A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sparrowhawk/Apis for rent



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12  
Old February 29th 04, 12:32 AM
Vaughn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mark James Boyd" wrote in message
news:40411bd3$1@darkstar...

As a side note, 61.113(g) seems to say a PPL is excepted from
restrictions on compensation for glider towing. Hmmm...hadn't seen
that before. Interesting...


61.113(g) says nothing about compensation. That said, you are not the
only one confused on that point and it is covered in the part 61 FAQ
http://www.soaringsafety.org/FAQ_Glider.doc. See below:

Vaughn


"
QUESTION: I have reviewed your question in which you asked
whether a private pilot may receive compensation while towing gliders, in
accordance with the new §61.113(g).



ANSWER: The answer is no, a private pilot may not receive
compensation for towing a glider.



The intent, and the wording of the new §61.113(g), was to permit a private
pilot who meets the requirements of §61.69 of this part to “. . . act as
pilot in command of an aircraft towing a glider” for the purpose of logging
pilot in command (PIC) time. The new rule was never intended to conflict
with the FAA’s long standing legal interpretations and policies on
compensation for private pilots. And the wording of the new §61.113(g) only
addresses the issue that permits a private pilot to “. . . act as pilot in
command of an aircraft towing a glider” for the purpose of permitting a
private pilot to log pilot in command time. As you recall, the wording of
the old §61.69 permitted a private pilot to act as a PIC but was moot on
logging the time. The new §61.113(g) was issued to correct it.



However, we agree the wording of the new §61.113(a) may be confusing. In
the next go-around on correcting some of the wording mistakes, we have
recorded it as a candidate for correction to conform the intent and the
wording of §61.113(g).

{q&a-72}"






 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.