If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
FLARM Fusion Range
On Saturday, April 24, 2021 at 12:51:57 PM UTC-7, Matt Herron Jr. wrote:
ads-b update I looked at the FAA report for two other pilots that flew out of the Williams area on Friday 4/16, Ramy ( https://www.dropbox.com/s/f7wgkinoru...55266.pdf?dl=0 ) and Peter Deane ( https://www.dropbox.com/s/8vkprmv4gu...57927.pdf?dl=0 ). They both had pretty identical long flights all the way around the top of the valley to Trinity Center and back down the Eastern edge of the valley, then back to Williams. Ramy showed a normal report, while Peter showed 48.01% fail on Baro., and 48.01% on GPS. alt. Why are these two 48.01% numbers identical? Bad ground station for part of the flight? If so why did Ramy have no issues with Baro. or GPS Alt.? Matt Matt, Performance report user guide. https://adsbperformance.faa.gov/PAPRUsersGuide.pdf Richard www.craggyaero.com |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
FLARM Fusion Range
On Saturday, April 24, 2021 at 12:51:57 PM UTC-7, Matt Herron Jr. wrote:
ads-b update I looked at the FAA report for two other pilots that flew out of the Williams area on Friday 4/16, Ramy ( https://www.dropbox.com/s/f7wgkinoru...55266.pdf?dl=0 ) and Peter Deane ( https://www.dropbox.com/s/8vkprmv4gu...57927.pdf?dl=0 ). They both had pretty identical long flights all the way around the top of the valley to Trinity Center and back down the Eastern edge of the valley, then back to Williams. Ramy showed a normal report, while Peter showed 48.01% fail on Baro., and 48.01% on GPS. alt. Why are these two 48.01% numbers identical? Bad ground station for part of the flight? If so why did Ramy have no issues with Baro. or GPS Alt.? Matt I cannot guess. But as mentioned before getting the detailed kmz and csv data from the FAA might show something. Just email them to me if you have them. Yes it say might be possible that the Willows ADS-B tower has a problem and the Redding one was working fine and Ramy flew in the Redding tower airspace part of that time and the rest of you did not. That would stand out clearly in the detailed reports. I'm happy to follow up with the FAA if it looks like there was a site problem, but the detailed reports would help. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
FLARM Fusion Range
On Saturday, April 24, 2021 at 12:51:57 PM UTC-7, Matt Herron Jr. wrote:
ads-b update I looked at the FAA report for two other pilots that flew out of the Williams area on Friday 4/16, Ramy ( https://www.dropbox.com/s/f7wgkinoru...55266.pdf?dl=0 ) and Peter Deane ( https://www.dropbox.com/s/8vkprmv4gu...57927.pdf?dl=0 ). They both had pretty identical long flights all the way around the top of the valley to Trinity Center and back down the Eastern edge of the valley, then back to Williams. Ramy showed a normal report, while Peter showed 48.01% fail on Baro., and 48.01% on GPS. alt. Why are these two 48.01% numbers identical? Bad ground station for part of the flight? If so why did Ramy have no issues with Baro. or GPS Alt.? Matt I cannot guess, again detailed kmz and csv reports would help. I also have no idea when/if ever the other glider ADS-B out systems ever passed a PAPR.. Instead of doing this publicity, why don't the glider pilots email me the detailed kmz and csv reports (whoever requested the PAPR reports reply to those FAA PAPR emails asking for the detailed reports). And I can take a look. I have all the detailed reports from Andy already. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
FLARM Fusion Range
Darryl
I don't have your current email. Please email me at matt (at) digital shorts (dot) com. MattOn Saturday, April 24, 2021 at 5:07:51 PM UTC-7, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Saturday, April 24, 2021 at 12:51:57 PM UTC-7, Matt Herron Jr. wrote: ads-b update I looked at the FAA report for two other pilots that flew out of the Williams area on Friday 4/16, Ramy ( https://www.dropbox.com/s/f7wgkinoru...55266.pdf?dl=0 ) and Peter Deane ( https://www..dropbox.com/s/8vkprmv4g...57927.pdf?dl=0 ). They both had pretty identical long flights all the way around the top of the valley to Trinity Center and back down the Eastern edge of the valley, then back to Williams. Ramy showed a normal report, while Peter showed 48.01% fail on Baro., and 48.01% on GPS. alt. Why are these two 48.01% numbers identical? Bad ground station for part of the flight? If so why did Ramy have no issues with Baro. or GPS Alt.? Matt I cannot guess, again detailed kmz and csv reports would help. I also have no idea when/if ever the other glider ADS-B out systems ever passed a PAPR. Instead of doing this publicity, why don't the glider pilots email me the detailed kmz and csv reports (whoever requested the PAPR reports reply to those FAA PAPR emails asking for the detailed reports). And I can take a look. I have all the detailed reports from Andy already. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
FLARM Fusion Range
Just remember, your FLARM doesn't alert you unless you're on a collision course.
