings.


Actually the real reason was to make sure Western Europe didnt
become part of the Soviet Empire

Keith


  #18  
Old August 5th 03, 11:13 PM
Vaughn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Denyav" wrote in message
...
I am sure Uncle Adolf would use atom bombs aganist anyone,even aganist

Germans
only if he had one.
He needed only two months more to do that when US forces occupied

Thuringen
Forest.

I would like to see your source on that one. My understanding is
that the Germans were years from nuclear success. There is a picture that
sometimes surfaces of a convincing-looking nuclear reactor, but they never
made it work. They never achieved a chain reaction, a basic step towards
designing and producing a plutonium weapon. Several books/articles that I
have read point to one crucial miscalculation, they had miscalculated the
cross-section of the Uranium atom to a neutron reaction. There is some
speculation that the miscalculation was deliberate. I know of no Uranium
separation plants that they had on a sufficient scale to make a weapon
within any short time frame, so they were not near to building a Uranium
weapon. For an idea what that takes, go visit Oak Ridge.

BTW Keith, after the cease-fire British forces seized in Hamburg 10 t

stored
heavy water

Heavy water is convenient, because it is a very good moderator of
neutrons and makes it much easier to make a nuclear reactor. However, it is
not a necessary or even a common part of today's nuclear reactors and AFAIK
is not used in nuclear weapons at all.


,what do you thing Germans,famous for their precise
bookkeeping,simply forget such important ware neccesary for the

development of
their nuclear program in a warehouse in Hamburg?


Who says they did?



  #19  
Old August 6th 03, 01:57 AM
B2431
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Actualy they were in process but they needed two more months for nuclear
weapons and at least 8 months for America rocket.
BTW advances in German advanced weapon research was the real reason behind
Normandy landings.

I sure would like to know what history books you have been reading. The
invasion of Normandy along with the one from the south was to keep the Soviets
from occupying nothern and central Europe.

As for the 2 months until they had an atomic bomb I'd sure like to know when
they were going to get sufficient uranium or plutonium since they had no where
near enough in May 1945. The Brits put the German nuke progam scientists in a
well bugged house in England after they were captured. They reacted to the news
of the atomic bombing of Japan with shock. They couldn't understand how the
U.S. had pulled it off since they themselves hadn't figured out how to do it.

As for the Amerika rocket IIRC its payload was around 500 - 1000 kg. I may be
wrong, but that's how I remember it. They never intended to heave nukes with
it.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired
  #20  
Old August 6th 03, 12:55 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Mullen" wrote in message
...
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message
...


Good point Keith!

I went there once, they've made a really good job of reconstructing the
array for the experiment. Haigerloch is also notable for the quality of

its
beer, btw!

http://www.haigerloch.de/stadt/kelle...ch/EKELLER.HTM

John



Its definitely on my 'must see' list

Keith


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
You can now buy inkjet decal paper by the sheet Charlotte Gaisford Home Built 0 November 8th 04 01:59 PM
Tracking the Elusive Tracing Paper Veeduber Home Built 18 August 30th 04 12:53 PM
More Drywall Gussets Veeduber Home Built 8 December 16th 03 03:55 AM
Looking for sand paper rolls and adhesive Roger Halstead Home Built 9 August 8th 03 08:58 AM
PAPER PLANE TIPS Ronald Mcdonald Home Built 0 July 21st 03 06:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.