If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
... "John Mullen" wrote: "Gerdeus" wrote in message . com... "John Mullen" wrote in message ... "Gerdeus" wrote in message om... There's no descendant of the P-59A. But every airliner that flies, with its engines hung in pods beneath the wings, owes something to the Me-262. Not true. Just like every airliner that flies with the engines embedded inside the wings or fuselage does not owe something to the Yak 15 or P-80. Name one. Boeing 727. Nope. It had three engines in pods at the tail. One was served by an air intake at the front of the fin. See http://www.cactuswings.com/psa/hangar/727.shtml Rather like the DC 10, the L1011 or the Trident. John Comet/Nimrod. Yep, I think you'd have to go back that far. Podded engines are safer and easier to replace/service John. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Enola Gay flies into new A-bomb controversy | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 21st 03 09:10 PM |
Enola Gay Restored | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 0 | August 19th 03 03:39 AM |