If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#151
|
|||
|
|||
Gliders in the Grand Canyon
Mxsmanic wrote:
writes: Have you ever seen a real A/FD and noticed the chapter "Chart Bulletin" where updates to charts are published or the chapter "Notices" were the current altitudes for SFAR-50-2 are published? I've seen SFAR-50-2, the one that says "extending upward from the surface" and names a number of airfields within the SFRA. That's not what I asked, you babbling, arrogant, childish, twit. Could it be that since MSFS doesn't have anything like the A/FD you just can't understand the concept? -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
Gliders in the Grand Canyon
wrote Could it be that since MSFS doesn't have anything like the A/FD you just can't understand the concept? Bingo. Why is this twit still here? Why has he not been shunned? He is far worse than Ralphie, Zoom, Juan, .....all put together. Why is he still being acknowledged? -- Jim in NC |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
Gliders in the Grand Canyon
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... The active posters here who matter also show at least a modicum of respect, since both civility and competence have a common root in intelligence. The others don't matter, and so their respect or lack thereof is unimportant. Interesting statement for someone clearly shows not respect for those that attempt to educate him. Like most newsgroups, this newsgroup is afflicted by a gang of regulars who depend on each other for validation and bully anyone they don't like or anyone who threatens their security (which essentially means anyone who doesn't submit to them, as they tend to be very insecure). These people are not very intelligent and whether they respect others or not makes not difference (although it is interesting to note that such people rarely respect anyone beyond themselves). They also are not very knowledgeable on the topics under discussion, and their strutting aggression in the newsgroup cannot hide this. Their posts consist mostly of highly predictable personal attacks, and are easy to identify and ignore. Your usual troll, meant only to irritate and inflame. You really do sound like a broken record. I feel so sorry for the poor soul that desperately seeks the truth in aviation. I look past the standard noise for information that will be useful to me. Some people occasionally provide it. The rest is removed by the noise filters. Your noise filter is your own insanity. Not really. I post questions to which I'd like to have answers. Sometimes people give me useful answers; sometimes not. The static from the little boys may hide the useful information (if any) from the uninitiated but not from USENET veterans. You're a lying asswipe. You post here only to irritate pilots, and attempt to degrade their forum. The only thing that keeps your worthless butt alive is either the constant stream of the unsuspecting, or those with an overwhelming urge to be helpful to most anyone. You are simply a parasite of the sickest kind. |
#154
|
|||
|
|||
Gliders in the Grand Canyon
Maxwell writes:
Interesting statement for someone clearly shows not respect for those that attempt to educate him. I don't follow the alpha dog, and I don't join social clubs. If you know what you are talking about, you don't need anyone's validation; if you don't, no amount of validation will eliminate your insecurity. |
#155
|
|||
|
|||
Gliders in the Grand Canyon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Mxsmanic wrote: Maxwell writes: Interesting statement for someone clearly shows not respect for those that attempt to educate him. I don't follow the alpha dog, and I don't join social clubs. If you know what you are talking about, you don't need anyone's validation; if you don't, no amount of validation will eliminate your insecurity. Based on the number of things you think you know and how many times you've been corrected by real world pilots and controllers in this group, not only do you not follow any alpha dog in this group, you're no-where near the pack; in fact, I doubt anyone would want you near the pack. See Anthony, You come here with off the wall, incorrect, and most of the time, outlandish statements that you think are fact, and argue that experienced people here are wrong when they correct you. You've done it so much that you'vegone beyond us having to prove you wrong. You actually need to prove yourself RIGHT. And time and time again you have *FAILED* to do that. Insecure? no. bark dog and yip dog following alpha dog in a pack? no. Waiting for you to come to your senses and see how foolish you are to throw the experience of pilots in this group back in their faces? yes. However, there's more of a chance that the US will launch spy satellites over Canada and than you coming to your senses. BL. - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGbPftyBkZmuMZ8L8RAhTCAJ9Don3F2gS8Xf2w1ZQWKd 2YlIQp+QCfUDTw IOazNDFonezFKuegs4ZkvHQ= =F6mH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#156
|
|||
|
|||
Gliders in the Grand Canyon
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Maxwell writes: Interesting statement for someone clearly shows not respect for those that attempt to educate him. I don't follow the alpha dog, and I don't join social clubs. If you know what you are talking about, you don't need anyone's validation; if you don't, no amount of validation will eliminate your insecurity. Clearly not the point dumbass. Your lack of respect simply disqualifies any of you opinions based on your own criteria. |
#157
|
|||
|
|||
Gliders in the Grand Canyon
A Guy Called Tyketto writes:
Based on the number of things you think you know and how many times you've been corrected by real world pilots and controllers in this group, not only do you not follow any alpha dog in this group, you're no-where near the pack; in fact, I doubt anyone would want you near the pack. I wouldn't want to follow the alpha dog, either. That's for schoolchildren and angry young males, and I am neither. |
#158
|
|||
|
|||
Gliders in the Grand Canyon
Maxwell writes:
Clearly not the point dumbass. Your lack of respect simply disqualifies any of you opinions based on your own criteria. Respect has no correlation with the validity of statements a person might make. |
#159
|
|||
|
|||
Gliders in the Grand Canyon
Another War Story In the time frame '49-'53 I was instructing in F-80A/B's at Willie Field, Chandler AZ (just south of Phoenix). On numerous occasions I would fly up to the Grand Canyon and do loops in Canyon below the rim. They finally made us stop as we were scaring the donkeys carrying tourists up and down from rim to river at bottom. Oh, those were the days ) Big John ********************************************** On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 15:05:06 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote: If there were no airspace restrictions, would it be possible/safe to fly gliders in the Grand Canyon? There's not much of a place to land in the canyon, of course, but I don't know if there are thermals or something (?) that would allow a glider to climb back up out of the canyon after gliding below the rim. Is it possible? Has anyone done it? |
#160
|
|||
|
|||
Gliders in the Grand Canyon
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Maxwell writes: Clearly not the point dumbass. Your lack of respect simply disqualifies any of you opinions based on your own criteria. Respect has no correlation with the validity of statements a person might make. 6/8/2007 at 12:05 am, in this thread you wrote. "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... The active posters here who matter also show at least a modicum of respect, since both civility and competence have a common root in intelligence. Your own words just two days ago dip****. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Grand Canyon West Airport - 1G4 | Dan | Piloting | 6 | November 29th 06 01:11 AM |
Grand Canyon overflight proposal | john smith | Piloting | 71 | April 23rd 06 05:30 AM |
Four States and the Grand Canyon | Mary Daniel or David Grah | Soaring | 6 | December 6th 04 10:36 AM |
PIREP: Grand Canyon Caverns (L37) | Tony Cox | Piloting | 4 | November 2nd 03 12:54 PM |
Near Catasstrophy over Grand Canyon! | Boudewijn van Ingen | Simulators | 5 | August 6th 03 09:55 PM |