https://i.imgur.com/QLpwpVu.gifv |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
FLARM Fusion Range
That’s not accurate. Flarm alerts you of any traffic within the range you specify, both visually and audio alerts. It will sound loud alarm only when you are on a collision course. This is not the same as alerting you.. All these can be configured in powerflarm and in the display so make sure you configure your devices correctly. This is not related do the range analysis that Matt is referring to.
Ramy On Saturday, April 24, 2021 at 7:53:55 PM UTC-7, wrote: Just remember, your FLARM doesn't alert you unless you're on a collision course. https://i.imgur.com/QLpwpVu.gifv |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
FLARM Fusion Range
Those reports rarely come completely clean. My guess it is since we cranking and banking or out of range. Some of my reports came completely clean, some have few red marks but usually less than 1% error so I stopped looking at those. I am only concerned if the failure % is significant. I did find a configuration error once which resulted in 100% failure and I was black listed until I corrected this but never received a letter from the FAA.
Ramy On Saturday, April 24, 2021 at 5:07:51 PM UTC-7, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Saturday, April 24, 2021 at 12:51:57 PM UTC-7, Matt Herron Jr. wrote: ads-b update I looked at the FAA report for two other pilots that flew out of the Williams area on Friday 4/16, Ramy ( https://www.dropbox.com/s/f7wgkinoru...55266.pdf?dl=0 ) and Peter Deane ( https://www..dropbox.com/s/8vkprmv4g...57927.pdf?dl=0 ). They both had pretty identical long flights all the way around the top of the valley to Trinity Center and back down the Eastern edge of the valley, then back to Williams. Ramy showed a normal report, while Peter showed 48.01% fail on Baro., and 48.01% on GPS. alt. Why are these two 48.01% numbers identical? Bad ground station for part of the flight? If so why did Ramy have no issues with Baro. or GPS Alt.? Matt I cannot guess, again detailed kmz and csv reports would help. I also have no idea when/if ever the other glider ADS-B out systems ever passed a PAPR. Instead of doing this publicity, why don't the glider pilots email me the detailed kmz and csv reports (whoever requested the PAPR reports reply to those FAA PAPR emails asking for the detailed reports). And I can take a look. I have all the detailed reports from Andy already. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
FLARM Fusion Range
Ramy,
How do you find out if you are blacklisted? Matt On Sunday, April 25, 2021 at 8:43:18 AM UTC-7, Ramy wrote: Those reports rarely come completely clean. My guess it is since we cranking and banking or out of range. Some of my reports came completely clean, some have few red marks but usually less than 1% error so I stopped looking at those. I am only concerned if the failure % is significant. I did find a configuration error once which resulted in 100% failure and I was black listed until I corrected this but never received a letter from the FAA. Ramy On Saturday, April 24, 2021 at 5:07:51 PM UTC-7, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Saturday, April 24, 2021 at 12:51:57 PM UTC-7, Matt Herron Jr. wrote: ads-b update I looked at the FAA report for two other pilots that flew out of the Williams area on Friday 4/16, Ramy ( https://www.dropbox.com/s/f7wgkinoru...55266.pdf?dl=0 ) and Peter Deane ( https://www.dropbox.com/s/8vkprmv4gu...57927.pdf?dl=0 ). They both had pretty identical long flights all the way around the top of the valley to Trinity Center and back down the Eastern edge of the valley, then back to Williams. Ramy showed a normal report, while Peter showed 48..01% fail on Baro., and 48.01% on GPS. alt. Why are these two 48.01% numbers identical? Bad ground station for part of the flight? If so why did Ramy have no issues with Baro. or GPS Alt.? Matt I cannot guess, again detailed kmz and csv reports would help. I also have no idea when/if ever the other glider ADS-B out systems ever passed a PAPR. Instead of doing this publicity, why don't the glider pilots email me the detailed kmz and csv reports (whoever requested the PAPR reports reply to those FAA PAPR emails asking for the detailed reports). And I can take a look. I have all the detailed reports from Andy already. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
FLARM Fusion Range
My first test flight in my Stemme a couple of years ago failed. That
