If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
Why airplanes taxi
On Feb 11, 6:20*pm, Clark wrote:
terry wrote in news:5f088abd-cbda-4dba-a3dd- : [snip happened] Not to detract from your lecture but up in the northern hemisphere we tend to use 28.96 as the molecular weight of air. Perhaps some of the lighter molecules settle out in the south? :-) I shouldnt have been so precise. its just a number I use frequently in my work that allows for 0.83 v/v % water.( an average value for my neck of the woods) After all is said and done, perhaps someone should ask MX to 'splain why sonic velocity in the atmosphere depends only on temperature... good luck with that one! |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
Why airplanes taxi
terry writes:
Now Mxs before you take off in your simulated Baron, do you check the takeoff performance figures in the simulated flight manual versus the lenght of runway at your simulated departure airport? No. According to the POH (the sim version and the real version are the same), 4500 feet is enough for any situation, so as long as I have at least 4500 feet, I'm fine. Do you know how to work out what your density altitude is? I have a calculator and an E6-B to work things out should that really become necessary. Real pilots do this if there is any doubt they might not have enough distance to clear the runway or any obstacles, and since you are so obsessed with manufacturing pretended reality I am sure you would want to be doing this also. I stay close enough to the center of the envelope that this is never a factor. It's a lot easier than pushing the envelope and having to do a truckload of calculations before every flight just to see if I can squeak by. |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
Why airplanes taxi
On Feb 10, 9:47 am, Mxsmanic wrote:
So, overall, the air is always warmest at the surface. There are some anomalies higher in the atmosphere. Not always. Not at all always. We frequently get inversions where the air 1000' feet up is much warmer than that on the surface. Inversions are very common here, and I would imagine they're common most anywhere away from the equator. We've had days here, in the winter, where we've left the ground where the temp is -20°C, and found -18°C at 3000' agl. Often I find the winds howling at 25 or 30 knots just 200 feet above the surface, while the wind on the ground is zilch and the temp is 25 degrees colder. "Always" just doesn't deal with reality. Works on a sim, I suppose. Parcels of air that rise in the atmosphere will cool as the pressure in the atmosphere drops, and this is responsible the adiabatic lapse rate. If you'd ever studied meteorology (Commercial Pilot groundschool) you'd know that the temp falls with altitude until we reach the tropopause. Then it starts rising until we reach the stratopause, where it starts to fall again through the mesosphere, and once we reach the thermosphere it rises again and keeps on rising, though the density is so low that the actual heat content is minimal. See this: http://www.ux1.eiu.edu/~cfjps/1400/FIG01_019.JPG In both cases, the correlation is between temperature and altitude, not temperature and pressure. If pressure rises, so does temperature. The air coming down off the Rockies here rises in temperature as its pressure rises in the descent. This is part of the chinook phenomenon's equation. The rest of that equation has to do with condensation of the vapor on the west side of the mountains, which releases the heat of evaporation back to the atmosphere so that the air's temperature fall is minimal as the air is forced upward by the terrain. So when it gets to 3000' on this side, it's MUCH warmer and drier than it was at 3000' on the west side. The snow evaporates (sublimates) in that warm, dry air. It doesn't have a chance to melt. The atmosphere is much more complex than you think. Dan |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
Why airplanes taxi
On Feb 12, 5:26*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
snip I stay close enough to the center of the envelope that this is never a factor. It's a lot easier than pushing the envelope and having to do a truckload of calculations before every flight just to see if I can squeak by. come on live a little, push that envelope, you only live once. dont die wondering Whats the worst thing that could happen? Terry |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
Why airplanes taxi
On Feb 12, 5:26*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
terry writes: snip Terry wrote a lot of things which you have not commented on in your reply. Do we take that you have finally realised you were talking crap about the gas laws not applying in the atmosphere or in space? Terry |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
Why airplanes taxi
Bertie the Bunyip wrote in
: Mxsmanic wrote in : WingFlaps writes: So how do you explain the rather well known lapse rate? It depends on which lapse rate you have in mind. The one which states that as the temperature rises, the two molecules in your head take a siesta. Bertie When did his intelligence double to two molecules? |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
Why airplanes taxi
Mxsmanic wrote:
I stay close enough to the center of the envelope that this is never a factor. It's a lot easier than pushing the envelope and having to do a truckload of calculations before every flight just to see if I can squeak by. Real pilots do the "truckload of calculations" all the time. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
Why airplanes taxi
On Feb 11, 12:37 pm, wrote:
We've had days here, in the winter, where we've left the ground where the temp is -20°C, and found -18°C at 3000' agl. My mistake. It was -20°C on the ground and +18°C at 3000' agl. A 38° difference. A difference in the "wrong" direction. Dan |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
Why airplanes taxi
terry writes:
come on live a little, push that envelope, you only live once. There are old pilots and bold pilots, but there are no old, bold pilots. You sound very much like the type of pilot that the FAA warns about. |
#130
|
|||
|
|||
Why airplanes taxi
terry writes:
Terry wrote a lot of things which you have not commented on in your reply. Do we take that you have finally realised you were talking crap about the gas laws not applying in the atmosphere or in space? I didn't bother to read the rest. I'm not sure who "we" might be, but Terry can certainly take it anyway that Terry wants. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
yrb-49-taxi.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 2 | September 25th 07 09:50 PM |
Hanoi Taxi | john smith | Piloting | 0 | April 27th 06 03:48 AM |
License To Taxi? | SteveT | Piloting | 29 | October 16th 05 04:57 PM |
Leaning for taxi | Jim Rosinski | Piloting | 28 | September 12th 04 03:53 AM |
taxi in reverse? | [email protected] | Owning | 20 | February 21st 04 12:26 AM |