If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Best warbird to own
I'm fantasy shopping for my new warbird or historic aircraft. My
requirements are ... - Historic value (rare and interesting aircraft) - Reasonably easy to fly - No turbines and under 12,500 lbs (no type rating needed) - Seats two - Aerobatic - Easy on the eyes I don't know enough to find the right aircraft. There are lots of P51s out there, so they are not rare enough. Further, they are said to be even harder to fly than normal for vintage and type. The P51 is one of the few WWII fighters that looks good in a two seat variant. Flying Me-109s are quite rare, but I've read they are just too tough to land and only seat one person. Two seat Spitfires are just ugly. The P38 and P39 are attactive because of the nosewheel gear. I understand that the P39 was also used as a trainer in WWII (so it might be easy to fly). A Folker Triplane is probably a reasonable plane to fly, but I have no desire to bath in castor oil and it only seats one person. My thinking suggests dive and torpedo bombers might be the solution. They typically seat two or more, and the naval aircraft should have reasonable low speed handling. Is this sound thinking? Would a Dauntless or Devistator or even a Stuka fit the requirements? What fantasy aircraft should I buy? -Much Thank |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
My thinking suggests dive and torpedo bombers might be the solution.
They typically seat two or more, and the naval aircraft should have reasonable low speed handling. Is this sound thinking? Would a Dauntless or Devistator or even a Stuka fit the requirements? You can pick up some TBMs fairly cheap, relative to other warbirds. Ron Pilot/Wildland Firefighter |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Charles
Talleyrand writes I'm fantasy shopping for my new warbird or historic aircraft. My requirements are ... - Historic value (rare and interesting aircraft) - Reasonably easy to fly - No turbines and under 12,500 lbs (no type rating needed) - Seats two - Aerobatic - Easy on the eyes I don't know enough to find the right aircraft. There are lots of P51s out there, so they are not rare enough. Further, they are said to be even harder to fly than normal for vintage and type. The P51 is one of the few WWII fighters that looks good in a two seat variant. Flying Me-109s are quite rare, but I've read they are just too tough to land and only seat one person. Two seat Spitfires are just ugly. The P38 and P39 are attactive because of the nosewheel gear. I understand that the P39 was also used as a trainer in WWII (so it might be easy to fly). A Folker Triplane is probably a reasonable plane to fly, but I have no desire to bath in castor oil and it only seats one person. My thinking suggests dive and torpedo bombers might be the solution. They typically seat two or more, and the naval aircraft should have reasonable low speed handling. Is this sound thinking? Would a Dauntless or Devistator or even a Stuka fit the requirements? What fantasy aircraft should I buy? -Much Thank 2-seat Hawker Sea Fury T Mk 20. -- Peter Ying tong iddle-i po! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Twydell" I'm fantasy shopping for my new warbird or historic aircraft. My The P38 and P39 are attactive because of the nosewheel gear. I understand that the P39 was also used as a trainer in WWII (so it might be easy to fly). Back in the 1950's I saw a privately owned P38 with USA markings land at the Regina airport in Saskatchewan. Three guys climbed out of it. They un-screwed the back of a tip tank and removed their suitcases! Don't know who owned it and I didn't write down the N---- tail number. I wonder if this P38 is still around??? Ed |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
In rec.aviation.military Ed Majden wrote:
: Back in the 1950's I saw a privately owned P38 with USA markings land at : the Regina airport in Saskatchewan. Three guys climbed out of it. They : un-screwed the back of a tip tank and removed their suitcases! Don't know : who owned it and I didn't write down the N---- tail number. I wonder if : this P38 is still around??? : Ed THREE guys? Wow I'm impressed. Was one in the nose? ;^) I've seen a film of Gary Cooper unfolding himself from teh back seat of a P-38 and he was really crammed in there. -- --- Gregg "Improvise, adapt, overcome." Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Phone: (617) 496-1558 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Gregg Germain" THREE guys? Wow I'm impressed. Was one in the nose? ;^) I couldn't belive it either until I saw the three of them get out. One of them couldn't see out. Ed |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Ed Majden" wrote in message news:f0Zqb.337796$pl3.116303@pd7tw3no... "Gregg Germain" THREE guys? Wow I'm impressed. Was one in the nose? ;^) I couldn't belive it either until I saw the three of them get out. One of them couldn't see out. The photo conversion I was talking about had a camera worth about as much as the plane at the time. For the camera operator to bail out he had to jettison the camera (on its own parachute) to make a hole he could reasonable expect to get out through. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Gregg Germain wrote: THREE guys? Wow I'm impressed. Was one in the nose? ;^) There was a modification of the P-38 that added a passenger seat in the nose. The troops gave it the nickname "droop-snoot". Since it replaced the guns, it was not a popular mod with the pilots. The military radio gear lived in a hole behind the pilot and was quite substantial. Remove that, and you can fit a rather cramped seat back there. George Patterson If you're not part of the solution, you can make a lot of money prolonging the problem. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
G.R. Patterson III wrote:
Gregg Germain wrote: THREE guys? Wow I'm impressed. Was one in the nose? ;^) There was a modification of the P-38 that added a passenger seat in the nose. The troops gave it the nickname "droop-snoot". Since it replaced the guns, it was not a popular mod with the pilots. The military radio gear lived in a hole behind the pilot and was quite substantial. Remove that, and you can fit a rather cramped seat back there. Not exactly a "passenger" seat, but rather another crew position for use as a level bomber, employing a Norden bombsight and a bombardier. Also, the P-38M night fighter variant had a second seat installed behind and above the pilot, with it's own canopy hatch- not sure what they did with the radios. Mike |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On 7 Nov 2003 13:52:51 -0400, Gregg Germain wrote:
In rec.aviation.military Ed Majden wrote: : Back in the 1950's I saw a privately owned P38 with USA markings land at : the Regina airport in Saskatchewan. Three guys climbed out of it. They : un-screwed the back of a tip tank and removed their suitcases! Don't know : who owned it and I didn't write down the N---- tail number. I wonder if : this P38 is still around??? : Ed THREE guys? Wow I'm impressed. Was one in the nose? ;^) I've seen a film of Gary Cooper unfolding himself from teh back seat of a P-38 and he was really crammed in there. Not to mention a P-38 with "tip tanks", that must have been one rare bird!!!!!!!!! Al Minyard |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Military & vintage warbird slides for sale | Wings Of Fury | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 10th 04 01:17 AM |
FA: 5 Airplane Model Kits - Bomber, Jet, Warbird | Disgo | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 22nd 04 05:00 PM |
FS: Aircraft Instruments Parts Avionics Warbird Parts | Bill Berle | Home Built | 0 | January 10th 04 02:20 AM |
New B-24 Double Feature Now Showuing at Zeno's Warbird VideoDrive-In! | Zeno | Military Aviation | 0 | September 16th 03 03:59 PM |
Warbird Runway Crash | Mark and Kim Smith | Military Aviation | 3 | September 14th 03 07:47 PM |