was a 3+ hour flight with a lot of cranking around. The next day I made a simple race track flight just above 10K' AGL and close to the airport. After 30 minutes I landed. Passed 100%. Dan 5J On 4/25/21 9:43 AM, Ramy wrote: Those reports rarely come completely clean. My guess it is since we cranking and banking or out of range. Some of my reports came completely clean, some have few red marks but usually less than 1% error so I stopped looking at those. I am only concerned if the failure % is significant. I did find a configuration error once which resulted in 100% failure and I was black listed until I corrected this but never received a letter from the FAA. Ramy On Saturday, April 24, 2021 at 5:07:51 PM UTC-7, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Saturday, April 24, 2021 at 12:51:57 PM UTC-7, Matt Herron Jr. wrote: ads-b update I looked at the FAA report for two other pilots that flew out of the Williams area on Friday 4/16, Ramy ( https://www.dropbox.com/s/f7wgkinoru...55266.pdf?dl=0 ) and Peter Deane ( https://www.dropbox.com/s/8vkprmv4gu...57927.pdf?dl=0 ). They both had pretty identical long flights all the way around the top of the valley to Trinity Center and back down the Eastern edge of the valley, then back to Williams. Ramy showed a normal report, while Peter showed 48.01% fail on Baro., and 48.01% on GPS. alt. Why are these two 48.01% numbers identical? Bad ground station for part of the flight? If so why did Ramy have no issues with Baro. or GPS Alt.? Matt I cannot guess, again detailed kmz and csv reports would help. I also have no idea when/if ever the other glider ADS-B out systems ever passed a PAPR. Instead of doing this publicity, why don't the glider pilots email me the detailed kmz and csv reports (whoever requested the PAPR reports reply to those FAA PAPR emails asking for the detailed reports). And I can take a look. I have all the detailed reports from Andy already. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
FLARM Fusion Range
Matt, it will show up in a clear red comment on top saying something like you are on a no service list. I never received any notification so once I fixed the issue I contacted the FAA with a copy of clean report and after a month or so they removed me from the list.
Ramy On Sunday, April 25, 2021 at 10:01:37 AM UTC-7, Matt Herron Jr. wrote: Ramy, How do you find out if you are blacklisted? Matt On Sunday, April 25, 2021 at 8:43:18 AM UTC-7, Ramy wrote: Those reports rarely come completely clean. My guess it is since we cranking and banking or out of range. Some of my reports came completely clean, some have few red marks but usually less than 1% error so I stopped looking at those. I am only concerned if the failure % is significant. I did find a configuration error once which resulted in 100% failure and I was black listed until I corrected this but never received a letter from the FAA. Ramy On Saturday, April 24, 2021 at 5:07:51 PM UTC-7, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Saturday, April 24, 2021 at 12:51:57 PM UTC-7, Matt Herron Jr. wrote: ads-b update I looked at the FAA report for two other pilots that flew out of the Williams area on Friday 4/16, Ramy ( https://www.dropbox.com/s/f7wgkinoru...55266.pdf?dl=0 ) and Peter Deane ( https://www.dropbox.com/s/8vkprmv4gu...57927.pdf?dl=0 ). They both had pretty identical long flights all the way around the top of the valley to Trinity Center and back down the Eastern edge of the valley, then back to Williams. Ramy showed a normal report, while Peter showed 48.01% fail on Baro., and 48.01% on GPS. alt. Why are these two 48.01% numbers identical? Bad ground station for part of the flight? If so why did Ramy have no issues with Baro. or GPS Alt.? Matt I cannot guess, again detailed kmz and csv reports would help. I also have no idea when/if ever the other glider ADS-B out systems ever passed a PAPR. Instead of doing this publicity, why don't the glider pilots email me the detailed kmz and csv reports (whoever requested the PAPR reports reply to those FAA PAPR emails asking for the detailed reports). And I can take a look. I have all the detailed reports from Andy already. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flarm Range Analysis | Dan Marotta | Soaring | 22 | June 16th 17 10:54 AM |
Information for all users of Flarm, OEM FLARM supplier and Flarm PowerFlarm | [email protected] | Soaring | 28 | March 12th 16 04:31 AM |
FLARM Range | [email protected] | Soaring | 11 | June 16th 15 11:44 PM |
Flarm range | Ramy[_2_] | Soaring | 7 | May 7th 15 11:02 PM |
long range aircraft flying short-range routes? | tupolev204 | Piloting | 10 | April 22nd 11 07:44 PM |